STATUTORY RULES.
—––––––––––
1956. No. .
REGULATION UNDER THE CUSTOMS ACT 1901-1954 AND THE COMMERCE (TRADE DESCRIPTION’S) ACT 1905-1950.*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Customs Act 1901-1954 and the Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905-1950.
Dated this twenty-first day of February, 1956.
W. J. Slim
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
Minister of State for Primary Industry and for and on behalf of the Minister of State for Customs and Excise.
––––––
Amendment of the Exports (Fish) Regulations.†
Inspection fees.
Regulation 36 of the Exports (Fish) Regulations is amended by omitting from sub-regulation (1.) the words “ Thirteen shillings ” and inserting in their stead the words “ Fourteen shillings and sixpence ”.
* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on , 1956.
† Statutory Rules 1949, No. 54, as amended by Statutory Rules 1950, No. 38; 1951, Nos. 48 and 127; 1952, No. 105; 1954, No. 43; and 1955, No. 51.
–––––––––––––––––
By Authority: A. J. Arthur, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.
6219/55.—Price 3d. 9/17.1.1956.
Overview
The Statutory Rules of 1956, specifically No. 8, represent a legislative instrument made under the authority of the Customs Act 1901-1954 and the Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905-1950. Enacted by the Governor-General in Council, this regulation was introduced to address administrative needs within the context of fish exports, particularly in relation to inspection fees. The primary objective was to adjust the fees payable for fish inspections to reflect contemporary economic conditions. The regulation is a minor amendment to the Exports (Fish) Regulations, increasing the inspection fee from thirteen shillings to fourteen shillings and sixpence, thus ensuring that the regulatory framework remains financially viable and effective in its oversight of fish exports.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rules 1956 No. 8, made under the Customs Act 1901-1954 and the Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905-1950, specifically amends the Exports (Fish) Regulations to alter the inspection fees for fish exports. This legislative instrument applies to individuals and entities involved in the export of fish, ensuring that they comply with the updated fee structure set out in the regulation. The geographic reach of this Act is national, applying across all states and territories within the Commonwealth of Australia. It is important to note that the regulation does not provide explicit exclusions or exemptions, but rather sets a specific monetary threshold for inspection fees, thus impacting all entities engaged in fish exports. The regulation extends its application through the subordinate instruments, which are the Exports (Fish) Regulations as amended over the years, ensuring that the changes made by this statutory rule are integrated into the existing regulatory framework.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation pertain to the amendment of the Exports (Fish) Regulations under the Customs Act 1901-1954 and the Commerce (Trade Descriptions) Act 1905-1950. Specifically, Regulation 36 of the Exports (Fish) Regulations is modified (s. 1(1)) by changing the inspection fee for fish exports from Thirteen shillings to Fourteen shillings and sixpence (s. 1(2)). This alteration affects the financial obligations of entities involved in the export of fish from Australia.
The obligations imposed by this Act primarily revolve around ensuring that exporters comply with the updated inspection fees. Exporters of fish must now remit Fourteen shillings and sixpence per inspection, as specified in the amended Regulation 36 (s. 1(2)). This requirement applies to all entities engaged in the export of fish, necessitating adherence to the new fee structure as stipulated in the legislation.
In terms of potential breaches and consequences, while the legislation does not explicitly outline penalties for non-compliance with the updated inspection fee, it is implicit that failure to adhere to the revised fee structure could lead to complications in the export process. Exporters who do not pay the correct amount may face delays or issues with customs clearance, which could result in financial and logistical repercussions. Given the legislative context, it is reasonable to infer that non-compliance with such regulations could attract penalties under the overarching Acts, which typically include fines or other administrative actions to enforce compliance.