Federal Court Amendment Rules 2000 (No 4)

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2001B00555 CourtRules Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Federal Court Amendment Rules 2000 (No. 4) 2000 No. 233

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Statutory Rule 2000 No. 233

Issued by the authority of the Judges of the Federal Court of Australia

Federal Court Amendment Rules 2000 (No. 4)

Section 59 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 permits the Judges of the Court or a majority of them, to make rules of Court not inconsistent with the Act. These rules may provide for the practice and procedure to be followed in the Court and in Registries of the Court. They may extend to all matters incidental to any such practice or procedure that are necessary or convenient to be prescribed for the conduct of any business of the Court.

Under sub-section 59(4) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, sections 48, 48A, 48B, 49 and 50 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 which relate to the making of regulations, apply to these Rules of Court as if references to the regulations in those sections were references to Rules of Court.

The present Federal Court Rules came into operation on 1 August 1979. They are reviewed regularly.

RULE 1 - Name of rules

This rule provides that the rules are the Federal Court Amendment Rules 2000 (No. 4).

RULE 2 - Commencement

This rule provides that these Rules commence on gazettal.

RULE 3 - Amendment of Federal Court Rules

This rule provides that the Federal Court Rules are amended as set out in Schedule 1.

SCHEDULE 1 - Amendments

Scandalous, vexatious or oppressive matters

[1]       Order 41, rule 5

Order 41 rule 5 provides that the Court may strike out from a document any matter that is scandalous, vexatious or oppressive. The amendment replaces the rule with a new rule 5 which retains this power, and allows the Court to order that any document that contains scandalous, vexatious or oppressive matter be removed from the file.

Bankruptcy Proceedings

[2]       Order 77, subrule 13 (4)

Order 77 subrule 13(2) provides that an application to set aside, or to extend the time for complying with, a bankruptcy notice must be accompanied by a copy of the notice, an affidavit and a copy of any application to set aside the judgment or order in relation to which the bankruptcy notice was issued.

Subrule 13(4) provides that the application must be served on the respondent creditor - it makes no reference to the "accompanying documents" having to be served. The amendment to subrule 13(4) expressly requires the applicant to serve the "accompanying documents" as well as the application itself.

[3]       Order 77, paragraph 16 (2) (a)

This amendment removes the requirement under paragraph 16(2)(a) that a creditor's petition must be "accompanied by" (that is, filed with) sufficient copies of the petition for annexure to any affidavits of service. It is unnecessary to annex a stamped copy of the petition to an affidavit of service - a photocopy of the stamped copy that was served will be sufficient.

[4]       Order 77, paragraph 18 (1) (c)

Under Order 77 paragraph 18(1)(c), an affidavit verifying a petition founded on an act of bankruptcy under paragraph 40(1)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 has to state that the Court records had been searched and that no application in relation to the bankruptcy notice had been made.

Paragraph 18(1)(c) is amended to provide that the affidavit must state that the records of both the Federal Court and the Federal Magistrates Court have been searched for any application having been made in relation to the bankruptcy notice. The amendment follows from the Federal Magistrates Court having concurrent jurisdiction with the Federal Court in applications under the Bankruptcy Act.

[5]       Order 77, after rule 18

This amendment inserts a new rule 18A which provides that the applicant creditor must serve on the respondent debtor

(a)       the creditor's petition;

(b)       a copy of the affidavit verifying the petition required by subsection 47(1) of the Bankruptcy Act;

(c)       where applicable, a copy of the affidavit of service of the bankruptcy notice required by subrule 18(2);

(d)       a copy of any order to which subrule 18(3) applies; and

(e)       a copy of any consent to act as trustee lodged under section 156A of the Act

at least five days before the date appointed for hearing, unless the Court otherwise orders.

[6]       Order 77, subrule 19 (2)

Order 77 subrule 19(2) requires the applicant creditor to file various affidavits before the hearing of the petition, including an affidavit stating that the creditor's petition, the affidavit verifying the petition required by section 47(1) of the Bankruptcy Act, and any consent to act as trustee lodged under section 156A of that Act have been served and how they were served. However, the subrule does not require proof that an affidavit of service of the bankruptcy notice, required by subrule 18(2), has itself been served.

