Explanatory Statement
1. Authority
Section 13 of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (the FSANZ Act) provides that the functions of Food Standards Australia New Zealand (the Authority) include the development of standards and variations of standards for inclusion in the Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code).`
Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act specifies that the Authority may accept applications for the development or variation of food regulatory measures, including standards. This Division also stipulates the procedure for considering an application for the development or variation of food regulatory measures.
FSANZ accepted Application A1051 which seeks permission for the sale and use of food derived from herbicide-tolerant soybean line FG72. The Authority considered the Application in accordance with Division 1 of Part 3 and has prepared a draft Standard.
Following consideration by the COAG Legislative and Governance Forum on Food Regulation[1], section 92 of the FSANZ Act stipulates that the Authority must publish a notice about the draft standard or draft variation of a standard.
Section 94 of the FSANZ Act specifies that a standard, or a variation of a standard, in relation to which a notice is published under section 92 is a legislative instrument, but is not subject to parliamentary disallowance or sunsetting under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
2. Purpose and operation
As it is not listed in the Schedule to Standard 1.5.2, food derived from soybean line FG72 is not currently permitted for sale or use in food. Therefore, FSANZ is proposing to vary Standard 1.5.2 by including food derived from soybean line FG72 in the Schedule.
3. Documents incorporated by reference
The variation does not incorporate any documents by reference.
4. Consultation
In accordance with the procedure in Division 1 of Part 3 of the FSANZ Act, the Authority’s consideration of Application A1051 included one round of public consultation following an assessment and the preparation of a draft variation. A Report (which included the draft Standard) was released for a six-week consultation period.
A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) was not required because the use of food derived from soybean line FG72, if approved, would be voluntary and would be likely to have a minor impact on business and individuals.
5. Statement of compatibility with human rights
This instrument is exempt from the requirements for a statement of compatibility with human rights as it is a non-disallowable instrument under section 94 of the FSANZ Act.
6. Variation
This item adds food derived from soybean line FG72 into the Schedule to Standard 1.5.2.
[1] Previously known as the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council