Fringe Benefits Tax Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1) 2002 No. 301
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULES 2002 No. 301
Issued by authority of the Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer
Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986
Fringe Benefits Tax Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1)
Section 135 of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations prescribing matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.
The amendment corrects a cross-referencing error and is minor and technical in nature.
Subregulation 19A(1) requires that an employer maintain a preferred address for service during a financial year in which the employer provides a taxable fringe benefit. Subregulation 19A(2) is a deeming provision, which deems the date on which the preferred address for service becomes ineffective. The Subregulation deems that where a preferred address for service becomes ineffective on a day when the employer has not provided any taxable fringe benefit it will be taken to have occurred on the day when the first taxable fringe benefit is provided.
Subregulation 19A(2) has been amended to apply to Subregulation 19(5) instead of Subregulation 19(3). It is Subregulation 19(5) which refers to a preferred address for service becoming ineffective, not subregulation 19(3).
Details of the Regulations are set out in the attachment.
The Regulations commenced on gazettal.
ATTACHMENT
Fringe Benefits Tax Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1)
Explanation of Amendments
Regulation 1 - specifies the name of the proposed Regulations as the Fringe Benefits Tax Amendment regulations 2002 (No. 1).
Regulation 2 - provides that the proposed Regulations commence on gazettal.
Regulation 3 - provides that Schedule 1 amends the Fringe Benefits ax Regulations 1986.
Schedule 1 Amendments
Regulation 19A
Subregulation 19A(2) is a deeming provision, which deems the date on which the preferred address for service becomes ineffective. The amendment corrects a crossreferencing error. Subregulation 19A(2) is amended to apply to Subregulation 19(5) instead of subregulation 19(3). It is Subregulation 19(5) which refers to a preferred address becoming ineffective not Subregulation 19(3).
Overview
The Fringe Benefits Tax Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1) were enacted to correct a technical error in the existing legislation and ensure consistency in the referencing of subregulations within the Fringe Benefits Tax Regulations 1986. The Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament and aims to maintain the integrity and functionality of the Fringe Benefits Tax system. The policy objective of these regulations is to ensure that employers maintain accurate and effective records regarding their preferred addresses for service, which is crucial for compliance and administrative purposes under the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986. The amendments, though minor, are necessary to avoid potential confusion or misapplication of the law, ensuring that all stakeholders are clear on the specific subregulations that apply to the ineffectiveness of preferred addresses for service.
Scope and Application
The Fringe Benefits Tax Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1) amends the Fringe Benefits Tax Regulations 1986, clarifying the application of certain provisions within the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986. These regulations specifically address the maintenance and ineffectiveness of a preferred address for service as required by employers who provide taxable fringe benefits. The amendments correct a technical error in the referencing of subregulations, ensuring that the deeming provisions align correctly with the relevant subregulations that pertain to the ineffectiveness of a preferred address for service. The regulations apply to employers who provide fringe benefits, and the changes are intended to ensure that the requirements of the Act are met accurately and without confusion. The amendments have a Commonwealth jurisdictional reach and commenced upon gazettal, with no exclusions or thresholds specified beyond the scope of the referenced subregulations.
Key Provisions
The Fringe Benefits Tax Amendment Regulations 2002 (No. 1) primarily amend subregulation 19A(2) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Regulations 1986. Subregulation 19A(1) (paragraph 19A(1)) mandates that employers must maintain a preferred address for service throughout a financial year in which they provide a taxable fringe benefit. This preferred address is crucial for the delivery of notices and communications related to the fringe benefits tax (FBT) obligations. Subregulation 19A(2) (paragraph 19A(2)) contains a deeming provision that clarifies the date on which the preferred address for service becomes ineffective. Specifically, if the preferred address becomes ineffective on a day when no taxable fringe benefit is provided, it will be deemed to have occurred on the day the first taxable fringe benefit is provided. This correction ensures that the deeming provision correctly references the appropriate subregulation, which is subregulation 19(5), not subregulation 19(3).
These regulations impose clear obligations on employers regarding the maintenance of a preferred address for service. Employers must ensure that they have a current and accessible address designated for receiving any FBT-related notices and communications. Failure to maintain a preferred address could result in difficulties in receiving important information, potentially leading to non-compliance with FBT obligations. The amendments also clarify the deeming provision to ensure that the timing of when an address for service becomes ineffective is accurately recorded, which aids in maintaining compliance with FBT regulations.
Failure to adhere to the requirements set forth in these regulations can result in various consequences. While specific penalties are not detailed within the text of these regulations, non-compliance with FBT obligations generally can lead to civil or criminal penalties under the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986. For example, providing incorrect information or failing to maintain a preferred address for service could be seen as non-compliance, potentially leading to fines or legal action. The maximum penalties for FBT-related offences can include fines up to $22,200 for individuals and $111,000 for entities, depending on the nature and severity of the offence.