Federal Circuit Court Amendment (Costs and Other Measures) Rules 2016

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2016L00818 CourtRules Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

 

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

 

Issued by the authority of the Judges of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia

 

 

Federal Circuit Court Amendment (Costs and Other Measures) Rules 2016

 

Authority for Federal Circuit Court Rules

Section 81 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 permits the Judges of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (Federal Circuit Court) or a majority of them, to make Rules of Court not inconsistent with the Act. These rules may provide for the practice and procedure to be followed in the Court and may extend to all matters incidental to any such practice or procedure that are necessary or convenient to be prescribed for the conduct of any business of the Court.

 

Under sub-section 81(3) of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999, the Legislation Act 2003 (other than sections 8, 9, 10 and 16 of that Act) applies in relation to rules of court made by the Court under the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 or another Act:

 

(a) as if a reference to a legislative instrument were a reference to a rule of court; and

(b) as if a reference to a rule-maker were a reference to the Chief Judge acting on behalf of the Judges of the Court; and

(c) subject to such further modifications or adaptations as are provided for in regulations made under section 120 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999.

 

General outline of amendments

 

The Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (“the Rules”) are reviewed regularly. The judges have

agreed to a number of miscellaneous amendments which are comprised in these Amendment

Rules.

 

The amendments in Part 1 increase the itemised amounts of costs comprised in Schedule 1 of

the Rules. These increases follow recommendations made by the Joint Costs Advisory

Committee in their 7th and 8th report.

 

The amendments in Part 2 comprise other miscellaneous amendments to the Rules including:

 

  • An amendment which inserts a new paragraph (ba) to subrule 2.08(1)(b) extending the list of person who, in family law/child support proceedings, can search the court records to a child welfare officer of a State or Territory, if the case affects or may affect the welfare of a child. This amendment is consistent with a recent amendment to section 121(9) of the Family Law Act 1975 which now specifically exempts from the general restriction on publication of family law proceedings the communication of certain documents to prescribed welfare authorities. The amendment to subrule 2.08 is intended to facilitate the sharing of relevant court records with child welfare officers and is consistent with amendments previously made to paragraph 23.01A(5)(a)(iii) of the Rules to facilitate the sharing of family reports.

 

  • An amendment to the response rules. The amendment makes no substantive change to the rules but better clarifies the procedural requirements by combining the requirements previously set out in repealed rules 4.03 and 4.04 into a consolidated rule 4.03.
  • Rules 13.11 and 13.11A set out procedural requirements in respect of certificate of vexatious proceedings orders and applications for leave to institute proceedings in respect of such orders. The amendment made by these items is the inclusion of a reference to the relevant Family Law Act provisions whenever reference is made to the relevant Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act provision.  This ensures the application of these rules to family law proceedings as well as general federal law proceedings.
  • Rule 22.01 applies the prescribed rate of interest for certain Family Law Act provisions as the rate prescribed by the Family Law Rules for those provisions. The amendment to this rule reflects a recent amendment to rule 17.03 of the Family Law Rules by referring to paragraphs 87(11)(b), 90KA(b) and 90UN(b) as well as subsection 117B(1) of the Act.

 

  • Amendments to Part 25A (rules in respect of child support and child maintenance) as a consequence of the amendments made by the Tribunals Amalgamation Act 2015.  This Act merged a number of Tribunals under the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The merger established the Social Services and Child Support Division of the AAT which took over the jurisdiction of the Social Security Appeals Tribunal (SSAT). The SSAT was abolished at the commencement of the Tribunals Amalgamation Act 2015.  The source of jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit Court in relation to judicial review of child support matters is now found in section 44AAA of the AAT Act.  New paragraph 25A.01(1)(aa) now makes specific reference to section 44AAA to clarify the application of rules in respect of judicial review of child support matters within Part 25A. References in rules 25A.03, 25A.05, 25A.06 and 25A.07 to the SSAT have been replaced with reference to the Tribunal which is defined in the dictionary to mean the AAT. Paragraph 25A.07(1)(d) has been amended to remove reference to the Executive Director of the SSAT. The position of Executive Director of the SSAT has been abolished and accordingly paragraph 25A.07(1)(d) now prescribes the Registrar of the Tribunal as the person on whom a notice should be served.

