Explanatory Statement
1. Authority
Section 13 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (the FSANZ Act) provides that the functions of Food Standards Australia New Zealand (the Authority) include the development of standards and variations of standards for inclusion in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code).
Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act specifies that the Authority may accept applications for the development or variation of food regulatory measures, including standards. This Division also stipulates the procedure for considering an application for the development or variation of food regulatory measures.
The Authority accepted Application A1101 which seeks to delay the requirement to comply with the qualifying criteria for nutrition content claims about dietary fibre in Standard 1.2.7 – Nutrition, Health and Related Claims of the existing Code, for 12 months (that is, until and including 17 January 2017).
The Authority considered the Application in accordance with Division 1 of Part 3 and has approved a draft consequential variation to Standard 1.2.7.
Following consideration by the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation12F[1], section 92 of the FSANZ Act stipulates that the Authority must publish a notice about the consequential variation.
Section 94 of the FSANZ Act specifies that a standard, or a variation of a standard, in relation to which a notice is published under section 92 is a legislative instrument, but is not subject to parliamentary disallowance or sunsetting under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
2. Purpose
The Authority has approved a draft variation called Food Standards (Application A1101 – Commencement of Dietary Fibre Claim Provisions – Consequential) Variation to make a consequential amendment to Standard 1.2.7 in order to provide an explanation of the transitional arrangement permitted under Standard 1.1A.8.
3. Documents incorporated by reference
The draft consequential variation does not incorporate any documents by reference.
4. Consultation
A non-statutory round of public consultation was undertaken in October 2014 to gather cost‑benefit information and seek stakeholder views to inform the assessment of the Application in accordance with the FSANZ Act, particularly paragraphs 29(2)(a) and (b). Submissions were called for on 23 October 2014 for a four-week consultation period.
In accordance with the procedure in Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act, the Authority’s consideration of Application A1101 included one round of public consultation following an assessment and preparation of a draft Standard, a draft consequential variation and associated report. Submissions were called for on 24 March 2015 for a six-week consultation period.
A Regulation Impact Statement was not required because the draft consequential amendment to Standard 1.2.7 of the existing Code is likely to have only a minor impact on business and individuals (OBPR ID: 17599).
5. Statement of compatibility with human rights
This instrument is exempt from the requirements for a statement of compatibility with human rights as it is a non-disallowable instrument under section 94 of the FSANZ Act.
6. Variation
Item 1 inserts a new Editorial Note into Standard 1.2.7 explaining that:
- Standard 1.1A.8 is a transitional Standard that applies to claims about the presence or absence of dietary fibre in a food and operates concurrently with Standard 1.2.7
- the transitional arrangement permitted under Standard 1.1A.8 allows a supplier making a claim about the presence or absence of dietary fibre in a food to either comply with clause 11 of Standard 1.2.7 or clause 2 of Standard 1.1A.8, but not both
- this transitional arrangement under Standard 1.1A.8 will commence on 18 January 2016 and will cease to operate on 1 March 2016 when the revised Code takes effect and that Standard is revoked
- the revised Code will provide a similar transitional arrangement until and including 17 January 2017.
[1] convening as the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council
Overview
The Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act) was enacted to provide a modernised and more efficient framework for the regulation of food standards in Australia and New Zealand, aiming to ensure food safety and consumer protection. The Act establishes Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) as the body responsible for developing food standards, which are then included in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code. One of the key gaps the FSANZ Act addresses is the need for a streamlined process for the development, variation, and maintenance of food standards that reflect contemporary scientific evidence and public health considerations. The Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament and its policy objective is to harmonise food standards between Australia and New Zealand while ensuring they are science-based and protect public health.
In accordance with the FSANZ Act, FSANZ accepted an application (A1101) to delay the requirement for compliance with qualifying criteria for nutrition content claims about dietary fibre. Following the prescribed procedure, which includes public consultation and approval by the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation, FSANZ approved a draft consequential variation to Standard 1.2.7 of the existing Code. This draft variation, which does not incorporate any documents by reference, aims to provide a transitional arrangement for compliance with dietary fibre claims until the revised Code takes effect. This legislative instrument is not subject to parliamentary disallowance or sunsetting under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Scope and Application
The explanatory statement outlines the approval of a draft consequential variation to Standard 1.2.7 of the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) under section 13 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991. This Act empowers the Authority to develop and vary standards in the Code, including accepting and considering applications for such developments or variations. The Authority has approved a draft variation in response to Application A1101, which seeks to delay compliance with the qualifying criteria for nutrition content claims about dietary fibre until 17 January 2017. The Authority's approval follows a statutory round of public consultation and an assessment under Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act. The draft consequential variation clarifies the transitional arrangement permitted under Standard 1.1A.8, providing an explanation of the transitional arrangement and the timeline for its operation. The instrument does not incorporate any documents by reference and is exempt from the requirements for a statement of compatibility with human rights, as it is a non-disallowable instrument under section 94 of the FSANZ Act.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the legislation (FSANZ Act) provide for the development and variation of food regulatory measures, including standards, by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (the Authority). Section 13 of the FSANZ Act details the Authority’s functions, which include developing standards and variations for inclusion in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code. Division 1 of Part 3 of the Act specifies the procedure for considering applications for the development or variation of food regulatory measures. The Authority has accepted Application A1101, which seeks to delay the compliance requirement for nutrition content claims about dietary fibre in Standard 1.2.7 of the Code for 12 months. Following this acceptance, the Authority has approved a draft consequential variation to Standard 1.2.7, which has been considered by the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation. Section 92 of the FSANZ Act mandates that the Authority must publish a notice about the consequential variation.
The obligations imposed on parties and entities governed by this Act include the requirement for the Authority to accept applications for the development or variation of food regulatory measures, such as standards, and to follow the procedure outlined in Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act. The Authority must also conduct public consultation as part of the assessment process. In this case, the Authority undertook one round of public consultation to gather cost-benefit information and stakeholder views to inform the assessment of Application A1101. Furthermore, the Authority is required to publish a notice about the consequential variation once it has been approved, as stipulated in section 92 of the FSANZ Act. Additionally, the Act exempts this consequential variation from parliamentary disallowance or sunsetting under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, as outlined in section 94.
The legislation does not specify any criminal offences or penalties for breaches. However, it does impose civil consequences for non-compliance with the standards and variations developed or varied by the Authority. The transitional arrangement provided by the draft consequential variation to Standard 1.2.7, which allows suppliers to either comply with clause 11 of Standard 1.2.7 or clause 2 of Standard 1.1A.8, is designed to facilitate compliance and avoid potential breaches. The Authority’s approval of this draft consequential variation and the subsequent publication of a notice under section 92 of the FSANZ Act ensures that all relevant parties are informed of the changes and can plan accordingly to avoid non-compliance.