EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Family Law Act 1975
Family Court of Australia
(Delegation of Powers) Rules
Statutory Rules No. 342 of 1985
The Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2) (No. 193 of 1985) (“the Act”) came into operation on 16 December 1985.
The Act repeals section 37A of the Family Law Act 1975 and substitutes a new section 37A. The Act also amends section 37B.
New Section 37A of the Family Law Act enables the Judges of the Family Court of Australia to make Rules of Court delegating certain powers of the Family Court of Australia to Registrars of the Family Court of Australia.
The Family Court of Australia (Delegation of Powers) Rules (Statutory Rules No. 342 of 1985), made by a majority of Judges of the Family Court of Australia under new section 37A of the Family Law Act, delegate to Registrars of the Family Court of Australia the powers specified in those Rules.
The powers delegated to Registrars under Statutory Rules No. 342 of 1985 are the same powers as were able to be exercised by Registrars under the repealed section 37A of the Family Law Act read with former Order 36 Rule 3 of the Family Law Rules (Statutory Rules No. 425 of 1984), except that the power to make orders for the enforcement of maintenance orders has not been delegated.
Overview
The Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2) 1985 was enacted to amend the Family Law Act 1975 by repealing and substituting a new section 37A, as well as amending section 37B. This legislative update was introduced to address the need for a more streamlined and efficient delegation of powers within the Family Court of Australia. The Family Court of Australia (Delegation of Powers) Rules, Statutory Rules No. 342 of 1985, were made by a majority of Judges of the Family Court of Australia under the new section 37A of the Family Law Act. These rules delegate to Registrars of the Family Court of Australia certain powers specified within the rules, enabling a more effective distribution of judicial responsibilities and enhancing the operational efficiency of the court system. The overall policy objective of these amendments is to ensure that the Family Court of Australia can operate more efficiently by appropriately delegating certain powers to Registrars, while maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of the court's functions.
Scope and Application
The Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2) (No. 193 of 1985) amends the Family Law Act 1975 by replacing section 37A with a new provision that allows the Judges of the Family Court of Australia to delegate certain powers to Registrars of the Family Court of Australia through the creation of Rules of Court. This delegation is further specified in the Family Court of Australia (Delegation of Powers) Rules, which were made by a majority of Judges of the Family Court of Australia and came into effect under the new section 37A. These rules delegate to Registrars the same powers that were previously exercisable under the repealed section 37A of the Family Law Act, in conjunction with former Order 36 Rule 3 of the Family Law Rules, with the notable exception of the power to make orders for the enforcement of maintenance orders, which remains with the Judges of the Family Court of Australia. The Act applies to Judges and Registrars within the Family Court of Australia, impacting the conduct and administration of family law matters within its jurisdiction.
Key Provisions
The Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2) 1985 introduces significant changes to the Family Law Act 1975, specifically through the introduction of new Section 37A and the amendment of Section 37B. According to the new Section 37A (1), Judges of the Family Court of Australia are empowered to create Rules of Court that delegate certain of their powers to Registrars of the Family Court of Australia. This delegation is aimed at streamlining the court's operations and ensuring that routine administrative tasks are handled by appropriately qualified individuals. The Family Court of Australia (Delegation of Powers) Rules (Statutory Rules No. 342 of 1985) detail the specific powers that can be delegated to Registrars under this new legislative framework. These Rules ensure that the powers delegated to Registrars are consistent with those previously exercised under the repealed section 37A of the Family Law Act, read with former Order 36 Rule 3 of the Family Law Rules (Statutory Rules No. 425 of 1984), with the notable exclusion of the power to make orders for the enforcement of maintenance orders.
The Act imposes clear obligations on the Judges of the Family Court of Australia to ensure that any delegation of powers to Registrars is carried out in accordance with the new legislative provisions. The Judges must establish the Rules of Court that define the scope and limits of the powers delegated to Registrars. Additionally, Registrars must exercise their delegated powers within the confines of these Rules, ensuring that their actions are both lawful and consistent with the overarching objectives of the Family Law Act. The Act also places a responsibility on Registrars to maintain accurate records of their delegated activities, thereby providing transparency and accountability within the Family Court’s operations.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2) 1985, or the subsequent Rules of Court, may result in significant consequences. Breach of these provisions could lead to the nullification of any orders made by Registrars, potentially requiring rehearing of cases and causing delays and additional costs for the parties involved. Furthermore, while the Act does not explicitly outline criminal penalties for non-compliance, the seriousness of the breaches could result in judicial review or other legal actions against the erring parties. The consequences of such actions may include financial penalties, orders for restitution, or even professional disciplinary measures for Judges and Registrars found to be in breach of their obligations. The precise nature and extent of these consequences would depend on the specific circumstances of the breach and the discretion of the Court.