Food Standards (Proposal M1021 – Maximum Residue Limits (2022) – Schedule 22) Variation

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2024L00185 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

 

Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991

Food Standards (Proposal M1021 – Maximum Residue Limits (2022) – Schedule 22) Variation

 

1. Authority

 

Section 13 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (the FSANZ Act) provides that the functions of Food Standards Australia New Zealand (the Authority) include the development of standards and variations of standards for inclusion in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code).

 

Division 2 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act specifies that the Authority may prepare a proposal for the development or variation of food regulatory measures, including standards. This Division also stipulates the procedure for considering a proposal for the development or variation of food regulatory measures.

 

The Authority prepared Proposal M1021 to consider making certain amendments in Schedules 20 and 22 of the Code, which are related to maximum residue limits (MRLs) for residues of specific agricultural and veterinary (agvet) chemicals that may occur in food. The Authority considered the Proposal in accordance with Division 2 of Part 3 and has approved two draft variations – the Food Standards (Proposal M1021 – Maximum Residue Limits (2022) – Schedule 22) Variation and the Food Standards (Proposal M1021 – Maximum Residue Limits (2022) – Schedule 20) Variation.

 

This Explanatory Statement relates to the Food Standards (Proposal M1021 – Maximum Residue Limits (2022) – Schedule 22) Variation (the approved draft variation).

 

Following consideration by the Food Ministers’ Meeting (FMM), section 92 of the FSANZ Act stipulates that the Authority must publish a notice about the approved draft variation.

 

2.  Variation is a legislative instrument

 

The approved draft variation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2003 (see section 94 of the FSANZ Act) and is publicly available on the Federal Register of Legislation (www.legislation.gov.au).

 

This instrument is not subject to the disallowance or sunsetting provisions of the Legislation Act 2003. Subsections 44(1) and 54(1) of that Act provide that a legislative instrument is not disallowable or subject to sunsetting if the enabling legislation for the instrument (in this case, the FSANZ Act): (a) facilitates the establishment or operation of an intergovernmental scheme involving the Commonwealth and one or more States; and (b) authorises the instrument to be made for the purposes of the scheme. Regulation 11 of the Legislation (Exemptions and other Matters) Regulation 2015 also exempts from sunsetting legislative instruments a primary purpose of which is to give effect to an international obligation of Australia.

 

The FSANZ Act gives effect to an intergovernmental agreement (the Food Regulation Agreement) and facilitates the establishment or operation of an intergovernmental scheme (national uniform food regulation). That Act also gives effect to Australia’s obligations under an international agreement between Australia and New Zealand. For these purposes, the Act establishes the Authority to develop food standards for consideration and endorsement by the Food Ministers Meeting (FMM). The FMM is established under the Food Regulation Agreement and the international agreement between Australia and New Zealand, and consists of New Zealand, Commonwealth and State/Territory members. If endorsed by the FMM, the food standards on gazettal and registration are incorporated into and become part of Commonwealth, State and Territory and New Zealand food laws. These standards or instruments are then administered, applied and enforced by these jurisdictions’ regulators as part of those food laws.

 

3. Purpose

 

The Authority has approved a draft variation to Schedule 22 of the Code to correct spelling and typographical errors; and reduce any ambiguity for some food commodities, groups or subgroups referred to in that Schedule.

 

The amendments proposed to Schedule 22 are related to Schedule 20 as follows.

 

Paragraphs 1.4.2—3(2)(a) provides that, when calculating the amount of a permitted residue in a food, the amount to calculate is the amount of that residue that is in the portion of the commodity that is specified in Schedule 22. Subsection 1.4.2—3(4) provides that in Standard 1.4.2, and Schedule 20 and Schedule 21, a reference to a particular food is to the food as described in Schedule 22.

 

4. Documents incorporated by reference

 

The approved draft variation does not incorporate any documents by reference.

 

5. Consultation

 

In accordance with the procedure in Division 2 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act, the Authority’s consideration of Proposal M1021 included one round of public consultation following an assessment, and the preparation of two draft variations and associated assessment summary. A call for submissions (including the draft variations) was open for a six-week period in Australia, with a coinciding 60 day notification period to the WTO.

 

Changes have been made to the Impact Analysis requirements by the Office of Impact Analysis (OIA) [[1]]. Impact analysis is no longer required to be finalised with the OIA. Prior to these changes, the OIA provided FSANZ with a standing exemption (ID 12065) from preparing a regulation impact statement for MRL proposals and applications, due to them being machinery in nature. Additionally, in 2021, the then OBPR advised FSANZ that the impacts of updating Schedule 22 to align with newer Codex food classifications and increasing the clarity around what specific MRLs in Schedule 20 apply to each food, as being below the threshold for a RIS (ID 44087). Under the new approach, FSANZ’s assessment is that a regulatory impact statement is not required for this proposal.

