Food Standards (Application A1212 – Beta-fructofuranosidase enzyme from Aspergillus fijiensis) Variation

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2022L00722 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

1. Authority

 

Section 13 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (the FSANZ Act) provides that the functions of Food Standards Australia New Zealand (the Authority) include the development of standards and variations of standards for inclusion in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code).

 

Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act specifies that the Authority may accept applications for the development or variation of food regulatory measures, including standards. This Division also stipulates the procedure for considering an application for the development or variation of food regulatory measures.

 

The Authority accepted application A1212 which seeks to permit Aspergillus fijiensis as a microbial source for the production of the enzyme beta-fructofuranosidase as a processing aid in any food. The Authority considered the application in accordance with Division 1 of Part 3 and has approved a draft variation.

 

Following consideration by the Food Ministers’ Meeting[1], section 92 of the FSANZ Act stipulates that the Authority must publish a notice about the standard or draft variation of a standard.

 

Section 94 of the FSANZ Act specifies that a standard, or a variation of a standard, in relation to which a notice is published under section 92 is a legislative instrument, but is not subject to parliamentary disallowance or sunsetting under the Legislation Act 2003.

 

2. Purpose

 

The Authority has approved a draft variation amending the table to subsection S18––4(5) of the Code to permit the use of the enzyme beta-fructofuranosidase derived from the source microorganism A. fijiensis ATCC 26011 as a processing aid for any technological purpose in any food. The reference to ‘A. fijiensis ATCC 26011’ is a reference to the microorganism at the strain level.

 

The enzyme beta-fructofuranosidase derived from the microbial source Aspergillus niger (A. niger) is already permitted in the Code to be used as a processing aid in the manufacture of all food. Methods for identifying microorganisms are constantly evolving and in some cases microorganisms will be re-identified as different species. In this application, an organism previously approved in the Code was originally identified as the species A. niger, but more advanced methods have now identified it as the species Aspergillus fijiensis (A. fijiensis). Listing both names in the Code would clarify that beta-fructofuranosidase derived from ‘A. niger’ or ‘A. fijiensis’, is permitted to be used as a processing aid in food in accordance with the Code.

 

3. Documents incorporated by reference

 

The approved draft variation does not incorporate any documents by reference.

 

However, existing provisions of the Code incorporate a document by reference that will prescribe identity and purity specifications for the processing aid to be permitted by the approved draft variation. Section 1.1.1—15 of the Code requires substances used as processing aids to comply with any relevant identity and purity specifications listed in Schedule 3 of the Code. Section S3—2 of Schedule 3 incorporates by reference the specifications listed in the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) Compendium of Food Additive Specifications (FAO/WHO 2019) and the United States Pharmacopeial Convention (2020) Food Chemicals Codex (12th edition). These include specifications for enzyme preparations used in food processing.

 

4. Consultation

 

In accordance with the procedure in Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act, the Authority’s consideration of application A1212 included one round of public consultation following an assessment and the preparation of a draft variation and associated assessment summary. Submissions were called for on 4 November 2021 for a six-week consultation period.

 

The Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR) granted the Authority a standing exemption from needing to develop a Regulatory Impact Statement for proposed variations of the Code to permit additional processing aids (OBPR correspondence dated 24 November 2010 - reference 12065). This standing exemption was provided as permitting additional processing aids is likely to have only a minor impact on business and individuals. It is a minor, deregulatory change that allows for the introduction of a food product to the food supply that has been determined to be safe. The use of the approved processing aid is also voluntary.

 

5. Statement of compatibility with human rights

 

This instrument is exempt from the requirements for a statement of compatibility with human rights as it is a non-disallowable instrument under section 94 of the FSANZ Act.

 

6. Variation

 

Item [1] of the Schedule to the approved draft variation repeals the existing entry for the enzyme ‘β-Fructofuranosidase (EC 3.2.1.26)in the table to subsection S18—4(5) in Schedule 18 of the Code; and replaces it with a new entry for that enzyme.

