Food Standards (Application A1267 – Fructanase from GM Trichoderma reesei as a processing aid) Variation

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2024L00078 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT 

 

Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 

 

Food Standards (Application A1267 – Fructanase from GM Trichoderma reesei as a processing aid) Variation

1. Authority

 

Section 13 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (the FSANZ Act) provides that the functions of Food Standards Australia New Zealand (the Authority) include the development of standards and variations of standards for inclusion in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code).

 

Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act specifies that the Authority may accept applications for the development or variation of food regulatory measures, including standards. This Division also stipulates the procedure for considering an application for the development or variation of food regulatory measures.

 

The Authority accepted Application A1267 which sought to amend the Code to permit the use of a protein engineered variant of the fructanase enzyme (EC 3.2.1.80) from genetically modified Trichoderma reesei containing the fructanase gene from Lactobacillus crispatus to be used as a processing aid in the manufacture of bakery products. The Authority considered the Application in accordance with Division 1 of Part 3 and has approved a draft variation – the Food Standards (Application A1267 – Fructanase from GM Trichoderma reesei as a processing aid) Variation. 

 

Following consideration by the Food Ministers’ Meeting (FMM), section 92 of the FSANZ Act stipulates that the Authority must publish a notice about the approved draft standard or variation.

 

2.  Variation is a legislative instrument

 

The approved draft variation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2003 (see section 94 of the FSANZ Act) and will be publicly available on the Federal Register of Legislation (www.legislation.gov.au).

 

The instrument is not subject to the disallowance or sunsetting provisions of the Legislation Act 2003. Subsections 44(1) and 54(1) of that Act provide that a legislative instrument is not disallowable or subject to sunsetting if the enabling legislation for the instrument (in this case, the FSANZ Act): (a) facilitates the establishment or operation of an intergovernmental scheme involving the Commonwealth and one or more States; and (b) authorises the instrument to be made for the purposes of the scheme. Regulation 11 of the Legislation (Exemptions and other Matters) Regulation 2015 also exempts from sunsetting legislative instruments a primary purpose of which is to give effect to an international obligation of Australia.

 

The FSANZ Act gives effect to an intergovernmental agreement (the Food Regulation Agreement) and facilitates the establishment or operation of an intergovernmental scheme (national uniform food regulation). That Act also gives effect to Australia’s obligations under an international agreement between Australia and New Zealand. For these purposes, the Act establishes the Authority to develop food standards for consideration and endorsement by the FMM. The FMM is established under the Food Regulation Agreement and the international agreement between Australia and New Zealand, and consists of New Zealand, Commonwealth and State/Territory members. If endorsed by the FMM, the food standards on gazettal and registration are incorporated into and become part of Commonwealth, State and Territory and New Zealand food laws. These standards or instruments are then administered, applied and enforced by these jurisdictions’ regulators as part of those food laws.

 

3. Purpose

 

The Authority has approved a draft variation amending the table to subsection S18––9(3) in Schedule 18 of the Code to permit the use of a protein engineered variant of the fructanase (EC 3.2.1.80) enzyme sourced from genetically modified Trichoderma reesei containing the fructanase gene from Lactobacillus crispatus, as a processing aid in the manufacture of bakery products. This permission is subject to the condition that the maximum permitted level or amount of the enzyme that may be present in the food must be consistent with good manufacturing practice (GMP).

 

4. Documents incorporated by reference

 

The approved draft variation does not incorporate any documents by reference.

 

However, existing provisions of the Code incorporate documents by reference that will prescribe identity and purity specifications for the processing aid to be permitted by the approved draft variation. Section 1.1.1—15 of the Code requires substances used as processing aids to comply with any relevant identity and purity specifications listed in Schedule 3 of the Code. Section S3—2 of Schedule 3 incorporates by reference the specifications listed in the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) Compendium of Food Additive Specifications (FAO JECFA Monographs 26 (2021)) and the United States Pharmacopeial Convention Food Chemicals Codex (13th edition, 2022). These include general specifications for the identity and purity parameters of enzyme preparations used in food processing.

 

5. Consultation

 

In accordance with the procedure in Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act, the Authority’s consideration of Application A1267 included one round of public consultation following an assessment and the preparation of a draft variation and associated assessment summary. Submissions were called for on 6 July 2023 for a five-week consultation period.

 

The Office of Impact Analysis[1] granted the Authority a standing exemption from the requirement to develop a Regulatory Impact Statement for applications relating to permitting processing aids and genetically modified foods (OBPR correspondence dated 24 November 2010, reference 12065). This standing exemption was provided as permitting processing aids and genetically modified foods is deregulatory as their use will be voluntary if the application concerned is approved. This standing exemption relates to the introduction of a food to the food supply that has been determined to be safe.

 

6. Statement of compatibility with human rights

 

This instrument is exempt from the requirements for a statement of compatibility with human rights as it is a non-disallowable instrument under section 44 of the Legislation Act 2003.


7. Variation

Clause 1 of the variation provides that the name of the variation is the Food Standards (Application A1267 – Fructanase from GM Trichoderma reesei as a processing aid) Variation.

Clause 2 of the variation provides that the Code is amended by the Schedule to the variation.

Clause 3 of the variation provides that the variation will commence on the date of gazettal of the instrument.

 

7.1 Item [1]

 

Item [1] of the Schedule to the variation inserts a new entry, in alphabetical order, into column 1 of the table to subsection S18—9(3) of the Code. The new entry consists of the following enzyme:

 

  • Fructan β-fructosidase, protein engineered variant, (EC 3.2.1.80) sourced from Trichoderma reesei containing the fructan β-fructosidase gene from Lactobacillus crispatus’

 

The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology uses the accepted name ‘fructan β-fructosidase’ for the enzyme numbered EC 3.2.1.80, which is the name used in the variation. However, the synonym ‘fructanase’ was used by the applicant in the application and has been referred to in this Explanatory Statement.

