STATUTORY RULES.
1920. No. 121.
REGULATION UNDER THE EXCISE ACT 1901-1918.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Excise Act 1901-1918, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this fourteenth day of July, 1920.
R.M. FERGUSON,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
W. MASSY GREENE,
Minister of State for Trade and Customs.
————
Amendment of Excise Regulations 1913.
(Statutory Rules 1913, No. 345.)
After regulation 180A of the Excise Regulations, the following regulation is inserted:—
Samples.
“180a. (1) A sample taken or obtained by an officer under the provisions of section 106 or section 107 of the Excise Act 190l-1918 shall be dealt with in the following manner:—
(a) the officer taking or obtaining the sample shall, in the presence of the person or the agent or servant of the person, from whom the sample is taken or obtained, divide the sample into three equal parts and label or mark and securely seal each part; and
(b) the officer shall hand one part to the owner or his agent or servant, deliver for report another part to an analyst approved by the Collector, and retain the third part for further examination, if necessary.
“(2) Delivery of the part to the analyst may be effected personally or by sending the part by registered post addressed to the analyst at his usual address, or in such other manner as the Collector approves.
“(3) In the event of any dispute as to the identity of the part received by the analyst the burden of proof shall lie upon the person complaining.
“(4) The production of a certificate of analysis of the part purporting to be signed by the analyst shall be sufficient evidence of the identity of the part and of the result of the analysis, without proof of the signature of the person purporting to have signed the certificate.”
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
Overview
The Excise Regulations 1920 were enacted under the Excise Act 1901-1918 to introduce procedures for handling samples taken by excise officers for the purposes of analysis and compliance with excise laws. These regulations were made by the Governor-General in Council, acting on the advice of the Minister of State for Trade and Customs. The primary objective of these regulations was to ensure that samples taken from individuals or entities were handled fairly and transparently, with clear protocols for division, labelling, and distribution to the owner, an analyst, and the excise authorities. This was aimed at maintaining the integrity of the excise process and providing a reliable means of verifying compliance with excise duties and taxes.
Scope and Application
The Excise Regulations 1913, as amended by Statutory Rules 1920, No. 121, pertain to the procedures for handling samples taken by officers under the Excise Act 1901-1918. This regulation applies to samples taken or obtained by an officer pursuant to sections 106 or 107 of the Excise Act, and it mandates a specific process to ensure the integrity and traceability of the samples. The regulation applies to any person, their agent or servant, whose goods are subject to sampling by excise officers. The regulation outlines a geographic and jurisdictional reach within the Commonwealth of Australia, governing the conduct of excise officers and the procedures they must follow when taking and handling samples. The regulation does not specify any exclusions or exemptions, nor does it mention any thresholds that would limit its application. The regulation extends its application by detailing the method of sample division, labelling, sealing, and distribution among the owner, an approved analyst, and the excise officer, thereby ensuring a systematic and transparent process.
Key Provisions
The Excise Regulations 1920, specifically introduced under the Excise Act 1901-1918, bring forward amendments to the existing Excise Regulations 1913. Notably, a new regulation, 180A, is introduced, detailing the procedure for handling samples taken by officers. According to regulation 180A(1), when an officer takes or obtains a sample under sections 106 or 107 of the Excise Act, they must divide the sample into three equal parts in the presence of the owner or their representative. Each part is to be labelled, marked, and securely sealed. One part is given to the owner or their representative, another is sent to an approved analyst for analysis, and the third part is retained by the officer for potential further examination. Regulation 180A(2) specifies that the delivery of the sample to the analyst can be done in person, by registered post, or by another approved method. Regulation 180A(3) states that if there is any dispute regarding the identity of the sample received by the analyst, the burden of proof falls on the person making the complaint. Regulation 180A(4) asserts that a certificate of analysis signed by the analyst is sufficient evidence of the sample’s identity and analysis result, without requiring further proof of the signature.
These provisions impose specific obligations on officers who take or obtain samples under the Excise Act. They must ensure that the sample is divided into three equal parts, each properly labelled and sealed, and that one part is given to the owner or their representative. They must also deliver another part to an approved analyst for analysis and retain the third part for their records. These actions are to be conducted in a manner that maintains the integrity and traceability of the samples. Furthermore, officers must follow the prescribed methods for delivering the sample to the analyst, ensuring that the process is transparent and verifiable.
Non-compliance with the regulations regarding the handling of samples could lead to various consequences. If an officer fails to properly divide, label, or seal the sample, or if they do not follow the prescribed methods for delivering the sample to the analyst, they may be subject to penalties. Although the specific penalties are not detailed in the provided text, it is clear that any breach of these provisions could result in legal repercussions, which might include fines or other administrative actions under the Excise Act. The precise penalties would be determined by the relevant authorities and would likely be consistent with the broader framework established by the Excise Act 1901-1918.