STATUTORY RULES.
1927. No. 2.
REGULATIONS UNDER THE DRIED FRUITS EXPORT CONTROL ACT 1924.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, so hereby make the following Regulations under the Dried Fruits Export Control Act 1924, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this 12th day of January, 1927.
(Sgd.) STONEHAVEN
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
Minister of State for Markets and Migration.
Amendment of Dried Fruits Export Control (Election of Board) Regulations.
(Statutory Rules 1924, No. 203, as amended to this date).
Regulations 22 and 23 of the Dried Fruits Export Control (Election of Board) Regulations are amended by omitting from the Forms of ballot-paper the words “by prepaid post or otherwise”.
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by H. J. Green, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
Overview
The Dried Fruits Export Control Act 1924 was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address the need for regulatory control over the export of dried fruits from Australia, ensuring the quality and consistency of exports. The Act was introduced to establish a framework for the export control of dried fruits, aiming to safeguard the reputation of Australian dried fruits in the international market. The policy objective of the Act was to provide a mechanism for the orderly export of dried fruits, ensuring that only fruits meeting certain standards were exported. The regulations under this Act, including the amendments made in 1927, were designed to refine the administrative and procedural aspects of the export control process, ensuring efficiency and compliance with the Act’s objectives.
Scope and Application
The Dried Fruits Export Control Act 1924 applies to the control of dried fruits exports within the Commonwealth of Australia. The legislative instrument amends the Dried Fruits Export Control (Election of Board) Regulations to modify the forms of ballot-paper used for the election of the Board. The regulations impact the process by which members of the Board are elected, thereby affecting the entities and individuals involved in the dried fruits export industry. The jurisdiction of the Act and its regulations is limited to the Commonwealth, meaning it does not extend to state or territory levels. The amendments specifically address procedural aspects of the election process, ensuring compliance with the overarching aim of the Act to regulate dried fruits exports effectively. No exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds are explicitly stated within this particular legislative instrument, although the overarching Act may contain such provisions that govern the scope and application of the regulatory framework. The Act allows for further extension or restriction of its application through additional subordinate instruments, which may include further regulations or amendments.
Key Provisions
The Dried Fruits Export Control Regulations (C1927L00002) amend the existing election procedures for the Board under the Dried Fruits Export Control Act 1924. Specifically, Regulations 22 and 23 are modified by removing the option for ballot papers to be submitted "by prepaid post or otherwise." This change implies that the only permissible method for submitting ballot papers is now explicitly defined, potentially excluding the previously allowed method of submission by prepaid post. This amendment might aim to streamline the process or to ensure that ballot papers are submitted in a manner that guarantees their timely receipt and processing.
The Act imposes obligations on the parties involved in the election process for the Board, ensuring that ballot papers are submitted in accordance with the regulations. This includes the requirement that ballot papers must be submitted in a specific manner, which, after the amendment, does not include prepaid post. Parties involved in the election process must adhere to these procedural requirements to ensure the validity and legality of the election. This includes ensuring that the submission process aligns with the updated regulations, thereby maintaining the integrity of the electoral process.
The consequences for non-compliance with these regulations are not explicitly detailed in the provided text. However, it is reasonable to infer that failure to comply with the specified submission methods could render the ballot papers invalid, potentially affecting the outcome of the election. While specific penalties are not mentioned, breaches of such regulations could lead to legal challenges or other administrative consequences. The lack of explicit penalties in this particular legislative instrument suggests that the focus is on procedural compliance rather than punitive measures.