 

The permitted technological purpose for this enzyme is prescribed in column 2 of the table i.e. for use as a processing aid in the manufacture of bakery products.

 

The permission is subject to the condition, as prescribed in column 3 of the table, that the maximum permitted level or amount of this enzyme that may be present in the food must be consistent with GMP.

 

The effect of item [1] of the Schedule to the variation is to permit the proposed use of the protein engineered variant of the enzyme fructanase (EC 3.2.1.80) sourced from a genetically modified Trichoderma reesei containing the fructanase gene from Lactobacillus crispatus as a processing aid in accordance with the Code.

 

7.2 Item [2]

 

Item [2] of the Schedule to the variation amends the Note after the table to subsection S18—9(3) by omitting the existing dot point list in the Note (the dot point list), and substituting it with a new dot point list. The dot point list is a list of protein engineered variants of enzymes that are listed in the table to subsection S18—9(3) as permitted processing aids for specific technological purposes; and the new list includes ‘Fructan β-fructosidase, protein engineered variant;’, which is inserted in the table by item [1] of the variation (see above).

 

The existing protein engineered variants of enzymes are relisted in alphabetical order in the new dot point list.

 

The Note after the table to subsection S18—9(3) relates to protein engineered variants of enzymes, which are listed in the table to subsection S18—9(3) as processing aids permitted to be used for specific technological purposes. The Note explains that if such an enzyme is used as a processing aid, the resulting food may have as an ingredient a food produced using gene technology, and the requirements relating to foods produced using gene technology in the Code will apply (see Standard 1.2.1 and Standard 1.5.2). The Note then lists the relevant substances.

 

[1] Formerly known as the Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR) 

Overview

The Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act) was enacted to establish Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) as the body responsible for the development of food standards and variations of standards for inclusion in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (Code). The Act was introduced to address the need for a consistent and nationally uniform approach to food regulation between Australia and New Zealand. The FSANZ Act empowers FSANZ to develop food standards and variations in accordance with a specified procedure, ensuring that food products meet safety and quality standards across both countries. The Parliament of Australia enacted this legislation to facilitate the establishment and operation of an intergovernmental scheme involving the Commonwealth and the States. The policy objective is to ensure food safety and public health by maintaining a consistent set of food standards that are enforceable across both Australia and New Zealand. In line with the FSANZ Act, FSANZ accepted Application A1267, which sought to amend the Code to allow the use of a genetically modified fructanase enzyme from Trichoderma reesei as a processing aid in bakery products. Following a round of public consultation, the Authority approved a draft variation, which is subject to endorsement by the Food Ministers’ Meeting. The approved draft variation will be published and will become part of the food laws once endorsed, thereby permitting the use of this enzyme under specific conditions that align with good manufacturing practices.

Scope and Application

The Food Standards (Application A1267 – Fructanase from GM Trichoderma reesei as a processing aid) Variation, made under the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991, applies to entities involved in the manufacture of bakery products, particularly those considering the use of the specified genetically modified fructanase enzyme as a processing aid. This legislative instrument pertains to food regulatory measures within the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code. Its jurisdiction extends across the Commonwealth, state, and territory levels, and it is subject to the endorsement of the Food Ministers’ Meeting, ensuring a coordinated approach to food regulation across these jurisdictions. The variation does not incorporate any documents by reference but relies on existing provisions of the Code that prescribe identity and purity specifications for the processing aid. The variation is not subject to disallowance or sunsetting provisions under the Legislation Act 2003, given its alignment with an intergovernmental scheme and international obligations. The legislative instrument was developed following a round of public consultation and is exempt from certain regulatory requirements, such as a Regulatory Impact Statement and a statement of compatibility with human rights, due to its deregulatory nature and the voluntary use of the approved processing aid.

Key Provisions

The Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act) grants Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) the authority to develop and vary food standards, as specified in section 13(1)(g) of the Act. This responsibility includes accepting applications for the development or variation of food regulatory measures such as standards. Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act outlines the process for considering such applications. The Authority has accepted and approved Application A1267, which seeks to amend the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code) to permit the use of a protein engineered variant of the fructanase enzyme from genetically modified Trichoderma reesei as a processing aid in the manufacture of bakery products. This approval follows the procedure stipulated in Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act. Entities and parties governed by this Act are required to adhere to the new standards and variations set forth in the Code. Specifically, the amendment allows the use of the specified fructanase enzyme as a processing aid in bakery products, provided the amount used is consistent with good manufacturing practices (GMP). The Code already includes provisions that require substances used as processing aids to comply with relevant identity and purity specifications, which are outlined in Schedule 3 of the Code. These specifications are listed in the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) Compendium of Food Additive Specifications and the United States Pharmacopeial Convention Food Chemicals Codex. Failure to comply with the new standards and variations set forth in the Code could lead to civil or criminal consequences, depending on the severity and intent of the breach. The FSANZ Act does not specify maximum penalties for non-compliance, but violations of food standards can typically result in fines or other legal actions under relevant state and territory laws. Additionally, the Authority is mandated to publish a notice about the approved draft variation, as stipulated in section 92 of the FSANZ Act. The approved draft variation is considered a legislative instrument under the Legislation Act 2003 and is exempt from disallowance and sunsetting provisions due to the nature of its enabling legislation. This ensures that the legislative instrument remains in effect unless otherwise specified by law. The instrument will be publicly available on the Federal Register of Legislation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Food Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.