Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No 3)

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2004B00238 CourtRules Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 3) 2004 No. 219

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Statutory Rule 2004 No. 219

Issued by the authority of the Judges of the
Federal Court of Australia

Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 3)

Section 59 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 permits the Judges of the Court or a majority of them, to make rules of Court not inconsistent with the Act. These rules may provide for the practice and procedure to be followed in the Court and in Registries of the Court. They may extend to all matters incidental to any such practice or procedure that are necessary or convenient to be prescribed for the conduct of any business of the Court.

Under sub-section 59 (4) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, sections 48, 48A, 48B, 49 and 50 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 which relate to the making of regulations, apply to these Rules of Court as if references to the regulations in those sections were references to Rules of Court.

The present Federal Court Rules came into operation on 1 August 1979. They are reviewed regularly.

RULE 1 - Name of rules

This rule provides that the rules are the Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 3).

RULE 2 - Commencement

This rule provides that these rules commence on gazettal.

RULE 3 - Amendment of Federal Court Rules

This rule provides that the Federal Court Rules are amended as set out in Schedule 1.

SCHEDULE 1

Entry of orders

[1]       Order 36

This amendment replaces Order 36 with a new Order 36 in order to simplify the process for the entry of orders made by the Federal Court. In particular, the new Order 36 makes it clear that the Court may direct that orders be entered in Court at the time the orders are made.

Rule 1 provides that, for the purposes of rules 3 and 7 of Order 36, 'Registrar' includes an officer acting with the authority of the Registrar.

Subrule 2 (1) provides that, subject to subrule 2 (2), an order must be entered if:

       the order is to be served; or

       the order is to be enforced; or

       an appeal from the order has been instituted, or an application for leave to Appeal from the order has been made; or

       a step is to be taken under the order; or

       the Court directs that the order be entered.

Subrule 2 (2) provides that an order need not be entered if, in addition to any provision as to costs, the order merely:

       extends or abridges time; or

       grants leave or makes a direction to amend a document (other than an order), to file a document or for an act to be done by an officer of the Court (within the meaning of section 18N of the Federal Court of Australia Act); or

       gives directions about the conduct of a proceeding.

Subrule 3 (1) provides that an order may be entered in accordance with subrule 3 (2) or rule 5.

Subrule 3 (2) provides that a Registrar may enter an order by authenticating the order in accordance with subrule 7 (1) if:

       the order has been settled in accordance with rule 4; and

       the Court or a Judge directs, or a party requests, that the order be entered.

Subrule 4 (1) provides that a party wishing to have an order entered may lodge a draft of the order, in accordance with Form 47, with the Registrar.

Subrule 4 (2) provides that an order may be settled by the Court or a Judge, or a Registrar, even if no draft of the order has been lodged under subrule 4 (1).

Subrule 4 (3) provides that the Court or a Judge may give directions to a Registrar who is settling an order under rule 4.

Rule 5 provides that the Court or a Judge may direct that an order be entered by the order being authenticated in Court in accordance with subrule 7 (1) at the time the order is made.

Rule 6 provides that, unless the Court otherwise orders, the date as of which an order is entered is the date when the order was made. This rule clarifies when a judgment is entered for the purposes of section 52 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, which provides that a judgment debt under a judgment of the Court carries interest from the date as of which the judgment is entered. 'Judgment' is defined in section 4 of the Act as meaning 'a judgment, decree or order, whether final or interlocutory, or a sentence'. The rule makes it clear that, unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment is entered on the date on which it is pronounced or made, and not the date on which it is authenticated.

Subrule 7 (1) provides that an order is authenticated by:

       the Court or a Judge, or a Registrar signing the order; and

       the Court or a Judge, or a person at the direction of the Court or a Judge, or a Registrar, affixing the stamp of the Court to the order.

Subrule 7 (2) provides that, on request by a party to a proceeding, the Registrar must give a copy of an authenticated order in the proceeding to the party.

Subrule 7 (3) provides that the Registrar may give a copy of an authenticated order in the proceeding to any person who:

       appears to have a sufficient interest in the proceeding; and

       pays the prescribed fee (if any).

