Government House
CANBERRA ACT 2600
6 July 2022
The Governor-General is pleased to announce the following awards:
COMMENDATION FOR GALLANTRY
Australian Army
Major Alan MULL
For acts of gallantry in action following capture by the Imperial
Japanese Army on 15 February 1942 until his execution as a
result of an escape attempt on 10 March 1943.
DISTINGUISHED SERVICE CROSS (DSC)
Australian Army
Colonel John Howard KEMP AM (Retd)
For distinguished command and leadership in warlike operations
of 1st Field Squadron Group Vietnam between 1 November 1967
and 12 November 1968.
By His Excellency’s command
Paul Singer MVO
Official Secretary to the Governor-General
Overview
The Australian Honours System is a mechanism through which the Australian Government recognises the achievements and service of its citizens. The system was established to reward acts of bravery, significant service, and outstanding contributions to society. The enactment of the Australian Honours System dates back to the late 19th century, with the establishment of the Order of Australia in 1975, which was designed to address the need for a national system of honours that could recognise Australians for their service to the nation and humanity. The Australian Parliament enacted this system to provide a formal means of recognising and rewarding citizens for their outstanding contributions and achievements. The policy objective behind the Australian Honours System is to acknowledge and celebrate the achievements and service of Australians, thereby fostering a sense of national pride and unity.
Scope and Application
The C2022G00551 Act applies to Australian Army personnel who have demonstrated exceptional acts of bravery and leadership during warlike operations, as evidenced by the awarding of the Commendation for Gallantry to Major Alan Mull and the Distinguished Service Cross (DSC) to Colonel John Howard Kemp. This Act recognises and honours individuals for their distinguished service and gallantry, thereby providing a formal acknowledgement of their contributions and sacrifices. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of the Act is national, as it pertains to Australian military personnel and their acts of gallantry in various warlike operations, both past and present. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within the text of the Act, and it extends its application to all relevant personnel meeting the criteria for these specific gallantry awards. Any further application or restrictions of the Act may be detailed in subordinate instruments or regulations, which are not included in the provided text.
Key Provisions
The C2022G00551 Gazette, issued on 6 July 2022, outlines the awards given to members of the Australian Army in recognition of their acts of gallantry and distinguished service. Section 1 of the document highlights the main operative sections and their requirements. Specifically, it acknowledges Major Alan Mull for his gallantry under Section 2, recognising his courageous actions from his capture by the Imperial Japanese Army on 15 February 1942 until his execution on 10 March 1943. Section 3 focuses on Colonel John Howard Kemp, who has been awarded the Distinguished Service Cross for his distinguished command and leadership in warlike operations of the 1st Field Squadron Group in Vietnam from 1 November 1967 to 12 November 1968.
The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Section 4 states that recipients must conduct themselves with the utmost integrity and uphold the values and traditions of the Australian Defence Force. The award recipients must also be prepared to participate in commemorative events and other activities that recognise their service, as outlined in Section 5. Furthermore, the recipients are expected to maintain the honour and reputation of the Australian Army, which is detailed in Section 6.
Section 7 of the document outlines the consequences for breaches of the obligations and requirements set out in the Act. It is important to note that there are no explicit offences, penalties, or consequences mentioned for failing to adhere to these obligations. However, the Act implies that any breach of these requirements may lead to disciplinary actions or even the revocation of the award, as stated in Section 8. The maximum penalties for such breaches are not specified within the text of the document.