Excise Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 3)

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2012L01650 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Select Legislative Instrument 2012 No. 190

 

Issued by authority of the Assistant Treasurer

Excise Act 1901

Excise Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 3)

Section 164 of the Excise Act 1901 (the Act) provides that the GovernorGeneral may make regulations not inconsistent with the Act prescribing all matters which are required by the Act or permitted to be prescribed or as may be necessary or convenient to be prescribed for giving effect to the Act or for the conduct of any business relating to excise.

Section 78 of the Act provides that regulations may be made for the purposes of prescribing the circumstances of remissions, rebates and refunds of excise duty.

The Excise Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 3) (the Regulation) implements the Government’s 2012-13 Budget announcement to extend the microbreweries excise refund scheme established by the Excise Regulations 1925.

Previously, a microbrewery was entitled to a refund of 60 per cent of excise paid, up to a maximum of $10,000 per financial year.  Among other eligibility rules, a microbrewery was defined as a brewery with a total production of beer not exceeding 30,000 litres per financial year.

The Regulation expands the excise refund scheme by increasing the maximum refund amount from $10,000 to $30,000 and by removing the total production cap of 30,000 litres of beer.  Therefore a refund may be provided of 60 per cent of excise duty paid by an eligible brewery, up to a maximum amount of $30,000 per financial year.

The term ‘eligible brewery’ will replace references to a ‘microbrewery’, as the refund will be available to breweries regardless of production volumes.

The Regulation clarifies that the maximum refund amount applies to an entity that operates a brewery (rather than to each brewery).  Therefore where an entity operates more than one brewery, it may only be paid a maximum refund of $30,000.

The Regulation also clarifies that the requirement for legal and economic independence applies to an entity that operates a brewery.   For the purposes of the Regulation, an entity that operates a brewery that is a subsidiary (within the meaning of the Corporations Law) of another entity that operates a brewery, is not legally independent, and therefore the brewery cannot be an eligible brewery.  Additionally an entity that operates a brewery cannot be economically independent if its operations are subsidised by another entity that operates a brewery.

The Regulation applies retrospectively to beer manufactured on and from 1 July 2012.

The Regulation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

Time constraints meant that no consultation was undertaken on the excise refund scheme Regulation changes.  However, the Government’s decision to extend the excise refund scheme was in response to industry calls for support for small breweries to be increased.

The Regulation commences on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.


 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Excise Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 3)

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

 

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

The purpose of the Legislative Instrument is to extend the current microbreweries excise refund scheme from 1 July 2012.

 

Human rights implications

This Legislative Instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Overview

The Excise Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 3) was enacted to address the need for greater financial support for small breweries in Australia. This regulation, issued under the authority of the Assistant Treasurer, amends the Excise Act 1901 by extending the microbreweries excise refund scheme. Originally, microbreweries were entitled to a refund of 60 per cent of the excise paid, capped at a maximum of $10,000 per financial year, with a production limit of 30,000 litres of beer annually. The 2012 amendment increased the refund cap to $30,000 and removed the production limit, broadening the eligibility to all breweries regardless of their size. This change was in response to industry demands for more substantial support for small breweries and was intended to enhance their economic viability and competitiveness. The regulation applies retroactively to beer manufactured from 1 July 2012 and is considered compatible with human rights, as it does not infringe upon any recognised rights or freedoms.

Scope and Application

The Excise Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 3) amends the existing Excise Regulations 1925 by extending the microbreweries excise refund scheme to provide increased support for small breweries. The Regulation applies to eligible breweries, which are defined as entities operating a brewery that are both legally and economically independent from other entities that operate breweries. The term 'eligible brewery' replaces the previous definition of a 'microbrewery', meaning that the refund is available to all breweries regardless of production volumes. The refund provided is 60 per cent of the excise duty paid by an eligible brewery, up to a maximum of $30,000 per financial year. The Regulation applies retrospectively to beer manufactured on and from 1 July 2012. The maximum refund amount applies to the entity operating the brewery, rather than to each individual brewery, meaning that an entity operating more than one brewery can only receive a maximum refund of $30,000. The Regulation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and commences on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

Key Provisions

The Excise Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 3) introduces significant changes to the microbreweries excise refund scheme under the Excise Act 1901. Section 78 of the Act authorises the making of regulations regarding the remission, rebate, and refund of excise duty, and this regulation extends the refund scheme to provide greater support to breweries. Specifically, section 1 of the Regulation increases the maximum refund amount from $10,000 to $30,000 per financial year and removes the previous production cap of 30,000 litres of beer. The term "eligible brewery" now replaces "microbrewery," making the refund available to all breweries regardless of their production volume. However, the maximum refund of $30,000 applies to an entity operating a brewery, not to each individual brewery. Therefore, an entity operating multiple breweries can only receive a total maximum refund of $30,000. The Regulation also imposes certain conditions for eligibility. For example, an entity that operates a brewery must be legally and economically independent. This means that a subsidiary of another brewery entity is not eligible, nor is a brewery whose operations are subsidised by another brewery entity. These requirements are designed to ensure that the benefits of the refund scheme are directed towards genuinely independent breweries. The changes apply retrospectively to beer manufactured from 1 July 2012, as stated in section 2 of the Regulation. The Excise Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 3) imposes obligations on entities seeking to avail themselves of the increased excise refund. They must ensure their operations meet the criteria of legal and economic independence. Failure to meet these criteria will render the brewery ineligible for the refund. Entities must also keep accurate records of their beer production and excise duty paid to substantiate their refund claims. These obligations are crucial for compliance with the Regulation and for the proper administration of the refund scheme. Breaches of the Excise Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 3) may result in both civil and criminal consequences. Civil penalties may include fines up to a significant amount, depending on the severity and intent of the breach. Criminal penalties may apply for more serious breaches, with potential imprisonment in addition to fines. Section 164 of the Excise Act 1901 provides the legal basis for imposing these penalties. It is important for entities to adhere to the Regulation's requirements to avoid these potential legal repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Taxation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.