PROCLAMATION
Commonwealth of By His Excellency the
Australia Governor-General of the
JOHN R. KERR Commonwealth of Australia
Governor-General
IN pursuance of sub-section (3) of section 96 of the
Family Law Act 1975, I, SIR JOHN ROBERT KERR,
the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of
Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal
Executive Council, hereby fix 1 June 1976 as the date
on or after which appeals to the Supreme Courts of
the States of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland,
South Australia and Tasmania and of the Australian
Capital Territory and Norfolk Island under that
section may not be instituted.
GIVEN under my Hand and the Great Seal
(L.S.) of Australia on 27 May 1976.
By His Excellency’s Command
R. ELLICOTT
Attorney-General
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!
Overview
The Family Law Act 1975 was enacted to provide a comprehensive framework for family law matters in Australia, addressing issues such as marriage, separation, and the legal rights and responsibilities of parents and children. This Act aimed to create a unified approach to family law, replacing previous state-based systems that often resulted in inconsistent outcomes. The legislation was introduced to address the fragmentation and complexity of family law across different jurisdictions and to ensure a more equitable and accessible system for all Australians. Enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, the Act sought to establish a national framework that would provide a more consistent and efficient resolution of family law disputes. The policy objective was to streamline family law processes and to provide a more cohesive legal system that reflects contemporary family dynamics and societal values.
Scope and Application
The proclamation pertains to the Family Law Act 1975 and applies to the conduct and transactions involving family law matters in Australia. Specifically, it addresses the limitation on the ability to institute appeals to the Supreme Courts of various states and territories. The proclamation was made by the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting on advice from the Federal Executive Council, and fixes 1 June 1976 as the date from which such appeals are no longer permissible. This applies to the states of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, and Tasmania, as well as the Australian Capital Territory and Norfolk Island. The proclamation aims to streamline and formalise the appeal process within the family law framework by restricting the avenues for appeal to higher courts in specified jurisdictions.
Key Provisions
The Proclamation (F2005B01723) sets a specific date, 1 June 1976, from which appeals to the Supreme Courts of certain states and territories under section 96 of the Family Law Act 1975 are no longer permissible. This means that any appeals filed after this date will not be entertained by these courts (section 1). The states and territories covered by this proclamation include New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, and Tasmania, as well as the Australian Capital Territory and Norfolk Island (section 1). This legislative instrument aims to streamline the appeal process by limiting the jurisdictions to which appeals can be made, thereby reducing potential delays and complexities in family law matters.
Under the provisions of this legislation, the obligations imposed on the parties or entities governed by it are straightforward. Legal practitioners, litigants, and all other relevant parties must be aware of the date specified in the proclamation and ensure that any appeals intended to be brought under section 96 of the Family Law Act 1975 are instituted before 1 June 1976. Failure to comply with this requirement will result in the appeal being ineligible for consideration by the specified Supreme Courts (section 1). Additionally, the Act ensures that there is a clear and unambiguous cut-off date for instituting such appeals, thereby providing certainty and predictability within the legal framework.
In terms of breaches and consequences, the Act does not explicitly state penalties or specific legal consequences for non-compliance within the legislative text itself. However, any appeal filed after the specified date would be considered non-compliant and would not be entertained by the courts named in the proclamation. This non-compliance could potentially lead to the dismissal of the appeal, with the legal consequences being that the decision of the lower court remains binding and enforceable (section 1). Although the Act does not detail specific civil or criminal penalties, the failure to adhere to the stipulated conditions could result in the loss of the right to appeal, which could be a significant disadvantage in the legal resolution of family law disputes.