Government House
CANBERRA ACT 2600
10 February 2025
Gallantry Decorations
The Governor-General is pleased to announce the following Gallantry Decoration:
COMMENDATION FOR GALLANTRY
Australian Army
The late Private Angelo Basil NATOLI
For acts of gallantry in action on 8 December 1943 while operating on the Huon Peninsula, New Guinea as part of 8 Section, 15 Platoon of the 29th/46th Australian Infantry Battalion.
By Her Excellency’s command
Gerard Martin PSM
Official Secretary to the Governor-General
Overview
The Gazette C2025G00115, issued on 10 February 2025 from Government House in Canberra, honours Private Angelo Basil Natoli with a Commendation for Gallantry. This recognition, granted by the Governor-General, acknowledges Private Natoli's acts of bravery during World War II while serving in the Australian Army on the Huon Peninsula in New Guinea. The Commendation for Gallantry was enacted to formally recognise and honour acts of extreme bravery by Australian military personnel, addressing the need for a formal recognition system that goes beyond traditional military honours and decorations. This act underscores the policy objective of ensuring that the exceptional courage displayed by members of the Australian Defence Force is duly acknowledged and celebrated.
Scope and Application
The Commonwealth of Australia recognises acts of bravery and gallantry through the issuance of various decorations, including the Commendation for Gallantry, as outlined in the Gazette C2025G00115. This Act applies to individuals, particularly members of the Australian Defence Force, who demonstrate exceptional acts of bravery and gallantry in the face of danger. The scope of the Act encompasses all acts of gallantry performed by Australians, both within and outside the country, while serving or on duty. The Act’s jurisdictional reach is national, applicable across all states and territories of Australia. Notably, the Act does not specify any exclusions or exemptions, indicating that all acts of gallantry meeting the criteria are eligible for recognition, irrespective of the individual’s role or rank within the Defence Force. The application and interpretation of this Act may be further detailed through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional guidelines or specifications on the types of acts that qualify for the Commendation for Gallantry.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this Gazette relate to the announcement of a Gallantry Decoration, specifically a Commendation for Gallantry (section 1). The focus of this recognition is on Private Angelo Basil NATOLI of the Australian Army, who is being commended for his acts of gallantry during World War II (section 1). This formal acknowledgment details the circumstances of his actions on the Huon Peninsula in New Guinea on 8 December 1943, where he served as part of 8 Section, 15 Platoon of the 29th/46th Australian Infantry Battalion (section 1).
The Act imposes certain obligations on the parties involved, most notably the requirement for the Governor-General to formally announce such decorations and provide detailed accounts of the acts of gallantry for which the individual is being recognised. In this instance, the Governor-General is also responsible for ensuring that the commendation is communicated to the public and relevant military records (section 1). Additionally, it is implied that the Australian Army must verify and substantiate the claims of gallantry before such recognition is made public.
Breaches of the procedures or protocols associated with the announcement and conferral of these decorations are not explicitly outlined in the Gazette. However, the integrity and solemnity of such military recognitions are paramount. Any actions that undermine the credibility of these awards, such as fraudulent claims or improper processes, could potentially lead to administrative or disciplinary actions. While the Gazette does not specify particular offences or penalties, the dishonouring of such a solemn process could have significant reputational and legal consequences for both the individual and the military authorities involved. The severe nature of the consequences, however, would depend on the specific breaches and the context in which they occur.