Finance (Overseas) Regulations (Amendment)

Legislation au C2004L00372 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT No 143

ISSUED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE MINISTER FOR FINANCE

Subject - Audit Act 1901

Finance Regulations (Amendment)

Finance (Overseas) Regulations (Amendment)

Subsection 71(1) of the Audit Act 1901 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations (not inconsistent with the provisions of the Act) for carrying out the provisions of the Act.

Section 63 of the Act provides that the regulations may make provision for and in relation to financial administration by Departments outside Australia.

The attached Statutory Rules amend the Finance Regulations and the Finance (Overseas) Regulations made pursuant to subsection 71(1) and section 63.

The Statutory Rules:-

(a) amend Finance Regulation 6A as a consequence of the amendment made to the definition of “prescribed authority” in section 2 of the Act by the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1987 (the 1987 Act); which extended the definition to allow branches of the Public Service to be prescribed;

(b) amend various Finance Regulations and Finance (Overseas) Regulations as a consequence of the recommendation by the Efficiency Scrutiny on the Processing of Accounts (the Efficiency Scrutiny) that all legislative impediments to the utilization of computer-based systems for the processing of accounts should be eliminated (the Efficiency Scrutiny was established by the Government, as one of the Block Scrutinies, to examine all aspects of accounts processing with the object of ensuring that the most efficient processes were introduced);

(c) amend various Finance Regulations and Finance (Overseas) Regulations as a consequence of the amendment made to section 34 of the Act by the 1987 Act (formerly, that section provided that a Certifying Officer must certify in writing that a payment might properly be made. The amendment provides that, instead of giving a certificate, a Certifying Officer must indicate, in a manner approved in writing by the


Minister for Finance, that payment may properly be made);

(d) amend Finance Regulation 78 as a consequence of the introduction of pre-paid travel for officers within Australia;

(e) amend Finance Regulation 90, by replacing “Warrant Authority” with “Funds Allocation Authority”, as a consequence of amendments made to sections 32 and 33 of the Act by the 1987 Act;

(f) amend Finance Regulation 131, which previously required that officers who dealt with public moneys held complete copies of the Act and its subsidiary legislation, to permit officers to hold only those parts of the Act and its subsidiary legislation that are relevant to their particular duties; and

(g) amend Finance Regulation 133 to increase the penalty for breaching the Regulations from $10 to $500 in line with an amendment to section 71 of the Act made by the Audit Amendment Act 1988.

Details of the above amendments are shown in Attachment A (Amendments to the Finance Regulations) and Attachment B (Amendments to the Finance (Overseas) Regulations.

ATTACHMENT A

AMENDMENTS TO THE FINANCE REGULATIONS

Regulation 1

The amendments in paragraphs (a) and (b) of regulation 1 of the Statutory Rules are as a consequence of those described in regulation 2.

Paragraph (c) amends the definition of “Certifying Officer” in Finance Regulation 4. Previously that definition provided that “Certifying Officer” meant a person appointed under subsection 34(2) of the Act to certify that payments may properly be made.

The amendment to the definition reflects the amendment to section 34 made in the 1987 Act (the amendment to section 34).

Regulation 2

Regulation 2 of the Statutory Rules repeals and replaces Finance Regulation 6A. This regulation lists those bodies which are prescribed authorities for the purposes of the Act and which, as prescribed authorities, come under the definition of “Department” in section 2 of the Act.

As a prescribed authority a body operates, in matters of financial administration, independently of the Department of the Minister who administers the authority; if not prescribed, it would operate as a branch of that Minister’s Department.

The definition of “prescribed authority” in section 2 of the Act was amended by the 1987 Act. The amendment extended the meaning of the term to cover branches of the Public Service, or classes of branches, which are prescribed for the purposes of the definition; previously only corporate or unincorporated bodies could be prescribed. In addition, the amendment to the Act provided for the prescription of bodies which were constituted by legislation (eg the Inter-State Commission); previously only bodies established by legislation could be prescribed.

Prior to the 1987 Act amendments certain branches of the Public Service could not become prescribed authorities. To ensure that these branches were Departments for the purposes of the regulations, they were included in the definition of “Department” in Finance Regulation 4. The branches involved were those in relation to which the


following statutory office holders have the powers of a Departmental Secretary:-

Auditor-General

Commissioner for Superannuation

Commissioner of Taxation

Commonwealth Ombudsman

President of the Inter-State Commission

Supervising Scientist for the Alligator Rivers Region

The amendment to Finance Regulation 6A will include the above branches as prescribed authorities.

Also, the following new entities have been included-

Automotive Industry Authority

Insurance and Superannuation Commission

National Capital Planning Authority

Office of the Parliamentary Counsel

Public Service Commissioner.