 

6. Statement of compatibility with human rights

 

This instrument is exempt from the requirements for a statement of compatibility with human rights as it is a non-disallowable instrument under section 44 of the Legislation Act 2003.

 

7. Variation

 

Clause 1 of the variation provides that the name of the variation is the Food Standards (Proposal M1021 – Maximum Residue Limits (2022)Schedule 22) Variation.

 

Clause 2 of the variation provides that the Code is amended by the Schedule to the variation.

 

Clause 3 of the variation provides that the variation will commence on the date of gazettal of the instrument.

 

Item [1] of the Schedule to the variation would amend Schedule 22 by making the following amendments to the table to subsection S22—5(7).

 

Sub-item [1.1] of the Schedule to the variation would repeal the entry for item 1 of the table, and substitute it with a new entry for that item.

 

Item 1 of the table relates to the class of food ‘Fruit’. The new entry for ‘Fruit’ contains the following amendments:

 

  • the spelling of ‘Grapefuits’ is changed to ‘Grapefruit’ in the subgroup ‘Pummelos and Grapefuits’ of the group ‘Citrus’;
  • ‘large size cultivars’ is added to the commodity ‘Tangelos’ for the subgroup ‘Pummelos and Grapefruit’ of the group ‘Citrus’;
  • ‘Tangelos, small and medium cultivar sizes’ is added, in alphabetical order, as a commodity for the ‘Mandarins’ subgroup of the group ‘Citrus’;
  • the ‘s’ is removed from the commodity ‘Mandarins’ for the subgroup ‘Mandarins’ of the group ‘Citrus’;
  • the bottom border line under the group ‘Stone fruits’ is removed;
  • the top border line above the subgroup ‘Assorted tropical and sub-tropical fruits – edible peel – medium to large’ in the group ‘Assorted Tropical and sub-tropical fruit—edible peel’ is removed;
  • fruit’ is removed from the commodity ‘Elephant fruit apple’ for the ‘Assorted tropical and sub-tropical fruits - inedible rough or hairy peel – large’ subgroup of the group ‘Assorted tropical and sub-tropical fruits - inedible peel’.

 

Sub-item [1.2] of the Schedule to the variation would repeal the entry for item 2 of the table, and substitute it with a new entry for that item.

 

Item 2 of the table relates to the class of food ‘Vegetables’. The new entry for ‘Vegetables’ contains the following amendments:

 

  • ‘Radish leaves’ is added, in alphabetical order, as a commodity for the subgroup ‘Brassica Leafy vegetables’ of the group ‘Leafy vegetables’;
  • the top border line in columns 1 and 2, above the group ‘Fruiting vegetables, other than Cucurbits’ is removed;
  • ‘Radish leaves (including radish tops)’ is removed as a commodity for the subgroup ‘Leaves of root and tuber vegetables’ of the group ‘Leafy vegetables’;
  • Beans (dry)’ is added, in alphabetical order, as a commodity for the subgroup ‘Dry Beans’ of the group ‘Pulses’;
  • ‘Ivy gourd’ is added, in alphabetical order, as a commodity for the subgroup ‘Fruiting vegetables, Cucurbits – Cucumbers and Summer squashes’ of the group ‘Fruiting vegetables, Cucurbits’;
  • ‘Ivy gourd’ is removed as the commodity for the subgroup ‘Leaves of trees, shrubs and vines’ of the group ‘Leafy vegetables’;
  • the commodity ‘Ivy gourd’ is replaced with the commodity ‘Ivy gourd leaves’ for the subgroup ‘Leaves of Cucurbitaceae’ of the group ‘Leafy vegetables’;
  • a top border line from column 3 to 5 is inserted above the group ‘Stalk and stem vegetables’;
  • the subgroup ‘Pepper and pepper-like commodities’ is replaced with the subgroup ‘Peppers’ in the group ‘Fruiting vegetables, other than Cucurbits’;
  • the subgroup ‘Eggplant and eggplant-like commodities’ is replaced with the subgroup ‘Eggplants’ in the group ‘Fruiting vegetables, other than Cucurbits’.

 

Sub-item [1.3] of the Schedule to the variation would repeal the entry for item 4 of the table to subsection S22—5(7), and substitute it with a new entry for that item.

 

Item 4 of the table relates to the class of food ‘Nuts, seeds and saps’. The new entry for ‘Nuts, seeds and saps’ contains the following amendments:

 

  • the commodity ‘All commodities from the groups small seed oilseeds, sunflower seeds, cottonseed’ is replaced with the commodity ‘All commodities from the subgroups small seed oilseeds, sunflower seeds, cotton seed’ for the ‘Oilseeds’ subgroup of the group ‘Oilseeds and oilfruits’;
  • the word ‘Cottonseed’, wherever occurring, is replaced with ‘Cotton seed’.
  • The strikethrough on the ‘s’ is removed from the commodity ‘Beech nuts’ for the Tree nuts group.

