Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations (Amendment)

Administered by Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Legislation au F1996B00654 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations (Amendment) 1992 No. 118

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

STATUTORY RULES 1992 No. 118

Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade

Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act 1967

Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations (Amendment)

Section 15 of the Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act 1967 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations necessary or convenient to be prescribed for the carrying out or giving effect to the Act.

Subsection 7(1) of the Act provides, inter alia, that Articles 22 and 29 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (the Vienna Convention) have the force of law in Australia and every external Territory. Articles 22, paragraph 2, and 29 of the Vienna Convention provide:

Article 22

2.       The receiving State is under a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect the premises of the mission against any intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of the peace of the mission or impairment of its dignity.

Article 29

The person of a diplomatic agent shall be inviolable. He shall not be liable to any form of arrest or detention. The receiving State shall treat him with due respect and shall take all appropriate steps to prevent any attack on his person, freedom or dignity.

Paragraph 7(2)(a) of the Act provides that references in the Vienna Convention to the "receiving State" shall be read as references to Australia, or where the context permits, to every State and Territory.

Australia has an international obligation under the Vienna Convention to take appropriate steps to prevent not only disturbance of the peace in relation to a foreign mission but also impairment of its dignity. Situations can arise where, as a consequence of the nature, proximity and duration of a demonstration, even one wholly non-violent in character, steps such as the removal or relocation of material associated with a demonstration may have to be taken if Australia is to properly discharge its international obligations. Specific authority in law to enable such "appropriate steps" to be taken is required because although section 7 of the Act imposes a duty on the Commonwealth, it does not expressly confer powers to enable the discharge of that duty.

Accordingly, amendments to the Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations (the Regulations), being Statutory Rules 1992 No. 7, ware made by the Governor-General in Council to enable Australia to meet its obligations under the Vienna Convention by empowering the Australian Federal Police, or the Australian Protective Service, to remove or relocate material or objects associated with a demonstration away from mission premises, or the private residence of a diplomat, when the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade certified that such removal or relocation was an "appropriate step" under Articles 22.2 or 29 of the Vienna Convention to prevent an attack on or disturbance of the peace, or impairment of the dignity, of a mission or diplomat.

In the light of comments made by Mr Justice Ryan of the Federal Court of Australia concerning the validity of Statutory Rules 1992 No. 7, the Regulations were amended to clarify that the power of the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade to certify removal or relocation of objects is an "appropriate step" to give effect to Articles 22.2 or 29 arises only when a disturbance of the peace, or impairment of the dignity, of a mission or diplomatic agent is in fact occurring or threatened. other ancillary amendments were also made.

In the light of comments made by Mr Justice Olney in the Federal Court of Australia on 16 April 1992, a further amendment is proposed which seeks to make clear that the "impairment" of dignity is an objective precondition for the issuing of a certificate under the Regulations. An amendment seeking to put beyond doubt the powers of the Police and members of the Australian Protective Services to relocate objects which have been removed and other ancillary amendments are also proposed.

Details of the Regulations are set out in the Attachment.

ATTACHMENT

Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations (Amendment)

Regulation 1: This Regulation provides for the amendment of the principal Regulations as set out below.

Regulation 2: This Regulation amends Regulation 5A of the principal Regulations as follows:

2.1 By omitting subregulations 5A(1) and (2) and substituting:

11(1)       Where the presence of a prescribed object on prescribed land or premises impairs, or (if it were to take place or continue) would impair, the dignity of a mission or the residence of the head, or another diplomatic agent, of a mission, and the removal of the object would be an appropriate step to prevent the impairment, or the continuation of the impairment, the Minister may certify to that effect.

(2)       A certificate must be in the form set out in the Schedule".

2.2       The word "issued" is omitted from subregulation 5A(3) and the word "signed" is substituted.

2.3       The word "issued" is omitted from subregulation 5A(4) and the word "signed" is substituted.

2.4       The word "issue" is omitted from subregulation 5A(5) and the word "signing" is substituted.

2.5 The word "issued" is omitted from subregulation 5A(6) and the word "signed" is substituted.

Regulation 3: This Regulation amends Regulation 5B of the principal Regulations as follows:

3.1 Subregulations 5B(3) and (4) are omitted and substituted by :

"(3)       A prescribed officer must not remove a prescribed object from the prescribed land or premises before giving a reasonable opportunity to a person:

(a)       who is apparently in control of the object; or

(b)       who placed the object on the land or premises; or

(c)       who is apparently a representative of a person referred to in paragraph (a) or (b);

to remove the object from the land or premises.

(4)       Where a prescribed officer removes a prescribed object from the prescribed land or premises, the officer may:

(a)       give the object to a person who was apparently in control of the object, or is a person referred to in paragraph (3)(b) or (c); or

(b)       leave the object on other land or premises; or

(c)       retain the object for up to 7 days.

(4A)       Before leaving a prescribed object on land or premises referred to in paragraph (4)(b), a prescribed officer must give any of the persons referred to in paragraph (3)(a), (b) or (c) at least 24 hours' notice of the location of the land or premises."

3.2 The word "At" is omitted from subregulation 5B(5)and the words "Where an object is retained under paragraph (4)(c) and has not been returned to a person referred to in paragraph 3(a),(b) or (c), at" are substituted.

