Direction under section 32, Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 – Adjustments of Appropriations on Change of Agency Functions (No. 17 of 2005-2006)

Administered by Department of Finance

Legislation au F2006L01118 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

 

Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997, Section 32 - Adjustments of Appropriations on Change of Agency Functions

 

The instrument to which this explanatory statement relates

This explanatory statement relates to an instrument (the instrument) entitled “Direction under Section 32, Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997”, dated 6 April 2006 and numbered 17 of 2005-2006.

The legislative authority under which the instrument is made

Section 32 of the Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (the FMA Act) applies if a function of an Agency (the old Agency) becomes a function of another Agency (the new Agency), either because the old Agency is abolished or for any other reason.

Subsection 32(2)(a) of the FMA Act enables the Finance Minister to, amongst other things, issue one or more directions to transfer from the old Agency to the new Agency some or all of an amount that has been appropriated for the performance of that function by the old Agency.

As noted in the FMA Act, the Finance Minister has delegated his power under section 32 to the Chief Executive of the Department of Finance and Administration. By way of an instrument dated 30 November 2004, the Chief Executive of the Department of Finance and Administration has, in turn, delegated the power to the General Manager, Financial Management Group, and the Division Manager, Financial Reporting and Cash Management Division.

Purpose of the instrument

The instrument directs that Equity Injections from Appropriation Act (No. 2) 2005-06 totalling $4,130,000, provided to the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations, be transferred to Equity Injections in Appropriation Act (No.2) 2005-06 for the Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (ABCC). The instrument also directs that non-lapsing appropriation from prior years totalling $2,370,000 provided to the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations be transferred to non lapsing appropriation from prior years for the ABCC.

Background

As part of its response to the Cole Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, Cabinet agreed to establish the Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (JH/03/0145/CAB refers).  The ABCC’s functions include monitoring and promoting compliance with the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005, the Workplace Relations Act 1996 and the Building Code. 

 

An appropriation adjustment, pursuant to section 32 of the FMA Act, is required to ensure that appropriation provided to the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations for these functions is transferred to the Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner. 

The amount to be transferred has been agreed between the Chief Financial Officers of the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations and the Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner in line with established processes.

 

 

 

Notes on the instrument

The instrument provides that the moneys listed in column 4 of the schedule for the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations item be transferred to the Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner item listed in column 1.

 

Overview

The Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (FMA Act) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to establish a framework for financial management and accountability within Australian Government agencies. One of the significant issues the Act aimed to address is the need for flexibility in financial appropriations when there is a change in agency functions, whether due to the abolition of an agency or a reassignment of duties. The FMA Act provides mechanisms to adjust appropriations accordingly to ensure continuity and effectiveness in public administration. The instrument in question, "Direction under Section 32, Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997," dated 6 April 2006, pertains to the transfer of appropriations from the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations to the Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (ABCC). This transfer was necessitated by the establishment of the ABCC as part of the government's response to the Cole Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry. The policy objective here is to ensure that financial resources are appropriately allocated to support the ABCC's functions, which include monitoring and promoting compliance with various legislative frameworks. The instrument was issued under the delegated authority of the Chief Executive of the Department of Finance and Administration, reflecting the government's structured approach to financial management in response to organisational changes.

Scope and Application

The Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997, specifically Section 32, governs the adjustments of appropriations when there is a change in the functions of an agency. This applies to instances where a function previously performed by one agency (referred to as the old Agency) is transferred to another agency (the new Agency), whether due to the abolition of the old Agency or for other reasons. The Act authorises the Finance Minister to issue directions for the transfer of funds appropriated for the function from the old Agency to the new Agency. This provision ensures a seamless transition of financial resources as agencies undergo structural changes. The Finance Minister has delegated this power to the Chief Executive of the Department of Finance and Administration, who in turn has further delegated it to the General Manager, Financial Management Group, and the Division Manager, Financial Reporting and Cash Management Division. This legislative framework extends across the Commonwealth, ensuring uniform application of appropriation adjustments in line with agency restructuring. The instrument, dated 6 April 2006, directs the transfer of specific appropriations from the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations to the Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner, reflecting the reallocation of resources in response to the establishment of the ABCC as part of the government's initiative following the Cole Royal Commission.

Key Provisions

The Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (FMA Act) outlines provisions for the transfer of appropriations when the functions of an agency change. Specifically, section 32(2)(a) allows the Finance Minister to issue directions to transfer appropriations from an old agency to a new agency when a function is transferred due to abolition or other reasons. In this context, the instrument dated 6 April 2006 directs the transfer of $4,130,000 from the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations to the Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (ABCC), as well as $2,370,000 in non-lapsing appropriations from prior years. This transfer is in response to the establishment of the ABCC as part of the government's response to the Cole Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry. The obligations imposed by the Act require that the Finance Minister, through delegation, ensure that appropriations are correctly allocated to reflect the current functions of agencies. This includes the necessity for the Chief Financial Officers of the involved departments to agree on the transfer amounts in line with established processes. The instrument in question thus mandates that the specified funds be transferred to the ABCC to support its functions, including monitoring and promoting compliance with relevant acts. Failure to comply with the directions issued under section 32 of the FMA Act may result in legal consequences. While the specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed in the explanatory statement, breaches of legislative directions generally attract penalties that could include fines or other legal sanctions. The instrument itself is a formal directive that, if disregarded, could lead to enforcement actions by the relevant authorities, potentially resulting in criminal or civil liability depending on the nature and extent of the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Financial Management & Accountability
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Delegation of Authority
Transitional Provisions
Funding & Appropriations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.