 

[[1]].    Formerly known as the Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

Overview

The Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 was enacted to provide for the establishment of Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) and to set out its functions, powers, and procedures. This Act was introduced to address the need for a unified approach to food regulation across Australia and New Zealand, thereby ensuring that food safety standards are consistent and effective. The Act was enacted by the Parliament of Australia, with the policy objective of safeguarding public health and ensuring that food is safe and of high quality by setting food standards that are science-based and internationally recognised. FSANZ is authorised to develop food standards and variations of those standards for inclusion in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code. This includes the establishment of maximum residue limits (MRLs) for residues of agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food, which are critical for protecting consumers from potential health risks. The Food Standards (Proposal M1021 – Maximum Residue Limits (2022) – Schedule 22) Variation is a legislative instrument prepared by FSANZ to correct spelling and typographical errors, and to reduce ambiguity in the food commodities, groups, or subgroups referred to in Schedule 22 of the Code. Following the Authority's consideration and approval, the variation was endorsed by the Food Ministers’ Meeting and is now subject to gazettal and registration, thereby becoming part of the national food regulation scheme.

Scope and Application

The Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 applies to Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), which is responsible for developing and varying food standards for Australia and New Zealand. These standards, once endorsed by the Food Ministers' Meeting, become part of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code. The Act applies to entities involved in the production, import, and sale of food products within Australia, New Zealand, and potentially other countries where these standards are adopted. The geographic reach of this Act is national, extending across all states and territories in Australia and New Zealand. The Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions, but it provides for variations to standards through subordinate instruments, such as the Food Standards (Proposal M1021 – Maximum Residue Limits (2022) – Schedule 22) Variation, which was approved by FSANZ and is exempt from disallowance and sunsetting provisions under the Legislation Act 2003. This variation corrects spelling and typographical errors and reduces ambiguity for food commodities, groups, or subgroups in Schedule 22 of the Code. This variation, as a legislative instrument, is not subject to disallowance or sunsetting due to its role in facilitating an intergovernmental scheme and international obligations. The approved draft variation amends Schedule 22 to correct errors and improve clarity in the classification of food commodities, ensuring consistency and accuracy in the application of maximum residue limits for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food. This process involved a round of public consultation, and the Authority assessed that a regulatory impact statement was not required for this proposal. The variation is designed to enhance the administration and enforcement of food standards across all jurisdictions participating in the scheme.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act) relevant to this variation are sections 13, 92, and 94, which provide the Authority with the power to develop and vary food standards, require publication of approved variations, and specify the legislative nature of these instruments, respectively. The Act also mandates the establishment of the Authority to facilitate the development and endorsement of food standards by the Food Ministers’ Meeting (FMM), which are then incorporated into national food laws. This particular variation, the Food Standards (Proposal M1021 – Maximum Residue Limits (2022) – Schedule 22) Variation, amends Schedule 22 of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (Code) to correct spelling and typographical errors and reduce ambiguity for specific food commodities, groups, or subgroups. The FSANZ Act imposes several obligations and requirements on Food Standards Australia New Zealand (the Authority) and the FMM. The Authority must prepare proposals for the development or variation of food regulatory measures, including maximum residue limits (MRLs) for agricultural and veterinary chemicals in food. This proposal, M1021, sought to correct errors and reduce ambiguity in Schedule 22. The Authority's consideration of this proposal included public consultation, assessment, and the preparation of draft variations. The FMM is responsible for endorsing these variations before they are gazetted and incorporated into national food laws. Additionally, the Authority must publish a notice about the approved draft variation as per section 92 of the FSANZ Act. Failure to comply with the provisions of the FSANZ Act and the approved variations can lead to civil and criminal consequences. While the Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for breaches, non-compliance with food standards and regulations can result in enforcement actions by relevant authorities. These actions may include fines, recalls of non-compliant food products, and legal proceedings against individuals or entities found in violation of the standards. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as applicable state and territory laws. The approved draft variation, being a legislative instrument, is not subject to the disallowance or sunsetting provisions of the Legislation Act 2003. This is because the FSANZ Act facilitates the establishment or operation of an intergovernmental scheme involving the Commonwealth and one or more States, and authorises the instrument for the purposes of that scheme. Additionally, the Act gives effect to an international obligation of Australia, further exempting the instrument from disallowance and sunsetting. These exemptions ensure the continuity and stability of national food regulation. The explanatory statement provides a detailed overview of the approved draft variation, its purpose, the process followed in its development, and the specific amendments to Schedule 22 of the Code. The variation aims to correct spelling and typographical errors and reduce ambiguity for certain food commodities, groups, or subgroups. The Authority's consideration of the proposal included public consultation and assessment, culminating in the endorsement by the FMM and subsequent gazettal of the variation. The amendments made to Schedule 22 include changes to the spelling and classification of food commodities, as well as adjustments to the structure of the schedule to enhance clarity and accuracy.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Food Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.