Foreign Judgments (Amendment) Regulations 1999 (No. 2) 1999 No. 334
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Statutory Rules 1999 No. 334
Issued by the Authority of the Attorney-General
Foreign Judgments Act 1991
Foreign Judgments (Amendment) Regulations 1999 (No. 2)
Section 16 of the Foreign Judgments Act 1991 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations prescribing all matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed.
Part 2 of the Act provides, amongst other matters, for the registration and enforcement in Australia of judgments given in foreign courts to which the Act, has been extended.
Subsection 5(1) of the Act provides that the regulations may provide that Part 2 of the Act extends in relation to a country if the Governor-General is satisfied that, in the event of the benefits conferred by Part 2 being applied to money judgments given in the superior courts of that country, substantial reciprocity of treatment will be assured in relation to the enforcement in that country of money judgments given in Australian superior courts.
The purpose of the regulations is to extend Part 2 of the Act in relation to specified superior courts of the Republic of Korea.
Details of the Regulations are set out in the attachment.
The Regulations commenced on gazettal.
Regulation 1 is formal.
Regulation 2 provides that the Regulations commence on gazettal.
Regulation 3 provides that Schedule 1 in the Regulations amends the Foreign Judgments Regulations.
Item 1 of Schedule 1 substitutes item 16A of the Schedule to the Foreign Judgments Regulations. Existing item 16A of the Schedule, which refers to the High Court and Supreme of Malawi, is now item 16B of the Schedule. The new item 16A refers to the Republic of Korea, effectively extending Part 2 of the Act to the Supreme Court, Appellate Courts, District Courts, Family Court, Patent Court and Administrative Court of the Republic of Korea.
Overview
The Foreign Judgments (Amendment) Regulations 1999 (No. 2) were enacted to amend the Foreign Judgments Act 1991, aiming to facilitate the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Australia. These regulations were introduced by the Australian Parliament and are authorised by the Attorney-General. The primary objective of these regulations is to extend the application of Part 2 of the Foreign Judgments Act to the superior courts of the Republic of Korea, ensuring that there is substantial reciprocity in the enforcement of monetary judgments between Australia and South Korea. This legislative amendment responds to the need for updated reciprocity provisions in international judicial cooperation, reflecting the growing legal and commercial ties between Australia and South Korea.
Scope and Application
The Foreign Judgments (Amendment) Regulations 1999 (No. 2) serve to extend the application of the Foreign Judgments Act 1991 to the superior courts of the Republic of Korea, specifically the Supreme Court, Appellate Courts, District Courts, Family Court, Patent Court, and Administrative Court. This extension is pursuant to subsection 5(1) of the Act, which mandates that the Governor-General must be satisfied that there will be substantial reciprocity in the enforcement of Australian money judgments in the courts of the Republic of Korea. These regulations were issued under the authority of the Attorney-General and are designed to facilitate the registration and enforcement of foreign judgments within Australia, thereby enhancing the legal framework for international judicial cooperation. The regulations commenced upon gazettal and amend the Foreign Judgments Regulations to include the specified Korean courts, thereby broadening the scope of the Act to encompass these jurisdictions.
Key Provisions
The Foreign Judgments (Amendment) Regulations 1999 (No. 2) primarily amend the existing Foreign Judgments Regulations to extend the application of the Foreign Judgments Act 1991 (the Act) to the Republic of Korea. Specifically, Regulation 1 establishes the formal framework of the Regulations, while Regulation 2 ensures that the Regulations commence on gazettal. Regulation 3 then makes the necessary amendments to Schedule 1 of the Foreign Judgments Regulations. Item 1 of Schedule 1 replaces item 16A, which previously referred to the High Court and Supreme Court of Malawi, with a new item 16A that refers to the Republic of Korea. This new item includes the Supreme Court, Appellate Courts, District Courts, Family Court, Patent Court, and Administrative Court of the Republic of Korea, thereby extending the application of Part 2 of the Act to these courts.
The Act imposes several obligations on parties and entities involved in foreign judgments. Section 5(1) requires that the Governor-General must be satisfied that substantial reciprocity of treatment will be assured in relation to the enforcement of Australian money judgments in the country concerned. This ensures a balanced approach to the enforcement of foreign judgments. Additionally, the regulations must be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 16 of the Act, which mandates that regulations may prescribe all matters required or permitted by the Act. This means that any amendments or extensions of the Act must be formally documented and communicated through the regulations.
Breach of the provisions of the Foreign Judgments Act 1991 or the Foreign Judgments (Amendment) Regulations 1999 (No. 2) may result in various consequences. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, breaches of similar legislation generally attract civil or criminal penalties depending on the nature and severity of the breach. These may include fines or imprisonment for criminal offences, and financial penalties or other civil remedies for breaches of regulatory requirements. The exact penalties would depend on the specific provisions of the Act and any applicable common law principles.