Textiles, Clothing and Footwear Development Authority

These entities were established, respectively, by the following Acts:-

Automotive Industry Authority Act 1984

Insurance and Superannuation Commissioner Act 1987

Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Act 1988

Parliamentary Counsel Act 1970

Administrative Arrangements Act 1987

Textiles, Clothing and Footwear Development Authority Act 1988

In view of the functions and duties of each of these entities it is appropriate that they operate independently in matters of financial administration.

The references in Finance Regulation 6A to the Schools Commission and the Curriculum Development Centre have been omitted. These bodies were abolished by the Employment, Education and Training Act 1988.

Regulation 3

Regulation 3 of the Statutory Rules amends Finance Regulation 45 which provides for a Certifying Officer to undertake certain checks before he or she certifies that a payment may properly be made.

Previously, the regulation set out procedures which were appropriate to an accounts processing system which relied on


hard-copies being produced and, in particular, provided that:-

(a) where a voucher was missing, the claim had to be supported by a certificate given by the Secretary of the Department or an authorised officer certifying, inter-alia, that it was not possible to obtain the voucher and, in the case of supplies, that the claim was a reasonable charge against the public funds; and

(b) where the claim was for supplies that it was supported by a certificate by the Secretary of the Department or an authorised officer certifying that the requirements of the agreement relating to the supplies that were to be satisfied to entitle the claimant to payment had been satisfied.

Those provisions impeded the full use of computer-based systems of accounts processing and thus an amendment to regulation 45 was made to give effect to the Efficiency Scrutiny recommendation.

The requirement for the first of the above certificates was removed. The certificate served little purpose, particularly when given by a Certifying Officer (in practice Departmental Secretaries authorised Certifying Officers to give the certificate themselves), because in deciding whether or not a payment may properly be made it could be expected that a Certifying Officer would consider the need for documentary evidence.

However, the second of the above certificates has been replaced with the requirement that a Certifying Officer may indicate that a payment may properly be made only after having taken such steps as are reasonably practicable to establish compliance with the terms of the contract, he or she is satisfied that those requirements have been complied with.

The provision has to be in this form because it is not always possible or practicable for a Certifying Officer to verify the provisions of a contract at first hand. For example, the contract may deal with technical matters or the action necessary to establish the facts is impracticable in the circumstances. What steps are practicable will of course depend on the particular circumstances, however, the provision will allow Certifying Officers to, for example, rely on the advice of an expert or use other indirect means of satisfying themselves of compliance.


Regulations 4 and 6

Regulations 4 and 6 of the Statutory Rules amend Finance Regulations 45A and 56 which deal, respectively, with the certification of those classes of claims for which simplified checking is appropriate and with periodic or progress payments under contracts. Previously, both regulations referred to the written certificates required of Certifying Officers before the amendment of section 34 and provided for certain other written certificates to be given as well.

The amendments to both regulations reflect the amendment to section 34 and provide for the other certificates to be given either in writing, or in such other manner as is approved by the Secretary of the particular Department. The latter amendments are made as a consequence of the Efficiency Scrutiny recommendation

In addition, it is considered that the simplified procedures for checking claims associated with paragraph 45(3)(f) should apply to all claims for less than $1000 and not only to claims for supplies, there being no justification for the current distinction. Accordingly, the reference to supplies has been omitted from that paragraph.

Regulations 5, 7, 8 and 9

Regulations 5, 7, 8 and 9 of the Statutory Rules repeal Finance Regulations 54, 56A, 56AA, 56B and subregulations 59(1) and 60(1) which provided, respectively, that:-

 accounts for general expenses should be in accordance with Form 12;

 a Register of Accounts should be kept;

 an authorised officer should prepare and forward to the Certifying Officer statements of all variations of pay, allowances etc;

 a fortnightly statement should be prepared, in accordance with Form 28, of variations of pay;

 accounts for travelling allowance should be in accordance with Form 12A; and

 petty expenditure should be in accordance with Form 16.

These provisions required either the use of specific forms or for written statements to be given on the various matters


dealt with and thus impeded the use of computer-based systems of processing.

The repeal of the regulations gives effect to the Efficiency Scrutiny recommendation.

Regulation 10

Regulation 10 of the Statutory Rules amends Finance Regulation 61 which provided that refunds of revenue or from the Trust Fund should be made on Form 17 and that certificates were to be given certifying either that the amount had been received or that the claim for refund had been examined and the amount was properly payable.

The amendment to regulation 61-

(a) removed the requirement for refunds of revenue to be made on Form 17; and

(b) amended subregulations (2) and (3) to provide for the necessary certificates to be given either in writing or in such other manner as is approved by the Secretary of the particular Department.

These amendments, which facilitate the use of computer-based systems of processing, were proposed as a consequence of the Efficiency Scrutiny recommendation.