 

  • Rule 43.01 has also been amended to reflect the structural changes to the AAT following the merger of the Tribunals. Previously the term Registrar of the Tribunal for the purposes of Part 42 was defined to include the District Registrar or Deputy Registrar of the AAT or an officer for the time being performing the duties of such. The amendments made to the structure of the AAT removed references to District and Deputy Registrars. Accordingly it has been necessary to make amendments to rule 43.01 and insert a new definition of Registrar of the Tribunal within the dictionary to the Rules to preserve consistency with the new legal framework of the AAT following the merger of the Tribunals.

 

  • Rule 44.15 which provides for costs in relation to migration proceedings has been repealed and replaced to better clarify the processes when a notice of discontinuance is filed in a proceeding in which a respondent has sought costs in the response. The amendment is intended to facilitate the current procedures by providing for orders for costs in accordance with Division 2 of Part 3 of Schedule 1  to be made in chambers without hearing the parties.

 

Consultation

 

The Federal Circuit Court consulted with the Federal Court and relevant officers from the AAT in relation to the changes as a consequence of the merger of the Tribunals. In respect of the amendments to increase the amount of itemised costs set out in Schedule 1 of the Rules, there was no consultation as the increases were consistent with the recommendations of the Joint Costs Advisory Committee as set out in their 7th and 8th Reports. That Committee consults as part of its annual review of costs. The amendment to rule 44.15 which provides for costs in relation to migration proceedings followed consultation with members of the profession and registrars of the Federal Court who had been experiencing difficulties with the practical implementation of the previously prescribed rule. As the other amendments introduce no substantive changes to the practices and procedures, detailed consultation was unnecessary.

 

Human Rights Scrutiny

 

Subsection 8(8) of the Legislation Act provides that Rules of Court made for the Federal Circuit Court are not legislative instruments for the purposes of that Act. As a result the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 does not apply to any such Rules of Court and no statement of compatibility for the purposes of that latter Act is included in this Explanatory Statement.

 

Explanation and Commencement of the Rules

 

Details of the Rules are in the Attachment.

 

The Rules commence on the day after registration.


Federal Circuit Court Amendment (Costs and Other Measures) Rules 2016

 

ATTACHMENT

 

Part 1 - Costs

 

[1] Repeal the Schedule

 

Schedule 1 is repealed and a new costs schedule which increases the itemised amounts of costs as recommended by the Joint Costs Advisory Committee in their 7th report (which recommended a 2.7% increase) and their 8th report (which recommended a 2.8% increase).

 

Part 1A provides that these increases apply to work done or services performed after the commencement of the Schedule.

 

Part 2 - Other Amendments

 

[2] After paragraph 2.08(1)(b)

 

An amendment which inserts a new paragraph (ba) to subrule 2.08(1)(b) extending the list of person who, in family law/child support proceedings, can search the court records to a child welfare officer of a State or Territory, if the case affects or may affect the welfare of a child. This amendment is consistent with a recent amendment to section 121(9) of the Family Law Act 1975 which now specifically exempts from the general restriction on publication of family law proceedings the communication of certain documents to prescribed welfare authorities. The amendment to subrule 2.08 is intended to facilitate the sharing of relevant court records with child welfare officers and is consistent with amendments previously made to paragraph 23.01A(5)(a)(iii) of the Rules to facilitate the sharing of family reports.

 

[3] Rules 4.03 and 4.04

 

An amendment to the response rules. The amendment makes no substantive change to the rules but better clarifies the procedural requirements by combining the requirements previously set out in repealed rules 4.03 and 4.04 into a consolidated rule 4.03.