3.3 The phrase "or (b)" is omitted from subregulation 5B(5) and the phrase "(b) or (c)" is substituted.

Regulation 4: This regulation omits the Schedule and substitutes:

"                                                           SCHEDULE

Subregulation 5A(2)

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations

CERTIFICATE

I, (insert the full name of the Minister), Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and Trade, certify that the presence of the following prescribed objects:

(insert a description of the prescribed objects)

on prescribed land or premises, being (insert a description of the land or premises), impairs or (if it were to take place or continue) would impair, the dignity of the mission or of the residence of the head, or another diplomatic agent, of the mission and that its removal would be an appropriate step to prevent the impairment or the continuation of the impairment (here insert a description of the mission or residence).

This certificate was signed (insert time and date of signature) and has effect

           *from that time and date

           *from (insert time and date from which certificate is to have effect).

(signature of Minister) Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and Trade

Omit if inapplicable."

 

Overview

The Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations (Amendment) 1992, made under the authority of the Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act 1967, was enacted to address the need for Australia to meet its obligations under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations by providing specific legislative powers to the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Protective Service. These amendments were introduced to empower these agencies to remove or relocate material or objects associated with demonstrations that might threaten the peace or dignity of diplomatic missions or diplomats in Australia. The objective of the legislation is to enable Australia to take appropriate steps to prevent disturbances or impairments of the dignity of diplomatic missions and diplomats, in accordance with Articles 22 and 29 of the Vienna Convention. The Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations (Amendment) 1992 were made by the Governor-General in Council to provide the necessary legal authority for these actions, responding to the need for a clearer legislative framework as highlighted by judicial comments regarding the validity and scope of the original regulations.

Scope and Application

The Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations (Amendment) 1992 applies to the protection of diplomatic missions and their personnel in Australia, ensuring compliance with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. These Regulations empower the Australian Federal Police or the Australian Protective Service to remove or relocate material or objects associated with demonstrations when deemed necessary by the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade to prevent an attack or disturbance of the peace or impairment of dignity of a diplomatic mission or diplomat. The regulations clarify that the Minister's authority to certify removal or relocation of objects as an "appropriate step" under the Vienna Convention arises only when a disturbance of the peace or impairment of dignity is occurring or threatened. The Regulations amend the Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations to correct the interpretation of the existing provisions and to clarify the powers of the Minister and the law enforcement officers involved in such actions. The amendments ensure that the removal or relocation of objects is an objective precondition for issuing a certificate under the Regulations and that the powers of the Police and members of the Australian Protective Service to relocate removed objects are clear.

Key Provisions

The Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations (Amendment) 1992 (No. 118) amends the Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations (the Regulations), originally established under the Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act 1967 (the Act). These amendments were made to better align the Regulations with Australia's international obligations under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, particularly Articles 22 and 29. Under Article 22, paragraph 2, the receiving State (in this case, Australia) is obligated to take appropriate steps to protect the premises of a foreign mission and prevent any disturbance of the peace or impairment of the mission's dignity. Article 29 stipulates that the person of a diplomatic agent shall be inviolable and not subject to any form of arrest or detention, and that the receiving State must take all appropriate steps to prevent any attack on their person, freedom, or dignity. The Regulations (Amendment) 1992 specifically grants the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the authority to certify that the removal or relocation of objects associated with a demonstration is an "appropriate step" under the Vienna Convention to prevent an attack on or disturbance of the peace, or impairment of the dignity, of a mission or diplomat. This amendment provides the Australian Federal Police or the Australian Protective Service with the legal power to remove or relocate such objects from mission premises or the private residence of a diplomat when the Minister certifies that such action is necessary. Moreover, the Regulations were amended to clarify that the Minister's power to certify the removal or relocation of objects is applicable only when a disturbance of the peace or impairment of dignity is occurring or is threatened. The Regulations (Amendment) 1992 also impose specific obligations on the parties involved. The Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade must certify in writing that the presence of a prescribed object on prescribed land or premises impairs or would impair the dignity of a mission or the residence of a diplomatic agent, and that the removal of the object is an appropriate step to prevent the impairment or continuation of the impairment. This certification must be signed and dated, and it must be provided in the form set out in the Schedule to the Regulations. Furthermore, prescribed officers, such as members of the Australian Federal Police or the Australian Protective Service, must not remove a prescribed object from the prescribed land or premises without giving reasonable opportunity to a person who is apparently in control of the object, who placed the object on the land or premises, or who is a representative of such a person, to remove the object. If an object is removed, the prescribed officer must either give the object to the person who was apparently in control, leave the object on other land or premises, or retain the object for up to seven days, providing notice of the location if it is left on other land or premises. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Regulations (Amendment) 1992 may result in legal consequences. While the Regulations themselves do not explicitly outline specific penalties for non-compliance, breaches of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations could lead to international diplomatic disputes or legal actions. The Minister's certification of the removal or relocation of objects is subject to judicial review, and any improper certification could be challenged in court. Additionally, any actions taken by prescribed officers without the Minister's certification or in contravention of the Regulations could be deemed unlawful, potentially leading to civil or administrative penalties as prescribed by other relevant laws.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
International Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Diplomatic Immunity

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.