To resolve this omission the amendment replaces the subrule with a new subrule 19(2) which provides that the applicant creditor must file an affidavit stating that documents required to be served under rule 18A have been served, and how and when they were served.

Human Rights Proceedings

[7]       Order 8 1, rule 7, note

This amendment omits the note appearing after Order 81 rule 7. The note referred to Order 11 rule 20 in relation to the time in which a defence to an application alleging unlawful discrimination must be filed.

Statement of person responsible for pleadings

[8]       Schedule 1, Forms 7, 8, 9 and 10, at the foot

[9]       Schedule 1, Forms 16, 17 and 18, at the foot

Order 11 rule 1 A of the Federal Court Rules provides that a pleading must set out the name of the person who prepared the pleading and include a statement by that person that the person prepared the pleading. The amendments to Forms 7, 8, 9, 10, 16, 17 and 18 help give effect to this rule.

Human Rights forms

[10]       Schedule 1, Form 167, clause 12

Form 167 is the prescribed form for an Application under the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 Alleging Unlawful Discrimination.

Order 81 subrule 5(2) provides that an application must be accompanied by an affidavit in support of the application. However, clause 12 of Form 167 asks the applicant to attach the affidavit to the application. The amendment removes this inconsistency by replacing the words "You must attach" with "Your application must be accompanied by".

[11]       Schedule 1, Form 167, clause 15

Clause 15 is amended to make it clear that the 28 day time limit for filing an application begins from the date on which the President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission issues the notice terminating the complaint.

[12]       Schedule 1, Form 167, clause 16

Clause 16 asked the applicant to indicate where notices from the Court should be sent.

The amendment replaces this clause with a new clause 16 which asks the applicant to indicate the address to which documents in the proceedings are to be left or posted for the applicant. That is, the applicant is asked to indicate his or her address for service. The documents may be sent to that address by the Court and the other parties to the proceedings.

[13]       Schedule 1, Form 167, clause 17

Order 81 subrule 5(2) provides that an application must be accompanied by an affidavit in support of the application. However, clause 17 of Form 167 asks the applicant to attach the affidavit, and certain other documents, to the application. The amendment removes this inconsistency by replacing the words "You must attach" with "Your application must be accompanied by".

[14]       Schedule 1, Form 167, item 18 including the heading

Item 18 asked the applicant whether a report was being prepared by the President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. The amendment removes this item as it is unnecessary given that the President will not prepare a report until a proceeding has commenced.

[15]       Schedule 1, Form 167

This amendment inserts the applicant's name and signature, and the date of the application, immediately after the details of the application.

[16]       Schedule 1, Form 167

This amendment omits the applicant's name and signature, and the date of the application, from the foot of Form 167 and inserts the details of where and when the Court will hear the application, the date the application is filed, and signature of the Registrar issuing the application.

[17] Schedule 1, Form 168, clause 9

Form 168 is the prescribed form for a Defence to Application under the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 Alleging Unlawful Discrimination.

Clause 9 asked the respondent to indicate where notices from the Court should be sent.

The amendment replaces this clause with a new clause 9 which asks the respondent to indicate the address to which documents in the proceedings are to be left or posted for the respondent. That is, the respondent is asked to indicate his, her or its address for service. The documents may be sent to that address by the Court and the other parties to the proceedings.

[18] Schedule 1, Form 168, clause 10

Order 81 subrule 7(2) provides that a defence must be accompanied by an affidavit in support of the grounds of defence. However, clause 10 of Form 168 asks the respondent to attach the affidavit to the defence. The amendment removes this inconsistency by replacing the words "You must attach" with "Your defence must be accompanied by".

 

Overview

The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2000 (No. 4) were enacted to address procedural gaps and inconsistencies within the Federal Court of Australia's existing rules, specifically concerning bankruptcy proceedings, scandalous, vexatious or oppressive matters, and human rights proceedings. Authorised by the Judges of the Federal Court under section 59 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, these amendments aim to streamline and clarify the procedural requirements for filing and serving documents, thereby ensuring more efficient and fair administration of justice. The amendments respond to practical issues identified in the court's operations, such as the need to clarify the handling of scandalous, vexatious or oppressive content in documents, and to update requirements in bankruptcy proceedings in light of changes in jurisdictional scope and practice.

