EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Select Legislative Instrument 2007 No. 345
Issued by the authority of the
Judges of the Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court (Corporations) Amendment Rules 2007 (No 2)
Section 59 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 permits the Judges of the Court or a majority of them, to make rules of Court not inconsistent with the Act. These rules may provide for the practice and procedure to be followed in the Court and in Registries of the Court. They may extend to all matters incidental to any such practice or procedure that are necessary or convenient to be prescribed for the conduct of any business of the Court.
Under sub-section 59 (4) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (other than sections 5, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 16 of that Act) applies in relation to rules of court made by the Court under the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 or another Act:
(a) as if a reference to a legislative instrument were a reference to a rule of court; and
(b) as if a reference to a rule-maker were a reference to the Chief Justice acting on behalf of the Judges of the Court; and
(c) subject to such further modifications or adaptations as are provided for in regulations made under section 59A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976.
The Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 apply to a proceeding in the Court under the Corporations Act 2001 or the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 commenced on or after 1 January 2000.
The Judges have agreed to amend the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 by amending rule 1.4 and forms 1, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15 and 16 in Schedule 1 and inserting a new item in Part 1 of Schedule 2.
The amendments have been the subject of consultation with the Law Council of Australia and give effect to recommendations by the Council of Chief Justices’ Harmonised Corporations Rules Monitoring Committee.
Details of the Rules are in the Attachment.
The Rules commence on the day after they are registered.
Federal Court (Corporations) Amendment Rules 2007 (No 2)
RULE 1 Name of rules
This rule provides that the Rules are to be cited as the Federal Court (Corporations) Amendment Rules 2007 (No 2).
RULE 2 Commencement
This rule provides that these Rules commence on the day after they are registered.
RULE 3 Amendment of Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000
This rule provides that the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 are amended as set out in Schedule 1.
SCHEDULE 1
[1] Rule 1.4, note
[2] Schedule 1, Form 1
[3] Schedule 1, Forms 9, 10, 11, 12, 15 and 16
These amendments insert a reference to the ‘ABN’ in the note to rule 1.4 (which refers to expressions defined in the Corporations Act 2001) and in forms 1, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15 and 16.
The amendment is consequential upon amendments to the Corporations Regulation 2001 which allow an entity to quote its ABN (‘Australian Business Number’) instead of the entity’s ACN or ARBN on public documents and negotiable instruments.
[4] Schedule 2, Part 1
This amendment inserts a new item, 97B, after item 97A in Schedule 2. Schedule 2 sets out the powers of the Court that may be exercised by a Registrar pursuant to a direction by the Court or a Judge under section 35A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Item 97B refers to the power of the Court under subsection 601AH(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 to validate anything done between the deregistration of the company and its reinstatement and make any other order that the Court considers appropriate.
Overview
The Federal Court (Corporations) Amendment Rules 2007 (No 2) were enacted to address the need for updated practices and procedures within the Federal Court of Australia, particularly in relation to corporations. These rules were introduced under the authority of the Judges of the Federal Court of Australia, as permitted by section 59 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, and aim to ensure that the rules are not inconsistent with the Act. The Legislative Instruments Act 2003 applies to these rules, treating them as if they were a legislative instrument, with the Chief Justice acting as the rule-maker. These amendments reflect recommendations from the Council of Chief Justices’ Harmonised Corporations Rules Monitoring Committee and have been subject to consultation with the Law Council of Australia. The rules amend the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 by updating references to the Australian Business Number (ABN) in various forms and rules, aligning with recent changes to the Corporations Regulation 2001. Additionally, the rules introduce a new item in Schedule 2, relating to the Court's power to validate actions taken between a company's deregistration and reinstatement, as per the Corporations Act 2001. These changes aim to streamline corporate proceedings within the Federal Court and ensure they remain current with legislative updates.
Scope and Application
The Federal Court (Corporations) Amendment Rules 2007 (No 2) apply to proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia under the Corporations Act 2001 or the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 that are commenced on or after 1 January 2000. These Rules amend the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 to reflect changes in the Corporations Regulation 2001, which allow entities to use their Australian Business Number (ABN) instead of their Australian Company Number (ACN) or Australian Registered Business Number (ARBN) on public documents and negotiable instruments. The amendments involve updating the note to rule 1.4 and various forms referenced in the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 to include references to the ABN. Additionally, the Rules insert a new item in Schedule 2, which outlines the powers of the Court that may be exercised by a Registrar, to reflect the Court's power under subsection 601AH(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 to validate actions taken between a company's deregistration and reinstatement, and to make any other orders deemed appropriate. These amendments were made following consultation with the Law Council of Australia and in accordance with recommendations from the Council of Chief Justices’ Harmonised Corporations Rules Monitoring Committee.
Key Provisions
The Federal Court (Corporations) Amendment Rules 2007 (No 2) primarily amend the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 by incorporating changes in relation to the Australian Business Number (ABN). Specifically, Rule 3 of the Amendment Rules mandates that the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 are amended as detailed in Schedule 1. This includes inserting references to the 'ABN' in the note to rule 1.4 and in forms 1, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, and 16. These amendments are a result of changes to the Corporations Regulations 2001, which now permit entities to use their ABN instead of their Australian Company Number (ACN) or Australian Registered Business Number (ARBN) on public documents and negotiable instruments.
The obligations imposed by these amendments on parties and entities governed by the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 include ensuring that all public documents and negotiable instruments reflect the use of the ABN as per the Corporations Regulations 2001. Entities must update their records and forms accordingly, ensuring that any references to their ACN or ARBN are replaced with their ABN where required. Additionally, the amendment to Schedule 2, Part 1, by inserting a new item 97B, requires that the Registrar of the Court is informed of any actions taken by a company between its deregistration and reinstatement, as well as any orders made by the Court under the Corporations Act 2001.
Breaches of these rules may lead to various consequences. Although the Amendment Rules do not explicitly detail specific offences or penalties, non-compliance with the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 in general may result in actions such as fines, orders for rectification, or other remedies that the Court deems appropriate. Furthermore, under the Corporations Act 2001, companies that fail to comply with corporate law requirements may face penalties, including fines up to the statutory maximum, which can be significant depending on the nature and seriousness of the breach. It is crucial for entities to adhere to these rules to avoid potential legal repercussions and maintain compliance with federal regulations.