Direction to the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority on the performance of its functions under section 226 of the National Health Reform Act 2011 - No 1/2020

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2020L00074 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

 

National Health Reform Act 2011

 

Direction to the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority on the performance of its functions under section 226 of the

National Health Reform Act 2011

No. 1/2020

 

Authority

 

This Instrument is made under subsection 226(1) of the National Health Reform Act 2011 (the Act), which provides that the Minister may give directions to the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA) in relation to the performance of its functions and exercise of its powers. Section 131 of the Act sets out the functions of the IHPA, and its powers are specified in section 135 of the Act. Paragraphs 131(1)(h), (i), and (n) set out the functions of the IHPA relevant to this Instrument.

 

This Instrument operates by directing the IHPA in relation to the performance of its functions and the exercise of its powers. Under subsection 226(4) of the Act, the IHPA must comply with a direction made under subsection 226(1).

 

Purpose

 

This Instrument directs the IHPA to conduct a costing and pricing study into the Nationally Funded Centres (NFC) Program to inquire into and make findings about the following matters:

(a)               the direct and indirect cost of providing each NFC service at each specified site for that NFC service;

(b)               the aggregate direct and indirect cost of providing each NFC service across all specified sites for that NFC service;

(c)               the projected cost of providing all NFC services at all specified sites; and

(d)               the existing direct and indirect cost of providing each NFC service for each patient in each specified site for that NFC service.

 

The instrument also directs the IHPA to provide the Commonwealth and the States and Territories with options in respect of the following matters:

 

a)                  whether NFC services, individually and collectively, are more appropriately funded via Activity Based Funding or block funding arrangements under the National Health Reform Agreement (NHRA);

b)                 the development and operation of cost models and pricing models for the NFC Program, covering both existing and potential future services delivered under the NFC Program; and

c)                  other related matters deemed appropriate by the Pricing Authority. 

 

 

This work will assist with improving effective service delivery to achieve better health outcomes and health system efficiencies for the public sector provision of certain high-cost, highly-specialised clinical practices and technologies with limited demand.

 

Background

 

The NFC Program was endorsed by Australian health ministers in June 1990 for the public sector provision of certain high cost, highly specialised clinical practices and technologies with limited demand. For a technology to be considered for NFC status it must require a national population base for efficient and effective service provision. 

 

The Commonwealth and States and Territories commissioned a review of the NFC Program (NFC Review). The NFC Review recommends the NFC Program be integrated into NHRA funding arrangements.

 

This instrument gives effect to State and Territory requests that the Commonwealth direct the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA) to conduct a study to fully understand the costing and pricing of NFC services.

 

As a preliminary scoping study, the IHPA’s NFC Program Costing Study will inform Commonwealth and State and Territory decisions in response to the NFC Review, such as revised costing and pricing processes to apply to existing and future NFCs.

 

Details

 

Subsection 226(3) of the Act provides that a direction made under subsection 226(1):

 

(a)  must be of a general nature only; and

(b) must not be a direction to change:

i.  a particular national efficient price for health care services provided by public hospitals; or

ii.  a particular efficient cost for health care services provided by public hospitals.

 

This Instrument is of a general nature only. It does not direct the IHPA to change a particular national efficient price for health care services provided by public hospitals or a particular efficient cost for health care services provided by public hospitals between hospitals and sponsors.

 

Consultation

Subsection 226(2) of the Act provides that the Minister must consult with the Standing Council on Health before giving a direction. Subsection 230(1) specifies the meaning of Standing Council on Health to be as follows:

 

The Standing Council on Health is (subject to subsection (2)) the Ministerial Council by that name, or, if there is no such Ministerial Council, the standing Ministerial Council established or recognised by COAG whose members include all Ministers in Australia having portfolio responsibility for health.”

 

The Minister for Health, the Hon. Greg Hunt MP, has written to State and Territory Health Ministers on his intention to issue a direction under subsection 226(1) of the Act.

 

This Instrument relates solely to the functions and powers of the IHPA. The activity that will be undertaken is not regulatory in nature. As such, a Regulation Impact Statement is not required.

 

This Instrument commences the day after registration on the Federal Register of Legislation.