Scope and Application

The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2000 (No. 4) applies to the Federal Court of Australia and its registries, and pertains to amendments made to the Federal Court Rules 1979, which govern practice and procedure within the Court. These rules apply to all parties involved in proceedings before the Court, including individuals and entities. The scope of the amendments includes provisions related to scandalous, vexatious or oppressive matters, bankruptcy proceedings, human rights proceedings, and the statement of persons responsible for pleadings. The Rules affect the entire Commonwealth of Australia as they pertain to federal law and the Federal Court's jurisdiction. The amendments may extend or restrict application through subordinate instruments, although specific details are not provided in the Explanatory Statement. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions, and the rules apply to all relevant matters without thresholds. The primary focus of these amendments is to ensure consistency with statutory requirements and to streamline procedural aspects of various types of cases handled by the Court.

Key Provisions

The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2000 (No. 4) make several significant amendments to the Federal Court Rules, which govern the practice and procedure of the Federal Court of Australia. These amendments are set out in Schedule 1 of the Amendment Rules and touch on various procedural aspects of court filings and hearings, especially in bankruptcy and human rights proceedings. For bankruptcy proceedings, the amendments address several areas. Firstly, Order 41, Rule 5 has been updated to allow the Court to not only strike out scandalous, vexatious, or oppressive matter from a document but also to order that any document containing such matter be removed from the file. This provides the Court with greater flexibility in handling inappropriate content within documents. Secondly, Order 77, subrule 13(4) now requires that applications to set aside or extend the time for complying with a bankruptcy notice be accompanied by, and served with, the requisite supporting documents, ensuring all necessary information is provided to the respondent creditor. Thirdly, the requirement for a creditor's petition to be "accompanied by" sufficient copies for annexure to affidavits of service has been removed, allowing a photocopy of the stamped copy served to suffice. Fourthly, the amendment to Order 77, paragraph 18(1)(c) mandates that the affidavit verifying a petition must state that both Federal Court and Federal Magistrates Court records have been searched, reflecting the concurrent jurisdiction of the Federal Magistrates Court. Additionally, a new rule 18A has been inserted, requiring the applicant creditor to serve specified documents on the respondent debtor at least five days before the hearing date unless the Court orders otherwise. Finally, Order 77, subrule 19(2) has been amended to ensure that an affidavit proving service of the documents required by rule 18A must be filed before the hearing. The amendments also make several changes to human rights proceedings. The note in Order 81, Rule 7, which referred to the time for filing a defence in discrimination cases, has been omitted. Amendments to Forms 7, 8, 9, 10, 16, 17, and 18 ensure compliance with the requirement that pleadings must state the name of the person who prepared them and include a statement by that person confirming their preparation. Form 167, the application form for alleging unlawful discrimination, has several changes: clause 12 now correctly states that an affidavit must be accompanied by the application, clause 15 clarifies the commencement of the 28-day filing period, clause 16 asks the applicant to indicate their address for service, and clause 17 similarly corrects the requirement for accompanying documents. Item 18, which asked whether a report was being prepared by the President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, has been removed as it is unnecessary. The applicant's name, signature, and the date of the application have been moved to immediately follow the application details, while the details of the Court hearing, the filing date, and the Registrar's signature have been placed at the foot of the form. Form 168, the defence form, has had clause 9 amended to ask the respondent to indicate their address for service, and clause 10 corrected to state that an affidavit must be accompanied by the defence. The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2000 (No. 4) impose obligations on parties and entities involved in bankruptcy and human rights proceedings, requiring them to follow specific procedural steps and provide accurate and complete documentation. For bankruptcy proceedings, creditors must serve the required documents on debtors well in advance of the hearing, and ensure all accompanying documents are correctly served and filed. For human rights proceedings, applicants and respondents must correctly complete and sign forms, provide affidavits where necessary, and indicate their addresses for service. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in delays, additional costs, or other procedural disadvantages. The Federal Court Amendment Rules 2000 (No. 4) do not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance. However, non-compliance with court rules and procedures can lead to a range of adverse outcomes, including the dismissal of applications or petitions, default judgments, and other procedural sanctions. These consequences are determined by the Court and can vary depending on the circumstances of each case.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Repeal & Amendment
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.