Dried Fruits Research and Development (Repeal and Consequential Provisions) Regulations 2001

Administered by Department of Agriculture

Legislation au F2001B00235 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Dried Fruits Research and Development (Repeal and Consequential Provisions) Regulations 2001 2001 No. 150

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

STATUTORY RULES 2001 No. 150

Issued by Authority of Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.

Primary Industries and Energy Research and Development Act 1989.

Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Act 2000.

Dried Fruits Research and Development (Repeal and Consequential Provisions) Regulations 2001.

Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Regulations 2001.

Subsection 149(1) of the Primary Industries and Energy Research and Development Act 1989 (the PIERD Act) and Section 34 of the Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Act 2000 (the Services Act) provide for the Governor-General to make regulations, not inconsistent with the PIERD Act and the Services Act to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Acts.

The purpose of the regulations is to:

       repeal the Dried Fruits Research and Development Regulations [Statutory Rules 1991 No.331] which, under Section 92 of the PIERD Act, provided for the establishment of the Dried Fruits Research and Development Council (DFRDC) and the Dried Fruits Research and Development Fund (the Fund). The DFRDC and the Fund currently operate under the auspices of the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC); and

       provide for transitional arrangements and retention of the provision that referred to the method of determining the gross value of production for the dried fruit sector of the horticultural industry as a new regulation under the Services Act.

Following recent developments in the dried fruits industry, such as the reduced production levels and the abolishment of the Australian Dried Fruits Board and its integration into Horticulture Australia Limited (HAL) (as a result of the repeal of the Australian Horticultural Corporation Act 1987, and the Horticultural Research and Development Corporation Act 1987), the DFRDC wrote to Senator the Hon Judith Troeth, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, seeking to change its status from a council under the RIRDC to an industry advisory committee under HAL.

The regulations will facilitate the disbursement of the R&D levy amounts to HAL. HAL is the industry services body set up under the Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Act 2000. It operates as a not-for-personal profit company, limited by guarantee under Corporations Law, to deliver marketing and research and development (R&D) services for the horticulture industry.

The DFRDC was established by separate regulations under the PIERD Act to conduct research and development activities on behalf of the dried fruits industry. The DFRDC operates autonomously and has its own board as well as separate reporting and accountability requirements under the PIERD Act.

Subsection 149(2) of the PIERD Act provides that before making a regulation for the purposes of section 92 of the PIERD Act the Governor-General is to take into consideration any relevant recommendation made to the Minister by the representative organisation for the primary industry. The Australian Dried Fruits Association Inc and the Australian Prune Industry Association Inc, as the recognised representative bodies for the dried fruits industry, wrote to the Parliamentary Secretary supporting the change in structure.

The arrangements offer a simplified structure under which the existing research and development program can be maintained along with existing levels of industry responsibility and involvement. It is expected that cost savings may be achieved under the arrangements by effectively maximising industry levy funds available for research and development activities. It is anticipated that this will have minimal effect on the level of Commonwealth funding to the industry, as existing ceilings for matching contributions have not been changed.

The Regulations provide transitional provisions to be applied to the imposition and collection of industry levies prior to 1 July 2001, and those amounts already paid to the DFRDC but not yet expended in accordance with the PIERD Act. These transitional arrangements require such industry levy amounts to be paid to, or forwarded to HAL after 1 July 2001.

There is also a consequential amendment requiring a final annual report for the year ending 30 June 2001 to be prepared and forwarded to the Minister by the DFRDC.

The Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Regulations 2001 provide for a method of determining the gross value of production of the dried fruit sector of the horticultural industry. Although, the opportunity has been taken to update the language, this is the same method that was provided for in the Dried Fruits Research and Development Regulations [Statutory Rules 1991 No. 331], which are repealed.

The regulations commence on 1 July 2001

Details of the Regulations are included in Attachments 1 and 2

ATTACHMENT 1

DRIED FRUITS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (REPEAL AND CONSEQUENTIAL PROVISIONS) REGULATIONS 2001.

Details of the Regulations are as follows:

Regulation 1 gives the name of the regulations as the Dried Fruits Research and Development (Repeal and Consequential Provisions) Regulations 2001.

Regulation 2 provides for a commencement date of 1 July 2001.

Regulation 3 provides for the Dried Fruits Research and Development Regulations [Statutory Rules 1991 No.331] to be repealed.

Regulation 4 provides transitional provisions to allow for matching Commonwealth payments, levy and penalty imposed, or collected, or paid prior to 1 July 2001 to be paid or forwarded to the industry services body.

Regulation 5 provides for the final annual report of the Dried Fruits Research and Development Council to be prepared and presented to the Minister.