 

The new entry includes a reference to ‘Aspergillus fijiensis ATCC 20611’ as a source for ‘β-Fructofuranosidase (EC 3.2.1.26).

 

The effect of the amendment will be to permit the use of the enzyme, beta-fructofuranosidase (EC 3.2.1.26), derived from A. fijiensis ATCC 20611 as a processing aid to perform any technological purpose in the manufacture of any food – in accordance with the Code.

 

 

 

 

[1] Formerly the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation.

Overview

The Food Standards Australia New Zealand Amendment Instrument 2022 (No. 1) (F2022L00722) was enacted to address the need for updating the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code) to reflect the accurate identification of microbial sources used as processing aids in food production. This legislative instrument was introduced by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (the Authority), as mandated by section 13 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (the FSANZ Act). The policy objective of this amendment is to ensure that food regulatory measures remain current and reflective of scientific advancements, thereby maintaining the safety and quality of food products in Australia and New Zealand. The Authority has approved a draft variation to amend the Code, specifically permitting the use of the enzyme beta-fructofuranosidase derived from Aspergillus fijiensis ATCC 26011 as a processing aid in food, aligning with the evolving methods for identifying microorganisms and ensuring that both previously and newly identified species are accurately represented in the regulatory framework.

Scope and Application

The Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 governs the development and variation of food regulatory measures, including standards, within the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code. The Act applies to Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), an entity tasked with developing these standards, as well as to industries and businesses involved in food production and processing. The approved draft variation, resulting from application A1212, pertains to the microbial source for the production of the enzyme beta-fructofuranosidase, allowing its use as a processing aid in any food. This legislative instrument is not subject to parliamentary disallowance or sunsetting under the Legislation Act 2003. The application of this Act extends across the Commonwealth, applying uniformly in both Australia and New Zealand. There are no specified exclusions or exemptions in this particular legislative instrument, though the Authority has a standing exemption from needing to develop a Regulatory Impact Statement for minor variations such as this one. The legislative instrument does not incorporate any documents by reference, though existing provisions in the Code do, such as those relating to identity and purity specifications for processing aids listed in the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives Compendium and the United States Pharmacopeial Convention Food Chemicals Codex.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the legislation, specifically referencing sections 13, 92, and 94 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act), establish the Authority’s role in developing and varying food standards and require the publication of notices regarding any draft variations approved by the Authority. Section 13 of the FSANZ Act empowers the Authority to develop and vary standards for inclusion in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (Code). Under this provision, the Authority accepted application A1212, which seeks to permit Aspergillus fijiensis as a microbial source for the production of the enzyme beta-fructofuranosidase as a processing aid in any food. Following the Authority’s approval of the draft variation, section 92 mandates the publication of a notice about the standard or draft variation of a standard. Section 94 of the FSANZ Act further clarifies that such a standard or variation is a legislative instrument but is not subject to parliamentary disallowance or sunsetting under the Legislation Act 2003. The Act imposes several obligations on the Authority and other parties involved in the food regulatory framework. Primarily, the Authority must follow the specified procedure for considering applications for the development or variation of food regulatory measures, which includes a mandatory round of public consultation. This procedural requirement ensures transparency and public participation in the regulatory process. Additionally, the Authority is obligated to publish notices about any approved draft variations, thereby ensuring that stakeholders are informed of changes to the Code. The Code itself imposes obligations on food manufacturers and processors to comply with the approved standards and variations, ensuring that any permitted processing aids, such as beta-fructofuranosidase derived from Aspergillus fijiensis, are used in accordance with the Code. The legislation does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches of the approved draft variation. However, non-compliance with the standards and variations set out in the Code could potentially lead to regulatory action under other provisions of the FSANZ Act or related legislation. For example, the manufacture or sale of food containing unapproved processing aids could result in enforcement actions, including fines and other penalties as stipulated in relevant food safety and quality legislation. The exact penalties would depend on the specific provisions of those other Acts and the severity of the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Food Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.