EPBC Act Part 7-9 decisions published, 21/06/2021 to 27/06/2021
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WATER AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
For further information see the referrals list at http://epbcnotices.environment.gov.au/referralslist/
and type the reference number in the Filter by Referral Number box
actions determined as requiring approval (EPBC Act s.75)
Reference | Title | Controlling Provisions | Date |
2021/8937 | Gunyar Pty Limited / Commercial Development / , CSIRO Forestry Precinct, Banks Street, Yarralumla / Australian Capital Territory / Forestry Place Redevelopment of CSIRO Yarralumla, Block 7 Section 4 Yarralumla, ACT | - Listed threatened species and communities (sections 18 & 18A)
- Commonwealth land (26 & 27A)
| 17/06/2021 |
2021/8877 | Winchelsea Mining Pty Ltd / Mining / , Winchelsea Island, Anindilyakwa / Northern Territory / Winchelsea Island Manganese Mine Project, NT | - Listed threatened species and communities (sections 18 & 18A)
- Listed migratory species (sections 20 & 20A)
| 23/06/2021 |
actions determined as NOT requiring approval (EPBC Act s.75)
Reference | Title | Date |
2021/8944 | City of Albany / Commercial Development / Down Road, Drome, City of Albany / Western Australia / Albany Motorsport Park, 20kms Northwest Albany, WA | 23/06/2021 |
2021/8950* | National Capital Authority / Commonwealth / Parkes Pl W, Canberra / Australian Capital Territory / Replacement of poplars at the National Library of Australia Forecourt, ACT | 24/06/2021 |
* Actions which are not controlled actions provided they are undertaken in a particular manner. Further information on provision and manner specified is available from http://epbcnotices.environment.gov.au/referralslist/
Assessment Approach (EPBC Act s.87)
Reference | Title | Assessment Approach | Date |
2021/8937 | Gunyar Pty Limited / Commercial Development / , CSIRO Forestry Precinct, Banks Street, Yarralumla / Australian Capital Territory / Forestry Place Redevelopment of CSIRO Yarralumla, Block 7 Section 4 Yarralumla, ACT | Preliminary Documentation | 17/06/2021 |
variation of conditions of approval (EPBC Act s.143)
Reference | Title | Date |
2007/3423 | NEW ACLAND COAL PTY LTD / Mining / Darling Downs / Queensland / Stage 3 expansion of New Acland Coal Mine | 24/07/2020 |
2013/7098 | JONES THEATRE UNIT TRUST / Residential Development / Busselton / Western Australia / Residential development Lot 3, 500 Bussell Highway, WA | 21/06/2021 |
2016/7681 | Transport for NSW / Transport - Land / Kangy Angy / New South Wales / New Intercity Fleet Maintenance Facility Kangy Angy, NSW | 22/06/2021 |
2006/3201 | Southern Downs Regional Council / Water Management and Use / Stanthorpe / Queensland / Construction of a dam at Emu Swamp | 23/06/2021 |
2008/4208 | INPEX BROWSE LTD / Energy Generation and Supply (non-renewable) / Browse Basin WA to Darwin Harbour NT / Commonwealth Marine / Ichthys Gas Field, Offshore and onshore processing facilities and subsea pipeline | 23/06/2021 |
Some public notifications on the Internet and in the Gazette relating to the processing of referrals for approval under Chapter 4 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 may occasionally be missed in processing by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment or may not meet timeframes for notification. The Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment has implemented systems and ongoing quality assurance procedures to minimise any risk of missing a notification within the required timeframe. Where a missed notification is identified the practice will be to notify these even though the timeframe for notification has lapsed. This will ensure that the history of notifications for each referral is available to the public. The Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment regrets any inconvenience that may be caused by a missed notification. Please note that late notifications have not affected subsequent processing of referrals or assessments and they do not affect decisions made.
Overview
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for a cohesive national framework for the protection of the environment, particularly in relation to matters of national environmental significance. This legislation provides a comprehensive approach to environmental protection by identifying key environmental issues and establishing processes for the assessment and approval of actions that may impact upon these areas. The Act aims to ensure that environmental considerations are integrated into decision-making processes at both federal and state levels. By doing so, the Act seeks to protect and conserve Australia's biodiversity and heritage, while also facilitating sustainable development. The Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment is responsible for the administration of the Act, with a policy objective to balance environmental protection with economic growth and development.
Scope and Application
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) applies to a broad range of entities and activities within Australia, including both private and public sector organisations, with a focus on actions that may significantly impact the environment, including listed threatened species, communities, and migratory species, as well as Commonwealth land. This legislation applies on a national level, covering both terrestrial and marine environments across all states and territories. The scope of the Act includes various industries such as forestry, mining, commercial development, residential development, water management, and energy generation. The EPBC Act requires certain actions to be assessed for their potential environmental impacts and may necessitate approval from the relevant authorities. Some actions are deemed not to require approval if they are undertaken in a specific manner as outlined in the Act. The Act also allows for variations in the conditions of previously granted approvals, ensuring that environmental protections are maintained as circumstances evolve. Subordinate instruments and guidelines further extend and detail the application of the Act, providing a comprehensive framework for environmental management and biodiversity conservation in Australia.
Key Provisions
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) governs the approval process for various actions that may impact the environment, particularly focusing on threatened species and communities, migratory species, and Commonwealth land. Sections 75 and 87 of the Act are particularly relevant, as they detail the processes for determining whether an action requires approval and the approach for such assessments, respectively. For example, under section 75, the Act provides for the determination of whether an action requires approval (2021/8937) or does not require approval (2021/8944). The Act also allows for the variation of conditions of previously approved actions, as seen in the cases of New Acland Coal Pty Ltd (2007/3423) and Jones Theatre Unit Trust (2013/7098).
The obligations imposed by the EPBC Act on entities proposing actions that may impact the environment are significant. These entities must provide preliminary documentation and detailed assessments to ensure that the potential environmental impacts are thoroughly evaluated. For instance, Gunyar Pty Limited must assess the potential impact on listed threatened species and communities, as well as the use of Commonwealth land, for their forestry place redevelopment project (2021/8937). Similarly, Winchelsea Mining Pty Ltd must consider the impact on listed threatened species, communities, and migratory species for their manganese mine project (2021/8877). Failure to comply with these obligations can result in delays or additional scrutiny of the proposed action.
In terms of consequences for non-compliance or breaches of the EPBC Act, the legislation provides for both civil and criminal penalties. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the document, it is known that breaches of the Act can result in substantial fines and, in some cases, imprisonment. For instance, if a party fails to adhere to the conditions set out in an approval or assessment, they may face legal action. The seriousness of the penalty depends on the severity and intent of the breach, with potential consequences including fines of up to $1.1 million for individuals and $5.5 million for corporations, as well as imprisonment for up to five years. The Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment ensures that any missed notifications are addressed to maintain transparency and accountability in the approval process.