Regulation 11

Regulation 11 of the Statutory Rules repeals Finance Regulations 63A, 64, 65, 71 and 77. These regulations required, respectively, that:-

 pension registers were to be kept in accordance with Form 26;

 duplicate accounts were to be prepared only when the original account had been lost or destroyed;

 certified accounts were to be forwarded to the Authorising Officer;

 authorized accounts were to be forwarded to the Paymaster; and

 for an Authorising Officer to keep a register of advances.


Each of these regulations impeded the full use of computer-based systems and thus they were repealed in line with the Efficiency Scrutiny recommendation.

Regulation 12

Regulation 12 of the Statutory Rules amends Finance Regulation 78 which deals with the adjustment of advances. Paragraph 78(3)(f) required that advances for travelling allowances or expenses incurred within Australia should be adjusted within 14 days of the completion of travel.

New procedures have been introduced for travel within Australia which do not involve the payment of advances to persons travelling; travelling allowance is now an entitlement and as such is not regarded as an advance that has to be recorded and subsequently adjusted. Thus, paragraph 78(3)(f) was redundant and has been repealed.

Regulation 13

Regulation 13 of the Statutory Rules amends Finance Regulation 90 consequent upon amendments made to the Act by the 1987 Act. Those amendments replaced the requirement for the Governor-General to issue Warrant before moneys could be spent from an appropriation, with a requirement that the Minister for Finance allocate appropriated funds before expenditure may take place.

The means by which Departments were advised of the allocation of funds was by Warrant Authority issued by the Secretary to the Department of Finance pursuant to Finance Regulation 90. The term “Warrant Authority” has been replaced by “Funds Allocation Authority” to reflect the changes to the Act.

Regulation 14

Regulation 14 of the Statutory Rules repealed Finance Regulations 94, 103 and 109. These regulations provided, respectively, that:-

 paid claims were to be returned to the Authorising Officer who originally authorised their payment;

 Paymasters were to pay all accounts by cheque drawn on a drawing account; and

 Paymasters were to verify the correctness of cheques drawn against the details of the accounts.


Regulations 94 and 109 have been repealed, in line with the Efficiency Scrutiny recommendation, since they impeded the full utilisation of computer-based systems.

Regulation 103 has been repealed because the former restriction is now unnecessary. Due to changes in systems it is now appropriate, in certain circumstances, for Paymasters to draw cheques directly on accounts other than drawing accounts.

Regulation 15

The amendment to Finance Regulation 127A is consequential upon those to Finance Regulations 4 and 6A.

Regulation 16

Regulation 16 of the Statutory Rules amends Finance Regulation 131 which required accounting officers and other persons dealing with the receipt and payment of moneys to keep copies of all the provisions of the Act, the regulations under the Act and the directions.

The requirement to hold all the provisions meant that officers held details of many provisions which had no relevance to their work. This was wasteful of resources and served no purpose. Accordingly, the amendment provides that only those provisions which are relevant to the duties in question need be held.

Regulation 17

Regulation 17 of these Statutory Rules amends Finance Regulation 133. That regulation provided that if an accounting officer or a person subject to the provisions of the Act committed any breach of the regulations the Minister for Finance could impose a penalty not exceeding ten dollars on that officer or person.

Subsection 71(4) of the Act provides that the regulations may impose a penalty not exceeding $500 on an accounting officer or other person subject to the Act for the breach of any regulation. Previously the limit was set at $10 but this was increased to $500 by an amendment to subsection 71(4) made by the Audit Amendment Act 1988.

The amendment to regulation 133 reflects that change.


Regulation 18

Regulation 18 of the Statutory Rules amends the Schedule to the Finance Regulations by omitting Forms 12, 12A, 16, 17, 24, 26, 28, 28A, 28B and 28C. The amendments are consequential to the amendments made in regulations 5 and 7 to 11 of these Statutory Rules.

ATTACHMENT B

AMENDMENTS TO THE FINANCE (OVERSEAS) REGULATIONS

Regulation 1

Regulation 1 of the Statutory Rules defines “Principal Regulations” as the Finance (Overseas) Regulations (the F(O)Rs).

Regulation 2

Regulation 2 of the Statutory Rules amends F(O)R 2 which defines various of the terms used in the F(O)Rs. The amendments to the definitions of “Department” and “Secretary” reflect the amendments made to those terms in Finance Regulation 4 as a consequence of the amendment of Finance Regulation 6A discussed under the heading “Regulation 2” on page 1 of Attachment A.

The amendment to the definition of “Overseas Certifying Officer” reflects the amendment to section 34. A consequential amendment has also been made to reflect in the definition the amendment to F(O)R 28 made in regulation 5 of these Statutory Rules.