 

[4] Subrule 13.11(1)

[5]  Rule 13.11A

[6]  Rule 13.11A (note 1)

[7]  Rule 13.11A (note 2)

Rules 13.11 and 13.11A set out procedural requirements in respect of certificate of vexatious proceedings orders and applications for leave to institute proceedings in respect of such orders. The amendment made by these items is the inclusion of a reference to the relevant Family Law Act provisions whenever reference is made to the relevant Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act provision.  This ensures the application of these rules to family law proceedings as well as general federal law proceedings.

 

[8] Rule 22.01

Rule 22.01 applies the prescribed rate of interest for certain Family Law Act provisions as the rate prescribed by the Family Law Rules for those provisions. The amendment to this rule reflects a recent amendment to rule 17.03 of the Family Law Rules by referring to paragraphs 87(11)(b), 90KA(b) and 90UN(b) as well as subsection 117B(1) of the Act.

 

[9]  After paragraph 25A.01(1)(a)

[10]  Subparagraph 25A.03(1)(a)(ii)

[11]  Paragraph 25A.03(2)(a)

[12]  Rule 25A.05 (heading)

[13]  Subrule 25A.05(1)

[14]  Paragraph 25A.05(1)(a)

[15]  Subrule 25A.05(3)

[16]  Subrule 25A.06(1)

[17]  Subrule 25A.06(2)

[18] At the end of rule 25A.06

[19]  Paragraph 25A.07(1)(d)

[20]  Subrule 25A.07(3)

[21]  Rule 25A.07 (note 3)

[22] At the end of paragraph 25B.10(d)

[23] Rule 25B.10 (at the end of the note)

 

The amendments contained in items [9-23] are to Part 25A (rules in respect of child support and child maintenance) as a consequence of the Tribunals Amalgamation Act 2015 which merged a number of Tribunals under the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The merger established the Social Services and Child Support Division of the AAT which took over the jurisdiction of the Social Security Appeals Tribunal (SSAT). The SSAT was abolished at the commencement of the Act.  The source of jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit Court in relation to judicial review of child support matters is now found in new section 44AAA of the AAT Act.  Accordingly new paragraph 25A.01(1)(aa) now makes specific reference to section 44AAA to clarify the application of rules in respect of judicial review of child support matters within Part 25A. References in rules 25A.03, 25A.05, 25A.06 and 25A.07 to the SSAT have been replaced with reference to the Tribunal which is defined in the dictionary to the rules to mean the AAT.

 

Paragraph 25A.07(1)(d) has been amended to remove reference to the Executive Director of the SSAT. The position of Executive Director of the SSAT has been abolished and accordingly paragraph 25A.07(1)(d) now prescribes the Registrar of the Tribunal as the person on whom a notice should be served. This items should be read in conjunction with item [30] which introduces a new dictionary definition of Registrar of the Tribunal.

 

[24] Part 43 (before the note to Part heading)

 

The amendment inserts a new note under the heading of part 43 to clarify that part 25A applies to appeals under section 44AAA of the AAT Act.

 

[25] Part 43 (note to Part heading)

This is a minor drafting amendment in light of the additional note referred to in the above item.

[26] Rule 43.01

 

Rule 43.01 has also been amended to reflect the structural changes to the AAT following the merger of the Tribunals. Previously the term Registrar of the Tribunal for the purposes of Part 42 was defined to include the District Registrar or Deputy Registrar of the AAT or an officer for the time being performing the duties of such. The amendments made to the structure of the AAT removed references to District and Deputy Registrars. Accordingly it has been necessary to make amendments to rule 43.01 and insert a new definition of Registrar of the Tribunal which is now defined in the dictionary to the Rules.  This preserves consistency with the new legal framework of the AAT following the merger of the Tribunals.

 

[27]  Subrule 44.06(2) (note)

 

This amendment to the Note is as a consequence of the consolidation of the rules in relation to the response in item [3].

 

[28] Rule 44.15

 

Rule 44.15 which provides for costs in relation to migration proceedings has been repealed and

 replaced to better clarify the processes when a notice of discontinuance is filed in a proceeding

 in which a respondent has sought costs in the response. The amendment is intended to

 facilitate the current procedures by providing for orders for costs in accordance with Division 2

 of Part 3 of Schedule 1  to be made in chambers without hearing the parties.