 

This Determination is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2003 and under the provisions of section 44 of the Legislation Act 2003 the Instrument is not subject to disallowance.

 

 

Overview

The National Health Reform Act 2011 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for better coordination and efficiency in the health sector. This Act established the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA) and outlines its functions and powers. The Act aims to ensure that funding arrangements for high-cost, highly-specialised clinical practices and technologies are efficient and effective. As per the explanatory statement, this legislation was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive understanding of the costing and pricing of services provided under the Nationally Funded Centres (NFC) Program. The NFC Program was endorsed in 1990 to facilitate the public sector provision of such services, and this Act aims to integrate it into the National Health Reform Agreement funding arrangements. The policy objective is to improve service delivery and achieve better health outcomes through efficient health system practices.

Scope and Application

The National Health Reform Act 2011, through the Direction to the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority on the performance of its functions, applies specifically to the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA) and its role in determining the costs and pricing of the Nationally Funded Centres (NFC) Program. The NFC Program, established to manage high-cost, highly specialised clinical practices and technologies with limited demand, is overseen by the IHPA under this Act. The Act mandates that the IHPA must conduct a costing and pricing study into the NFC Program, exploring the direct and indirect costs of service provision, the aggregate costs, projected costs, and existing costs. Furthermore, the IHPA is directed to provide the Commonwealth and the States and Territories with options regarding funding mechanisms for the NFC Program, such as Activity Based Funding or block funding arrangements. This legislative instrument applies nationally, as it involves the coordination of health services across multiple jurisdictions within Australia. The Act does not extend to altering specific national efficient prices or efficient costs for health care services provided by public hospitals. This legislative instrument is of general nature and does not constitute a regulatory activity, hence it does not require a Regulation Impact Statement. The Minister for Health must consult with the Standing Council on Health before issuing any direction under this Act, ensuring that all relevant health ministers are informed and have input into the decision-making process.

Key Provisions

The National Health Reform Act 2011 (the Act) authorises the Minister to provide directions to the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (IHPA) in relation to its functions and powers, as outlined in sections 226(1) and 131(1) of the Act. This particular instrument, made under section 226(1), directs the IHPA to undertake a costing and pricing study into the Nationally Funded Centres (NFC) Program. The study aims to examine the direct and indirect costs associated with providing each NFC service at specified sites, the aggregate costs across all sites, the projected costs for all NFC services, and the existing costs for each patient in each specified site. Furthermore, the IHPA is tasked with providing options to the Commonwealth and the States and Territories regarding the funding arrangements for NFC services, such as whether they should be funded through Activity Based Funding or block funding under the National Health Reform Agreement (NHRA). The instrument also requires the IHPA to develop and operate cost models and pricing models for the NFC Program, covering both existing and potential future services. This study is intended to aid in achieving better health outcomes and health system efficiencies for the public sector provision of high-cost, highly specialised clinical practices and technologies with limited demand. Under the Act, the IHPA is obliged to comply with the Minister's direction regarding the costing and pricing study and the provision of options to the Commonwealth and the States and Territories. The IHPA must conduct the study in accordance with the outlined objectives and submit its findings and recommendations to the relevant authorities. The Minister for Health has already consulted with State and Territory Health Ministers, as required by section 226(2) of the Act, by notifying them of the intention to issue the direction. This consultation is an essential part of the legislative process to ensure that the directions align with the views and needs of all stakeholders involved in the NFC Program. Breach of the Minister's direction to the IHPA under section 226(1) of the Act is not explicitly stated to incur specific penalties or consequences in the explanatory statement. However, the IHPA's failure to comply with the direction could potentially lead to civil or administrative consequences, as the Act and other related legislation may provide for enforcement mechanisms and sanctions in such cases. The Minister's direction is of a general nature only and does not direct the IHPA to change particular national efficient prices or efficient costs for health care services provided by public hospitals. This ensures that the direction remains within the scope of the IHPA's functions and powers and does not interfere with other aspects of the health care pricing and funding arrangements. The instrument is not subject to disallowance under section 44 of the Legislation Act 2003, which means that it cannot be overturned by a resolution of either House of Parliament.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.