Regulations 3 and 4

Regulations 3 and 4 of the Statutory Rules amend F(O)Rs 12 and 13; these are the overseas equivalents of Finance Regulations 45 and 45A. The amendments mirror those made to those Finance Regulations in the Finance Regulations (Amendment) and are made for the same reasons. (See headings “Regulation 3” and “Regulations 4 and 6” on pages 2 to 4 of Attachment A).

Regulation 5

Regulation 5 of the Statutory Rules amends paragraph 28(3)(b) of the F(O)Rs which provided for a person appointed by the Minister for Finance to certify, in writing, that a payment may properly be made. In line with the amendment to section 34, the paragraph now provides for such a person to indicate, in a manner approved by the Minister, that payment may properly be made.


Regulations 6, 7 and 8

Regulations 6, 7 and 8 of the Statutory Rules amend F(O)Rs 29, 31 and 33. Previously, each of these regulations included reference to the written certificates that Overseas Certifying Officers were required to give prior to the amendment of section 34 of the Act. The amendments reflect in these regulations the amendment to section 34 and that to paragraph 28(3)(b) made by regulation 5 of these Statutory Rules.

Overview

The Audit Act 1901, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, establishes a framework for the audit and financial administration of Commonwealth entities. This Act allows the Governor-General to make regulations for the financial administration by Departments outside Australia, ensuring that financial practices are consistent and transparent. The primary policy objective of the Act is to ensure that the financial administration of the Commonwealth is efficient, effective, and accountable. The attached Statutory Rules amend the Finance Regulations and the Finance (Overseas) Regulations to reflect legislative changes and recommendations from the Efficiency Scrutiny on the Processing of Accounts, which aimed to eliminate impediments to the use of computer-based systems for processing accounts. These amendments also account for changes in the definition of "prescribed authority" and the role of Certifying Officers, as well as the introduction of pre-paid travel for officers within Australia and updated penalty provisions. The changes are designed to streamline financial administration processes and ensure they are fit for purpose in a modern context.

Scope and Application

The Audit Act 1901 applies to the Commonwealth, including its departments and prescribed authorities, as well as to financial administration by departments outside Australia. The Act extends to the financial management and accounting practices within the public service, encompassing various branches and entities established by legislation. The Act applies to all persons and entities involved in the financial administration of Commonwealth funds, including Certifying Officers, accounting officers, and other individuals dealing with public moneys. The application of the Act is facilitated and enforced through subsidiary legislation, namely the Finance Regulations and the Finance (Overseas) Regulations, which have been amended to enhance efficiency and align with contemporary practices. These regulations cover a broad range of financial administrative processes, from the certification of payments and processing of accounts to the handling of advances and refunds. The amendments made to these regulations reflect recommendations from the Efficiency Scrutiny, which aimed to eliminate legislative barriers to the use of computer-based systems for processing accounts. Furthermore, the amendments have been made to reflect changes in the law, such as the substitution of Funds Allocation Authority for Warrant Authority and the introduction of pre-paid travel for officers within Australia. The application of these regulations is not limited by geographic boundaries and extends to financial activities both within Australia and overseas.

Key Provisions

The Audit Act 1901, as amended by the Statutory Rules, contains several key provisions that govern financial administration within Australian departments and prescribed authorities, as well as those operating overseas. The primary sections amended include those relating to prescribed authorities, certification of payments, use of computer-based systems for accounts processing, and adjustments to advances and penalties for breaches of regulations. The statutory rules introduced by these amendments are designed to streamline financial administration, facilitate the use of computer-based systems, and update certain definitions and authorities to reflect current legislative changes. The obligations imposed by these amendments require prescribed authorities and departments to comply with the updated definitions and procedures outlined in the Finance Regulations. For instance, prescribed authorities now include branches of the Public Service, and certain entities have been added or removed from the list of prescribed authorities. Additionally, the role of Certifying Officers has been updated to reflect the changes in certification processes, allowing for more flexible means of certifying payments, such as using approved indirect methods instead of written certificates. The use of computer-based systems for processing accounts is now more feasible, as several provisions that required hard-copy documents or specific forms have been repealed or amended to allow for digital alternatives. Certain Finance Regulations have been amended or repealed to eliminate impediments to the use of computer-based systems, such as the removal of specific form requirements for various financial transactions. The amendments also reflect changes in the process for allocating funds and adjusting advances, particularly for travel-related expenses within Australia. Furthermore, the penalties for breaching the regulations have been updated to reflect the changes in the Act, with the maximum penalty for breaches now set at $500. The statutory rules also impose civil and criminal consequences for non-compliance with the amended regulations. The penalties for breaching the Finance Regulations have been increased, with the maximum penalty now set at $500, up from the previous limit of $10. This change aligns with the amendments made to the Act by the Audit Amendment Act 1988. Non-compliance with the updated procedures and requirements can result in financial penalties and potentially other administrative consequences, depending on the severity and nature of the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Finance & Banking Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.