 

[29]  Dictionary (definition of child support proceeding)

[30]  Dictionary (definition of Registrar of the Tribunal)

[31]  Dictionary (definition of SSAT)

 

Items [29-31] amend the dictionary to redefine child support proceeding, include a new

definition of Registrar of the Tribunal, and repeal the definition of the SSAT as a consequence of

the merger of the Tribunals.

Overview

The Federal Circuit Court Amendment (Costs and Other Measures) Rules 2016 were enacted to address a variety of issues arising from procedural and structural changes in the legal landscape, particularly in relation to costs, family law, child support, and the amalgamation of tribunals under the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). These rules, made under the authority of section 81 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999, aim to update the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 to reflect changes in legislation and procedural recommendations. The amendments include increasing itemised costs in line with recommendations from the Joint Costs Advisory Committee, extending the list of persons who can search court records in family law and child support proceedings to include child welfare officers, and making several procedural changes to accommodate the Tribunals Amalgamation Act 2015, which established the Social Services and Child Support Division of the AAT. The policy objective behind these amendments is to ensure that the court’s procedures remain current, efficient, and aligned with the evolving legal framework.

Scope and Application

The Federal Circuit Court Amendment (Costs and Other Measures) Rules 2016 apply to the practice and procedure of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, as governed by section 81 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999. These rules affect a broad range of persons and entities, particularly those involved in family law, child support, and migration proceedings, by specifying the costs, procedural requirements, and other measures associated with these matters. The amendments are designed to reflect changes in the legislative and administrative framework, particularly the amalgamation of tribunals under the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The rules also clarify and update various procedural aspects, such as the calculation of costs and the roles of different officers in the court system. These amendments apply across the Commonwealth and are made pursuant to the authority granted under the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999, with the Legislation Act 2003 applying to these rules as if they were legislative instruments. There are no specific exclusions or thresholds outlined in these rules, but they do extend their application through subordinate instruments as necessary to adapt to legislative changes.

Key Provisions

The Federal Circuit Court Amendment (Costs and Other Measures) Rules 2016 primarily amend the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (the "Rules") in several key areas. Part 1 of the amendment repeals and replaces Schedule 1 of the Rules with a new schedule that increases the itemised costs in line with recommendations from the Joint Costs Advisory Committee. These increases apply to work or services performed after the commencement of the new schedule (Rule 1). Part 2 contains miscellaneous amendments to various rules, including extending the list of persons who can access court records in family law/child support proceedings to child welfare officers if the case affects the welfare of a child (Rule 2). Other amendments include consolidating response rules (Rule 3), updating references in certain rules to align with the Family Law Act (Rules 4-7), and amending rules relating to child support and maintenance proceedings to reflect changes from the Tribunals Amalgamation Act 2015 (Rules 9-23). The amendments also update references to the Social Security Appeals Tribunal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Rules 24-28, 30). Lastly, Rule 44.15 is repealed and replaced to clarify costs processes in migration proceedings (Rule 28). The amendments impose certain obligations on parties and entities governed by the Rules. For example, the new costs schedule in Part 1 sets out increased costs for various court activities. The amendments in Part 2 update references and clarify certain procedural requirements in various rules. The changes aim to ensure the Rules are consistent with other relevant legislation and court practices. Breach of the Rules may have various consequences depending on the specific rule. However, the Explanatory Statement does not outline any specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach of the amended Rules. The Rules themselves would need to be consulted to determine any potential sanctions for non-compliance with the amended provisions. In summary, the key changes increase certain costs, extend access to court records to child welfare officers, update references in various rules, and clarify costs processes in migration proceedings. The amendments aim to ensure the Rules remain consistent and up-to-date with other relevant legislation and court practices. However, the Explanatory Statement does not outline any specific penalties for breach of the amended Rules.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Family Law
Instrument
Rules
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.