Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No 2)

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2004B00120 CourtRules Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 2) 2004 No. 98

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Statutory Rules 2004 No. 98

Issued by the authority of the
Judges of the Federal Court of Australia

Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 2)

Section 59 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 permits the Judges of the Court or a majority of them, to make rules of Court not inconsistent with the Act. These rules may provide for the practice and procedure to be followed in the Court and in Registries of the Court. They may extend to all matters incidental to any such practice or procedure that are necessary or convenient to be prescribed for the conduct of any business of the Court.

Under sub-section 59 (4) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, sections 48, 48A, 48B, 49 and 50 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 which relate to the making of regulations, apply to these Rules of Court as if references to the regulations in those sections were references to Rules of Court.

The present Federal Court Rules came into operation on 1 August 1979. They are reviewed regularly.

RULE 1 - Name of rules

This rule provides that the rules are the Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 2).

RULE 2 - Commencement

This rule provides that these rules commence on gazettal.

RULE 3 - Amendment of Federal Court Rules

This rule provides that the Federal Court Rules are amended as set out in Schedule 1.

SCHEDULE 1

Short form bill for migration cases

These amendments provide for a short form bill to be used in certain migration cases. The short form bill will provide a quick and efficient mechanism for determining the amount of costs to be paid pursuant to a costs order in less complex matters concerning the review of decisions under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).

The amendments were the subject of consultations with the Law Council of Australia and the Department of Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs.

[1]       Order 62, subrule 8 (2)

This amendment replaces the words 'rule 40A' with 'rule 40A or 40B'. The amendment is consequential to the insertion of Order 62 rule 40B.

[2]       Order 62, after rule 40A

This amendment inserts a new rule 40B, which provides for short form bills in certain migration cases.

Subrule 40B (1) contains definitions of 'migration case', 'migration court book' and 'standard migration case' for the purposes of the rule.

Subrule 40B (2) provides that a party to a standard migration case may claim as costs of the proceeding, including disbursements, the amount that, on the date when the proceeding was commenced, was the prescribed amount in item 43D in Schedule 2.

Subrule 40B (3) provides that the respondent to a migration case that is discontinued or dismissed after the applicant has been served with the migration court book and before the trial, may claim as costs of the proceeding, including disbursements, the amount that, on the date when the proceeding was commenced, was the prescribed amount in item 43E in Schedule 2.

Subrule 40B (4) provides that a party who claims costs under this rule (claimant) must serve on the other party a bill of costs, including disbursements, (bill), which need not include an itemised account of:

       the work or services performed; or

       the disbursements incurred in relation to the proceeding.

Subrule 40B (5) provides that within 14 days of being served with a bill under subrule 40B (4), the party served with the bill must advise the claimant, in writing, if he or she objects to the claim being made under this rule.

Subrule 40B (6) provides that within 14 days or receiving an advice under subrule 40B (5), the claimant must file a copy of the following documents:

       the advice;

       the bill served on the other party under subrule (4);

       the affidavit of service of the bill on the other party.

Subrule 40B (7) provides that the claimant and the other party and their respective solicitors must not attend on taxation of the bill, unless directed to do so by the taxing officer.

Subrule 40B (8) provides that this rule does not limit a party's right to claim the taxed costs of the proceeding under Order 62.

However, paragraph 40B (9) (a) provides that a party who claims costs under this rule has no further claim to recover any of the taxed costs of the proceeding under Order 62. Paragraph 40B (9) (b) provides that a party who claims costs otherwise under Order 62 has no further claim to recover any of the taxed costs of the proceeding under this rule.

[3]       Schedule 2, after item 43C

This amendment inserts two new items in Schedule 2. Item 43D is the prescribed amount that may be claimed by a party pursuant to subrule 40B (2). Item 43E is the prescribed amount that may be claimed by a party pursuant to subrule 40B (3).

 

Overview

The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 2) were enacted to introduce efficiency in the Federal Court's handling of certain migration cases. Authorised by the Judges of the Federal Court of Australia under section 59 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, these amendments were designed to streamline the process for determining costs in less complex migration cases. This is achieved by allowing for a simplified bill of costs, thereby reducing the procedural burden on both the Court and the parties involved. These amendments reflect a policy objective to ensure that the Federal Court operates in a manner that is both effective and responsive to the needs of the parties, particularly in the context of migration cases that are less intricate and can be resolved more efficiently. The amendments were developed in consultation with relevant stakeholders, including the Law Council of Australia and the Department of Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs.

Scope and Application

The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 2) apply to all proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia and its registries, specifically targeting the practice and procedure in migration cases as outlined in the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). The amendment introduces a short form bill mechanism intended to expedite the determination of costs in less complex migration review cases. This applies to individuals and entities involved in migration cases, including applicants, respondents, and their legal representatives. The rules come into effect upon gazettal and are intended to streamline the process for claiming costs, ensuring that the court can efficiently manage these proceedings. However, the rules do not alter the fundamental rights of parties to claim costs under other provisions of the Federal Court Rules, thus maintaining the flexibility and comprehensiveness of the existing legal framework. The scope of these amendments is confined to the procedural aspects of cost determinations in migration cases, with no stated exclusions, ensuring that the amendments apply uniformly across all relevant proceedings within the Federal Court’s jurisdiction.

Key Provisions

The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2004 (No. 2) include significant amendments to the Federal Court Rules, specifically targeting the process of determining costs in migration cases. Rule 3 of the Amendment Rules provides for amendments to the Federal Court Rules as outlined in Schedule 1. The primary changes are introduced via Order 62, subrule 8 (2) and the addition of Order 62 rule 40B. Order 62, subrule 8 (2) modifies an existing rule to include references to both rule 40A and a newly introduced rule 40B, thereby integrating the short form bill process into the existing framework. The obligations imposed by these amendments are primarily on the parties involved in migration cases. According to Order 62 rule 40B, a party in a standard migration case may claim prescribed costs, which are defined in Schedule 2, item 43D. Similarly, the respondent in a case that is discontinued or dismissed may claim prescribed costs as defined in Schedule 2, item 43E. To claim these costs, the party must serve a bill of costs on the other party, which does not need to include an itemised account of the work performed or disbursements incurred. The other party then has 14 days to object in writing if they disagree with the claim. The claimant must subsequently file certain documents within 14 days of receiving the objection or lack thereof. Additionally, parties and their solicitors are generally not required to attend the taxation of the bill unless directed by the taxing officer. The amendments also introduce specific consequences for non-compliance with the new rules. While the rules do not explicitly outline criminal or civil penalties for breach, they do clarify the financial implications of the cost claims. Under Order 62 rule 40B (9), a party who claims costs under this rule is precluded from claiming any further costs under Order 62 for the same proceeding. Conversely, a party who claims costs under Order 62 cannot claim any costs under rule 40B. These provisions ensure that the use of the short form bill process does not overlap with the standard costs recovery process under Order 62, thereby maintaining the integrity and efficiency of the cost recovery mechanism in migration cases.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Instrument
Rules
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.