Rule 8 provides that an order need not be served unless the Rules otherwise provide or the Court otherwise directs.

Rule 9 provides that, on request by a judgment creditor, the Registrar must give to the creditor a certificate in accordance with Form 47A setting out the particulars of the judgment.

Amendments to the Schedule 1

[2]       Schedule l, Form 47, heading

Form 47 is amended by inserting a reference to Order 36 rule 4 in the heading of the Form. This amendment is consequential to the amendment to Order 36 described in item [1] above.

[3]       Schedule 1, Form 47A heading

Form 47A is amended by inserting a reference to Order 36 rule 9 in the heading of the Form. This amendment is consequential to the amendment to Order 36 described in item [1] above.

 

Overview

The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 3) were enacted to streamline the process for entering orders made by the Federal Court. Enacted by the Judges of the Federal Court of Australia under the authority granted by section 59 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, these rules aim to clarify and simplify the administrative procedures associated with the entry of court orders. These amendments were introduced to ensure that the rules of the Court align with modern judicial practices, facilitating efficiency and clarity in the execution of court orders. This aligns with the overarching policy objective of enhancing the operational effectiveness of the Federal Court, thereby improving the overall judicial process.

Scope and Application

The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 3) applies to the practice and procedure of the Federal Court of Australia, as established under the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976. These rules are designed to amend the existing Federal Court Rules, specifically relating to the entry and authentication of orders made by the Court. The rules apply to all proceedings before the Court and its registries, impacting both the Court's internal processes and the procedures followed by parties involved in litigation. The amendments are applicable on a national level, affecting all federal court proceedings across Australia. Notably, these rules do not apply to state or territory courts, and they do not set substantive legal standards but rather procedural ones. The rules are made under the authority of the Judges of the Federal Court and are subject to the limitations and constraints outlined in the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 and the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. While the primary text of the rules provides the foundational amendments, additional practices and procedures may be prescribed through subordinate instruments issued by the Court.

Key Provisions

The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 3) principally revise the process for the entry of orders made by the Federal Court, as detailed in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules (paragraph 1). The primary change introduced by these amendments is the simplification of the order entry process. Specifically, Order 36 now explicitly allows the Court to direct that orders be entered at the time they are made (subrule 2 (1)). An order must be entered if it is to be served, enforced, if an appeal has been instituted or if a step is to be taken under the order. However, an order does not need to be entered if it merely extends or abridges time, grants leave or makes a direction to amend a document, or gives directions about the conduct of a proceeding (subrule 2 (2)). Furthermore, an order can be entered in accordance with subrule 3 (2) if it has been settled and the Court or a Judge directs, or a party requests, that the order be entered. Alternatively, the Court or a Judge can direct that an order be entered by authenticating the order in Court in accordance with subrule 7 (1) at the time the order is made (Rule 5). These amendments impose certain obligations on the parties and the Court. Firstly, parties wishing to have an order entered must lodge a draft of the order with the Registrar (subrule 4 (1)). The Court or a Judge may also give directions to a Registrar who is settling an order (subrule 4 (3)). Additionally, the Court or a Judge, or a Registrar, must authenticate the order by signing it and affixing the Court's stamp (subrule 7 (1)). The Registrar must then provide a copy of an authenticated order to the party upon request (subrule 7 (2)) and may provide a copy to any person with a sufficient interest in the proceeding who pays the prescribed fee (subrule 7 (3)). The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 3) do not explicitly state any specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches of the amended rules. However, any breaches of the Federal Court Rules, including these amendments, could potentially result in sanctions under the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 or other applicable laws. For example, failing to comply with a Court order could result in contempt of court, which is an offence under section 130 of the Act and can be punished by a fine or imprisonment. Similarly, any misuse of Court processes could potentially result in penalties under other relevant legislation, such as the *Misuse of Drugs Act 1981* or the *Competition and Consumer Act 2010*. The precise consequences would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as any other applicable laws.

Legal classification tags

Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.