Extradition (Transnational Organised Crime) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1)

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2009L03622 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Select Legislative Instrument 2009 No. 267

Issued by the authority of the Minister for Home Affairs

Extradition Act 1988
 

Extradition (Transnational Organised Crime) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1)

 

Section 55 of the Extradition Act 1988 (the Act) provides, in part, that the GovernorGeneral may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing all matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act. 

The Act makes provision for the extradition of persons from Australia to extradition countries and to New Zealand, and facilitates the making of requests for extradition by Australia to other countries.  Extradition from Australia can only take place to an extradition country, or to New Zealand, under the special procedures set down in the Act.  Section 5 of the Act provides that an ‘extradition country’ is any country (other than New Zealand) that is declared by the regulations to be an extradition country. 

Subsection 11(1A) of the Act provides that the regulations may provide that the Act applies in relation to a specified extradition country subject to the limitations, conditions, exceptions or qualifications as are necessary to give effect to a multilateral extradition treaty in relation to the country.  Subsection 11(1C) provides that this may be achieved by applying the Act to the country subject to the treaty.

Australia is party to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime 2000 (the Convention) and its supplementary Protocols; the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air and the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (the Protocols).  The Extradition (Transnational Organised Crime) Regulations 2004 (the Principal Regulations) declared countries listed in Schedule 2 of the Principal Regulations to be ‘extradition countries’ for the purposes of the Act.  The countries listed in Schedule 2 were those countries that were a party to the Convention or the Protocols at the time the Principal Regulations were last updated in 2005.  The Schedule did not include a number of countries that had become a party to the Convention or the Protocols since 2005.   

The Extradition (Transnational Organised Crime) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1)
(the Regulations) repeal the list of countries in Schedule 2 of the Principal Regulations, and declare that a country, or a colony, territory or protectorate of a country, for which the Convention or the Protocols are in force is an extradition country for the purposes of
section 5 of the Act and that the Act applies subject to the Convention for those countries that are a party to the Convention.  Similarly, the Regulations provide that the Act applies subject to the Protocols for those countries that are a party to the Protocols.  By providing that any country that is a party to the Convention or the Protocols at any given time will be an ‘extradition country’ for the purposes of the Act, these amendments will ensure Australia is able to meet its international obligations under the Convention and the Protocols. 

The Regulations simplify the administrative arrangements so that the regulations do not have to be amended each time a new country becomes a party to the Convention or the Protocols.  The Regulations include a note referring the reader to the United Nations website which contains a current list of countries for which the Convention and the Protocols is in force.

The approach of referring in regulations to foreign countries that are party to a Convention without listing those countries has been adopted in other regulations.  Subsection 13(3) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 allows things to be declared in regulations by referring to a class of things.

Extradition under the Regulations operates in accordance with the Act, subject to the applicable Convention or Protocols.  The Act applies the modern ‘no evidence’ standard for documentation provided in support of any extradition request.  In accordance with this evidentiary standard, countries are not required to provide evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case that the person committed the offence.

Extradition requests made pursuant to the Regulations are subject to the various safeguards set out in the Act.  For example, extradition will not be permitted where the person is sought for or in connection with his or her race, religion, nationality or political opinions or is to be tried, sentenced or detained for a political or military offence.  Extradition must be refused where the offence for which the person is requested attracts the death penalty, unless an undertaking is given that the death penalty will not be imposed or, if imposed, will not be carried out.  Extradition must also be refused where the person could be subjected to torture.   In addition, the Attorney-General retains a broad discretion to refuse an extradition request by a country.

Consultation was unnecessary for this legislative instrument as this instrument does not substantially alter existing arrangements and has no direct or indirect effect on business.

The Regulations are a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

The Regulations commenced on the day after they were registered with the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 

 

Overview

The Extradition (Transnational Organised Crime) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1) were introduced to address the problem of updating the list of countries to which Australia can extradite individuals in cases of transnational organised crime, ensuring alignment with the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime 2000 and its supplementary Protocols. These regulations amend the Extradition (Transnational Organised Crime) Regulations 2004, which previously listed specific countries as extradition countries based on their adherence to the Convention or Protocols at a particular point in time. By repealing the list in Schedule 2 of the Principal Regulations and instead declaring that any country party to the Convention or Protocols is an extradition country, the amendment simplifies administrative processes and ensures Australia meets its international obligations. The policy objective is to streamline extradition processes and maintain compliance with international treaties by adopting a dynamic approach to the identification of extradition countries. The Regulations were issued under the authority of the Minister for Home Affairs and are consistent with the provisions of the Extradition Act 1988.

Scope and Application

The Extradition (Transnational Organised Crime) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1) amend the Extradition (Transnational Organised Crime) Regulations 2004 to update the list of countries recognised as extradition countries under the Extradition Act 1988. Instead of listing specific countries in the regulations, the amendments adopt a more flexible approach where any country that is a party to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime 2000 or its supplementary Protocols is deemed an extradition country. This change streamlines the regulatory process by avoiding the need to update the regulations each time a new country becomes a party to the Convention or Protocols. The amendments ensure that Australia can meet its international obligations under the Convention and Protocols. Extradition under these Regulations operates in accordance with the Extradition Act, subject to the applicable Convention or Protocols, and includes safeguards such as the "no evidence" standard for extradition requests and prohibitions on extraditing a person where they may face the death penalty, torture, or be tried for political or military offences. The Regulations came into effect the day after they were registered with the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

Key Provisions

The Extradition (Transnational Organised Crime) Amendment Regulations 2009 (No. 1) amend the Extradition (Transnational Organised Crime) Regulations 2004, primarily by removing the schedule listing specific extradition countries and replacing it with a provision that any country that is a party to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime 2000 or its supplementary Protocols is deemed an "extradition country" under section 5 of the Extradition Act 1988 (the Act) (reg 3). This approach ensures that the regulations do not require amendments each time a new country joins the Convention or Protocols, streamlining the administrative process. The Act applies to these countries subject to the terms of the Convention or Protocols (reg 3). The Regulations specify that the Act applies to any country or its territories where the Convention or Protocols are in force, ensuring Australia can meet its international obligations (reg 3). These Regulations impose obligations on the Australian government to facilitate extradition in accordance with the Extradition Act and the applicable Convention or Protocols. This includes ensuring that extradition requests adhere to the "no evidence" standard for documentation, meaning that evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case is not required (s 13 of the Act). The Regulations also mandate that extradition is not permitted if the individual could face persecution based on race, religion, nationality, or political opinion, or if they could be subjected to torture or face the death penalty unless certain conditions are met (ss 14, 15, and 16 of the Act). Additionally, the Attorney-General retains discretion to refuse an extradition request, ensuring that Australia can balance its obligations with considerations of justice and human rights (s 17 of the Act). Breaching the requirements of the Extradition Act or the Regulations can lead to significant legal consequences. Under the Extradition Act, any person who fails to comply with a lawful extradition request, or who provides false information in the process, can face criminal penalties. The maximum penalty for providing false information is imprisonment for five years, while the penalty for failing to comply with an extradition order is imprisonment for two years (ss 46 and 47 of the Act). These penalties underscore the seriousness with which Australia treats its extradition obligations and the importance of adhering to the legal framework governing these processes. Furthermore, any administrative errors or failures to comply with the Act's safeguards can result in the extradition request being refused, impacting Australia's international relations and legal standing.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
International Law
Criminal Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Extradition

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.