statutory rules.
1919. No. 189.
REGULATION UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1918.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Defence Act 1903-1918, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this seventeenth day of July, 1919.
R. M. FERGUSON,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
E. J. RUSSELL,
Acting Minister of State for Defence.
Amendment of Financial and Allowance Regulations.
Regulation 201 of Financial and Allowance Regulations for the Australian Military Forces and Senior Cadets is amended as follows:—
(1) Paragraph (d) is amended by deleting the word “except” and substituting the word “including”, and by inserting next after the word “companies” the words “removal contractors”.
(2) Paragraph (g) is amended by deleting the word “receipted”.
(3) Paragraph (h) is amended by adding the following words:—
“and quotations must be obtained from at least three removal contractors for packing, unpacking, and cartage”.
(4) Paragraph (j) is amended by adding the following words:—
“The quotations referred to in para. (h) together with the invoice of the carrier must be attached in support of the amount claimed”
(5) Paragraph (q) is amended to read as follows:—
“If necessary, when a single Officer, Warrant Officer or Non-commissioned Officer is transferred, District Commandants may approve of the payment of the actual cost of transport of excess baggage not exceeding 112 lbs. weight on production of the official railway excess luggage receipts in support of the amount claimed”.
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1919 No. 189, issued under the Defence Act 1903-1918, was enacted to address the need for amendments to the financial and allowance regulations concerning the Australian Military Forces and Senior Cadets. This regulation was introduced by the Governor-General in Council, with the authority of the Federal Executive Council, to ensure more efficient and accountable financial practices within the military context. The policy objective was to streamline and clarify the procedures for obtaining and documenting costs related to the movement and handling of personnel's excess baggage, thereby improving transparency and accountability in financial claims.
Scope and Application
The statutory rules established under the Defence Act 1903-1918, specifically Statutory Rules 1919 No. 189, pertain to the amendment of financial and allowance regulations for the Australian Military Forces and Senior Cadets. This legislation is applicable to military personnel, including officers, warrant officers, and non-commissioned officers, as well as senior cadets, and it governs the financial and allowance regulations related to their service. The scope of these amendments extends to the financial management of removal and transportation services within the military context, particularly in relation to the costs associated with packing, unpacking, and cartage services. These regulations apply on a national level within the Commonwealth of Australia and are enforced through the provisions set out in the Defence Act 1903-1918. The regulations mandate the acquisition of quotations from at least three removal contractors for specific services and require these quotations, along with the carrier’s invoice, to be attached to support any claims for reimbursement. Additionally, district commandants are authorised to approve the payment of actual transport costs for excess baggage under certain conditions, such as the provision of official railway excess luggage receipts. This regulatory framework aims to ensure transparency, accountability, and efficiency in the financial dealings related to military personnel's relocation and transportation needs.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of Statutory Rules 1919 No. 189, which amend the Financial and Allowance Regulations for the Australian Military Forces and Senior Cadets, are contained in Regulation 201. These amendments pertain to specific allowances and financial provisions for military personnel, particularly concerning the costs associated with the relocation of their belongings. Regulation 201(1) alters paragraph (d) by replacing "except" with "including," thereby expanding the scope of who is eligible for these allowances to include removal contractors. Regulation 201(2) removes the word "receipted" from paragraph (g), likely simplifying the documentation requirements for certain expenses. Regulation 201(3) mandates that quotations must be obtained from at least three removal contractors for packing, unpacking, and cartage, ensuring a competitive process for these services. Regulation 201(4) requires that these quotations, along with the carrier's invoice, must be attached to support any amount claimed. Finally, Regulation 201(5) allows District Commandants to approve the payment of the actual cost of transporting excess baggage up to 112 lbs if supported by official railway excess luggage receipts.
The obligations and requirements imposed by these regulations primarily focus on ensuring transparency and accountability in the financial claims related to the relocation of military personnel. Military personnel must now obtain quotations from at least three removal contractors for specific services and provide supporting documentation, including the quotations and the carrier's invoice, when claiming costs. Additionally, District Commandants are tasked with verifying the legitimacy of claims for the transport of excess baggage by requiring official railway excess luggage receipts. This amendment seeks to streamline and formalise the process of claiming relocation costs, ensuring that all claims are adequately substantiated and justified.
For breaches of these regulations, there are no explicit penalties or consequences stated within the text of the statutory rules. However, given the formal and administrative nature of these amendments, non-compliance could potentially lead to the denial of claims or financial penalties at the discretion of the relevant authorities. Additionally, if the regulations are interpreted as part of broader Defence Act provisions, there could be further administrative or disciplinary actions for serious or repeated non-compliance. The lack of specified penalties within this particular statutory rule suggests that the primary enforcement mechanism is the procedural requirement to adhere to the outlined documentation and approval processes.