Food Standards (Proposal P1043 – Code Revision (2016)) Variation

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2017L00414 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

1. Authority

 

Section 13 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (the FSANZ Act) provides that the functions of Food Standards Australia New Zealand (the Authority) include the development of standards and variations of standards for inclusion in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code).

 

Division 2 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act specifies that the Authority may prepare a proposal for the development or variation of food regulatory measures, including standards. This Division also stipulates the procedure for considering a proposal for the development or variation of food regulatory measures.

 

The Authority prepared Proposal P1043 to make a range of minor amendments to the Code including the correction of typographical errors, inconsistencies, formatting issues, and updating of references. The Authority considered the Proposal in accordance with Division 2 of Part 3 and has approved a draft Standard.

 

Following consideration by the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation, section 92 of the FSANZ Act stipulates that the Authority must publish a notice about the standard or draft variation of a standard.

 

Section 94 of the FSANZ Act specifies that a standard, or a variation of a standard, in relation to which a notice is published under section 92 is a legislative instrument, but is not subject to parliamentary disallowance or sunsetting under the Legislation Act 2003.

 

2. Purpose

 

The Authority has approved the variation because minor typographical and grammatical errors and cross-reference issues are identified in the Code from time-to-time. References in the Code also become superseded as the documents they refer to are updated. This Proposal was prepared to resolve such issues.

 

3. Documents incorporated by reference

 

The variations do not incorporate any new documents by reference, although following existing references are updated by some variations (see para 6.2):

 

  • Generally Recognised as Safe (GRAS) flavouring substances published by the Flavour and Extract Manufacturers’ Association of the United States
  • European Parliament regulation on the provision of food information to consumers
  • JECFA Monograph series
  • United States Pharmacopeial Convention Food chemicals Codex
  • International Oenological Codex

 

4. Consultation

 

In accordance with the procedure in Division 2 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act, the Authority’s consideration of Proposal P1043 included one round of public consultation following an assessment and the preparation of a draft Standard and associated report. Submissions were called for on 11 November 2016 for a five-week consultation period.


A Regulation Impact Statement was not required because the variation is likely to have a minor impact on business and individuals.

 

5. Statement of compatibility with human rights

 

This instrument is exempt from the requirements for a statement of compatibility with human rights as it is a non-disallowable instrument under section 94 of the FSANZ Act.

 

6. Variation

 

6.1 Correcting minor errors and omissions, and improving clarity

 

Items [4], [7], [8], [12], [16], [20], [25] to [26], [28] to [33], [37] to [43], [45] to [52] and [57] to [61] include amendments to correct minor errors and omissions to text and punctuation, as well improving clarity of some text. 

 

6.2 Updating references

 

Items [1], [5], [6], [9] to [11], [13] to [15], [17] to [24], [34], [44] and [53] to [56] update cross-references within the Code.

 

6.3 Updating material from international sources

 

Items [3], [27], [35] and [36] reflect changes to sources incorporated by reference.

 

6.4 Omitting material that is no longer required

 

Items [2] and [32] omit provisions that have ceased to have effect.

 

6.5 Variations to Notes

 

Item [7] updates a reference, to a definition. The definition in Standard 1.1.2 was varied in early 2016.

 

Notes are not, by virtue of the definition of ‘standard’ in the FSANZ Act, part of a draft standard and are therefore not subject to the standards development process under Part 3 of the FSANZ Act. The Note variation is provided for completeness.

