Findings in relation to a dumping investigation - Rod in Coils Exported from the Republic of Indonesia, Taiwan and the Republic of Turkey

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au C2015G00946 In force Gazette

Legislation content

Customs Act 1901 – Part XVB

Rod in Coils Exported from the Republic of Indonesia, Taiwan and the Republic of Turkey

Findings in Relation to a Dumping Investigation

Public notice under subsections 269TG (1) and (2) of the Customs Act 1901

The Commissioner of the Anti-Dumping Commission (the Commissioner) has completed the investigation into the alleged dumping of rod in coils (the goods) exported to Australia from the Republic of Indonesia (Indonesia), Taiwan and the Republic of Turkey (Turkey).

The goods are classified to the following tariff subheadings in Schedule 3 of the Customs Tariff Act 1995:

  • tariff subheading 7213.91.00 with statistical code 44; and
  • tariff subheading 7227.90.90 with statistical code 42.

A full description of the goods is available in Anti-Dumping Notice No. 2014/27, which is available on the internet at www.adcommission.gov.au

The Commissioner reported his findings and recommendations to me in Anti-Dumping Commission Report No. 240 (REP 240). REP 240 outlines how the Anti-Dumping Commission (the Commission) carried out the investigation and recommends the publication of a dumping duty notice in respect of certain goods.

On 13 May 2015, the Commissioner terminated part of the investigation into the goods exported from Indonesia by PT Ispat Indo (Ispat), and from Turkey by all exporters. Termination Report No. 240 sets out the reasons for this termination, and is available on the internet at www.adcommission.gov.au.

I have considered REP 240 and have accepted the Commissioner’s recommendations and reasons for the recommendations, including all material findings of fact or law on which the Commissioner’s recommendations were based, and particulars of the evidence relied on to support the findings.

The method used to compare export prices and normal values to establish the dumping margin was to compare the weighted average export prices with corresponding normal values over the investigation period in terms of subsection 269TACB(2)(a) of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act). The normal value was established under subsections 269TAC(1) and 269TAC(6) of the Act. The export price was established under subsections 269TAB(1)(a) and 269TAB(3) of the Act.

Particulars of the dumping margins that have been established in respect of rod in coils exported from Indonesia and Taiwan are set out in the table below.

 

Country

Exporter / Manufacturer

Dumping margin and effective rate of  dumping duty

Indonesia

Gunung

10.1%

All other exporters (excluding PT Ispat Indo)

10.1%

Taiwan

Quintain

2.7%

All other exporters

2.7%

 

 

 

 

 

The effective rate of duty that has been determined is an amount worked out in accordance with the ad valorem duty method, as detailed in the table above.

I, KAREN LESLEY ANDREWS, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry and Science, have considered, and accepted, the recommendations of the Commissioner, including the reasons for the recommendations, the material findings of fact on which the recommendations are based and the evidence relied on to support those findings in REP 240.

I am satisfied, as to the goods that have been exported to Australia from Indonesia (except by PT Ispat Indo) and Taiwan, that the amount of the export price of the goods is less than the normal value of those goods and because of that, material injury to the Australian industry producing like goods might have been caused if the security had not been taken. Therefore under subsection 269TG(1) of the Act, I DECLARE that section 8 of the Dumping Duty Act applies to:

(i)     the goods; and

(ii)   like goods that were exported to Australia after 2 March 2015 (when the Commissioner made a preliminary affirmative determination under section 269TD of the Act that there appeared to be sufficient grounds for the publication of a dumping duty notice) but before the publication of this notice.

I am also satisfied that the amount of the export price of like goods that have already been exported to Australia is less than the amount of the normal value of those goods, and the amount of the export price of like goods that may be exported to Australia in the future may be less than the normal value of the goods and because of that, material injury to the Australian industry producing like goods has been caused or is being caused. Therefore under subsection 269TG(2) of the Act, I DECLARE that section 8 of the Dumping Duty Act applies to like goods that are exported to Australia after the date of publication of this notice.

This declaration applies in relation to all exporters of the goods and like goods from Indonesia (except for PT Ispat Indo) and Taiwan. Measures apply to goods that are exported to Australia after publication of this notice. Measures also apply to goods that were exported to Australia after the Commissioner made a preliminary affirmative determination to the day before my decision was published. The considerations relevant to my determination of material injury to the Australian industry caused by dumping are the size of the dumping margins, the effect of dumped imports on Australian industry prices and the consequent impact on the Australian industry including reduced sales volumes, reduced market share, reduced revenues, price depression, price suppression, reduced profits, reduced profitability, reduced employment and reduced attractiveness for reinvestment.