ATTACHMENT 2

HORTICULTURE MARKETING AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REGULATIONS 2001

Details of the Regulations are as follows:

Part 1        Preliminary

Regulation 1.1 gives the name of the regulations as the Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Regulations 2001.

Regulation 1.2 provides for a commencement date of 1 July 2001.

Regulation 1.3 provides that Act means the Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Act 2000.

Part 2 has been reserved.

Part 3        Expenditure and funding of the industry services body

Regulation 3.1 provides for a method of calculation of the gross value of production of the dried fruit sector of the horticultural industry. This is in the standard format for this type of provision.

 

Overview

The Dried Fruits Research and Development (Repeal and Consequential Provisions) Regulations 2001, issued under the authority of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, were enacted to address structural changes in the dried fruits industry, particularly the integration of the Australian Dried Fruits Board into Horticulture Australia Limited (HAL). The regulations repealed the existing Dried Fruits Research and Development Regulations [Statutory Rules 1991 No. 331], which had established the Dried Fruits Research and Development Council (DFRDC) and the Dried Fruits Research and Development Fund under the Primary Industries and Energy Research and Development Act 1989. In their place, the regulations facilitated the transition of these functions to HAL, operating as a not-for-profit entity under the Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Act 2000. The policy objective of the regulations was to simplify the existing structure, potentially achieving cost savings by maximising industry levy funds for research and development activities, while maintaining existing levels of industry responsibility and involvement. The regulations also included transitional provisions for the payment of industry levies and penalties, as well as the preparation of a final annual report by the DFRDC. The Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Regulations 2001, also issued under the authority of the Parliamentary Secretary, provided for the method of calculating the gross value of production for the dried fruit sector of the horticultural industry, ensuring consistency with the repealed regulations. These regulations were designed to work in conjunction with the Dried Fruits Research and Development (Repeal and Consequential Provisions) Regulations 2001, ensuring a smooth transition of responsibilities and funding mechanisms to HAL, while retaining the existing method for determining the gross value of production. Both sets of regulations commenced on 1 July 2001.

Scope and Application

The Dried Fruits Research and Development (Repeal and Consequential Provisions) Regulations 2001 apply to the dried fruits industry, specifically focusing on the transition of the Dried Fruits Research and Development Council (DFRDC) from its previous operation under the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC) to its new role as an industry advisory committee under Horticulture Australia Limited (HAL). The Regulations also affect the Dried Fruits Research and Development Fund (the Fund), which is to be managed by HAL. These provisions are established under the authority of the Primary Industries and Energy Research and Development Act 1989 and the Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Act 2000. The Regulations are designed to facilitate the transfer of responsibilities, funding, and reporting mechanisms from the DFRDC under RIRDC to HAL, a not-for-profit company that delivers marketing and research and development services for the horticulture industry. The Regulations also ensure that the method of determining the gross value of production for the dried fruit sector remains consistent with previous regulations, now integrated into the Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Regulations 2001. Transitional provisions are included to manage the disbursement of existing levies and funds to HAL, ensuring a smooth transition for the industry.

Key Provisions

The Dried Fruits Research and Development (Repeal and Consequential Provisions) Regulations 2001 (Regulations) are a legislative instrument under the Primary Industries and Energy Research and Development Act 1989 (PIERD Act) and the Horticulture Marketing and Research and Development Services Act 2000 (Services Act). The Regulations repeal the existing Dried Fruits Research and Development Regulations [Statutory Rules 1991 No. 331] and introduce new provisions to manage the transition and continued operation of research and development activities within the dried fruits industry. Regulation 3 repeals the existing Dried Fruits Research and Development Regulations, while Regulation 4 provides for transitional arrangements to ensure that any levies, penalties, or payments made prior to 1 July 2001 are appropriately managed and forwarded to the new industry services body. Regulation 5 requires the final annual report of the Dried Fruits Research and Development Council for the year ending 30 June 2001 to be submitted to the Minister. The Regulations impose specific obligations on the parties involved, including the requirement for the Dried Fruits Research and Development Council to prepare and submit its final annual report to the Minister (Regulation 5). Furthermore, they mandate the forwarding of any levies, penalties, or payments collected or imposed before 1 July 2001 to the new industry services body, Horticulture Australia Limited (HAL) (Regulation 4). These provisions ensure a seamless transition and continuity of the research and development activities in the dried fruits industry. There are no specific offences, penalties, or consequences outlined within the Regulations themselves. However, any breaches of the underlying Acts (PIERD Act and Services Act) or other related legislation could result in penalties as prescribed by those Acts. For instance, under the PIERD Act, failure to comply with regulations could result in fines or other penalties as determined by the courts, while the Services Act may also provide for sanctions for non-compliance. It is important to refer to the respective Acts for detailed information on potential penalties and consequences.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Transitional Provisions
Repeal & Amendment
Licensing & Registration
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.