 

 

 

Overview

The Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act) was enacted to provide a framework for the establishment of Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) and its role in the development and administration of food standards in Australia and New Zealand. The Act aims to ensure that the food sold in Australia and New Zealand is safe and correctly labelled, and that food regulatory measures are kept up to date with the latest scientific information. The FSANZ Act empowers FSANZ to develop and maintain the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code), which sets out the food standards that apply in both countries. The problem this legislation addresses is the need for a consistent and up-to-date set of food standards that can be effectively enforced across both nations. The enacting body was the Commonwealth Parliament, and the policy objective is to ensure public health and safety through effective food regulation. The explanatory statement outlines Proposal P1043, prepared by FSANZ to make minor amendments to the Code, including correcting typographical errors, inconsistencies, formatting issues, and updating references. Following consultation and consideration by the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation, the Authority has approved a draft Standard. The variations do not incorporate any new documents by reference but update existing references and omit material that is no longer required. The proposal underwent one round of public consultation, and a Regulation Impact Statement was not required as the variation is likely to have a minor impact on business and individuals. This instrument is exempt from the requirements for a statement of compatibility with human rights as it is a non-disallowable instrument under section 94 of the FSANZ Act.

Scope and Application

The explanatory statement outlines the scope and application of the proposed minor amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code) by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (the Authority). This Act applies to food standards and variations of standards for inclusion in the Code, affecting industries and businesses involved in food production, processing, and distribution within Australia and New Zealand. The legislative instrument is a draft Standard resulting from Proposal P1043, prepared under section 13 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (the FSANZ Act). The Authority's consideration of the proposal, including a round of public consultation, aligns with Division 2 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act. The variations to the Code aim to correct minor errors, update references, and reflect changes from international sources, without introducing new regulatory measures. The draft Standard is exempt from parliamentary disallowance or sunsetting under the Legislation Act 2003, and a statement of compatibility with human rights is not required as it is a non-disallowable instrument. The variations primarily focus on improving the clarity and accuracy of the Code, ensuring it remains a reliable and up-to-date reference for food regulatory purposes in both Australia and New Zealand.

Key Provisions

The primary sections of the legislation focus on the proposal and subsequent approval of minor amendments to the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code) by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (the Authority). Specifically, section 13 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (the FSANZ Act) enables the Authority to develop standards and variations of standards for inclusion in the Code. The Authority, in this instance, has approved Proposal P1043 which includes a range of minor amendments to correct typographical errors, inconsistencies, formatting issues, and outdated references within the Code. Once the Authority has considered the proposal in line with the procedures outlined in Division 2 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act and the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation has reviewed it, the Authority is required under section 92 of the FSANZ Act to publish a notice about the standard or draft variation of a standard. Section 94 of the FSANZ Act further stipulates that any standard or variation of a standard that is the subject of such a notice is considered a legislative instrument, though it is not subject to parliamentary disallowance or sunsetting under the Legislation Act 2003. The obligations imposed on the Authority under this legislation primarily revolve around the transparent and systematic process for developing and amending food standards. The Authority must follow a structured procedure for considering a proposal, which includes public consultation. In the case of Proposal P1043, the Authority conducted one round of public consultation, inviting submissions for a five-week period starting from 11 November 2016. This ensures that stakeholders have the opportunity to provide input on the proposed amendments before they are finalised. Additionally, the Authority is responsible for updating and maintaining the Code to ensure it remains accurate and relevant, which involves correcting minor errors, updating references, and omitting outdated material. Failure to comply with the requirements of this legislation could result in various legal consequences. Although the specific penalties for breaches are not detailed in the explanatory statement, the FSANZ Act provides a framework within which such breaches could be addressed. Generally, under Australian administrative law, breaches of legislative requirements by public authorities can result in actions for judicial review, where the courts can assess the legality of the Authority's actions. Additionally, the FSANZ Act may impose administrative penalties for non-compliance with food standards, although the specific penalties are not outlined in the provided text. Furthermore, individuals or entities adversely affected by non-compliance could potentially seek redress through civil litigation, depending on the nature and impact of the breach. The legislation also highlights that the approved variation is exempt from the requirements for a statement of compatibility with human rights because it is a non-disallowable instrument under section 94 of the FSANZ Act. This means that the variation does not need to be assessed for compatibility with human rights laws, which typically require public authorities to ensure that their actions do not infringe upon fundamental rights. This exemption is based on the nature of the legislative instrument and its non-disallowable status, as specified by the FSANZ Act. Therefore, while the variation aims to improve the accuracy and clarity of the Code, it does not need to undergo a separate human rights assessment.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Food Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.