In making my determination, I have considered whether any injury to the Australian industry is being caused or threatened by a factor other than the exportation of dumped goods, and have not attributed injury caused by other factors to the exportation of those dumped goods.

Interested parties may seek a review of my decision by lodging an application with the Anti-Dumping Review Panel, in accordance with the requirements in Division 9 of Part XVB of the Act, within 30 days of the publication of this notice.

Particulars of the export prices, non-injurious prices, and normal values of the goods (as ascertained in the confidential tables to this notice) will not be published in this notice as they may reveal confidential information.

Clarification about how anti-dumping measures are applied to ‘goods on the water’ is available in Australian Customs Dumping Notice No. 2012/34, available at www.adcommission.gov.au.

REP 240 and other documents included in the public record may be examined at the Commission’s office by contacting the case manager on the details provided below. Alternatively, the public record is available at www.adcommission.gov.au.

Enquiries about this notice may be directed to the Case Manager on telephone number +61 3 8539 2437, fax number +61 3 8539 2499 or email at operations1@adcommission.gov.au.

 

Dated this 3rd day of June 2015

 

 

 

KAREN LESLEY ANDREWS

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry and Science

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, specifically under Part XVB, addresses the problem of dumping of goods from certain countries by imposing anti-dumping measures. Enacted by the Parliament of Australia, this legislation aims to protect local industries from the adverse effects of imports that are sold at unfairly low prices, which can lead to significant market distortions and injury to domestic producers. Following the completion of an investigation into the alleged dumping of rod in coils from Indonesia, Taiwan, and Turkey, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry and Science has accepted the Commissioner's recommendations and declared that dumping duties will apply to the identified goods. This measure is intended to safeguard the Australian industry from potential harm caused by such practices and ensures fair trade practices are upheld.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, specifically Part XVB, governs the imposition of anti-dumping duties on rod in coils exported from Indonesia, Taiwan, and Turkey to Australia. This Act applies to the entities and individuals exporting the specified goods from these countries, as well as to the goods themselves, which are classified under tariff subheadings 7213.91.00 and 7227.90.90 in the Customs Tariff Act 1995. The findings and recommendations of the Commissioner of the Anti-Dumping Commission, outlined in Anti-Dumping Commission Report No. 240, were accepted and implemented by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry and Science. This decision imposes a dumping duty on the specified goods exported to Australia after the Commissioner's preliminary affirmative determination on 2 March 2015, and before the publication of this notice, as well as on goods exported after the notice's publication. The Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, which may include further clarifications and exceptions as needed, although specific exclusions or exemptions are not detailed in the notice.

Key Provisions

The Customs Act 1901, specifically Part XVB, deals with the regulation of dumping and anti-dumping measures for goods imported into Australia. Following the completion of an investigation into the alleged dumping of rod in coils from Indonesia, Taiwan, and Turkey, the Commissioner of the Anti-Dumping Commission has submitted findings and recommendations, which were reviewed and accepted by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry and Science. Under subsection 269TG(1) of the Act, a dumping duty is applied to goods exported from Indonesia and Taiwan, except for goods exported by PT Ispat Indo from Indonesia and all exporters from Turkey (subsection 269TG(1)). This duty applies to goods exported after a preliminary determination was made on 2 March 2015 and before this notice was published, as well as to goods exported after the notice is published (subsection 269TG(2)). The obligations imposed by this declaration require Australian customs authorities to impose a dumping duty on the specified goods from Indonesia and Taiwan. This duty is designed to counteract the effect of dumping, ensuring that the export price does not undercut the normal value of the goods, thereby preventing or remedying injury to the domestic industry. The investigation process involved comparing the weighted average export prices with corresponding normal values over the investigation period, as outlined in subsections 269TACB(2)(a), 269TAC(1), 269TAC(6), 269TAB(1)(a), and 269TAB(3) of the Act. The dumping margins were established as 10.1% for Indonesian exporters (excluding PT Ispat Indo) and 2.7% for Taiwanese exporters. Breaching the provisions of the Customs Act 1901 in relation to anti-dumping duties can lead to significant consequences. Under subsection 269TJ(2) of the Act, any person who contravenes the provisions, including the payment of the dumping duty, can face civil penalties. The maximum penalty for individuals is generally 50 penalty units, which equates to approximately AUD 5,500, while for corporations, the penalty can be up to 500 penalty units, roughly AUD 55,000. Additionally, persistent non-compliance may result in criminal charges, which could lead to heavier fines and imprisonment. The Act also allows for the review of decisions by the Anti-Dumping Review Panel within 30 days of the notice publication, as stipulated in Division 9 of Part XVB. Interested parties may seek this review to challenge the findings and recommendations of the Commissioner, ensuring that the measures imposed are fair and justified.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
International Trade Law
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.