EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Issued by the authority of the Minister for Finance and Deregulation
The instrument to which this explanatory statement relates | Determination to Reduce Appropriations Upon Request (No. 2 of 2010-2011) |
Date instrument was made | 20 October 2010 |
The legislative authority under which the instrument is made | Subsection 10(2) of Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2009‑2010 enables the Minister for Finance and Deregulation to make a determination reducing a departmental item for an agency by the amount specified in the determination, upon receipt of a written request from the Minister responsible for that agency. A determination made under subsection 10(2) is a Legislative Instrument and is disallowable. |
Purpose and effect of the instrument | Schedule 1, Item 1 of the Instrument determines that the departmental item for Centrelink in Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2009‑2010 be reduced by $121,604,393. The effect of this Instrument is to reduce the departmental item for Centrelink in Schedule 1 of Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2009-2010 by the amount of $121,604,393. |
Background | The Minister for Human Services wrote to the Finance Minister on 28 September 2010 requesting a determination to reduce Centrelink’s departmental item under Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2009-2010. A portion of Centrelink’s departmental appropriation is based on the Centrelink Funding Model that uses forecasts of client numbers to derive an estimate of salary and supplier expenses expected to be incurred in the Budget year. The Minister for Human Services advised that $121,604,393 of the 2009-10 departmental appropriation derived by the Centrelink Funding Model is surplus to requirements. The surplus is a result of actual customer numbers being lower than forecast for 2009-10. |
Notes on the Instrument | The Schedule to the Instrument contains a table listing the affected agency in column 1, the appropriation Act and appropriation item in column 2, which through the request by the responsible Minister in column 3, is reduced by the amount in column 4. In accordance with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, Centrelink was consulted in the preparation of this Instrument. |
Overview
The Determination to Reduce Appropriations Upon Request (No. 2 of 2010-2011) was enacted on 20 October 2010 by the Minister for Finance and Deregulation under the authority of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2009-2010. This legislation was introduced to address a surplus in the departmental appropriation of Centrelink, which arose because the actual customer numbers for the 2009-10 budget year were lower than the forecasts used in the Centrelink Funding Model. The Minister for Human Services identified this surplus and requested a reduction in Centrelink’s departmental item by $121,604,393 to better align with the actual expenditure needs. The policy objective of this determination is to ensure fiscal efficiency and accuracy in government spending by reducing the appropriation in response to the lower-than-expected client numbers.
Scope and Application
The Determination to Reduce Appropriations Upon Request (No. 2 of 2010-2011) is a legislative instrument made under the authority of the Minister for Finance and Deregulation pursuant to subsection 10(2) of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2009-2010. This determination specifically applies to Centrelink, an agency within the Australian government, and it pertains to reducing the departmental appropriation for Centrelink in the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2009-2010 by $121,604,393. This reduction follows a written request from the Minister for Human Services, based on a surplus arising from lower-than-forecasted customer numbers for the 2009-10 budget year. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this instrument is national, affecting the Commonwealth level of government, and it is limited to the specified appropriation for Centrelink. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within the text, and the instrument itself does not extend or restrict application through subordinate instruments. The instrument was disallowable and Centrelink was consulted in its preparation as per the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Determination to Reduce Appropriations Upon Request (No. 2 of 2010-2011) are found in Schedule 1, Item 1 (1). This provision mandates a reduction in the departmental item for Centrelink under the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2009-2010 by the amount of $121,604,393. The reduction is a direct result of the Minister for Human Services’ written request to the Minister for Finance and Deregulation, as provided for under subsection 10(2) of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2009-2010 (2). This legislative instrument is a Legislative Instrument and is disallowable.
The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Firstly, the Minister for Finance and Deregulation is required to make a determination upon receiving a written request from the Minister responsible for the agency in question (subsection 10(2)). In this instance, the Minister for Human Services made the request for Centrelink, citing a surplus in the departmental appropriation due to lower-than-forecasted customer numbers (3). The Centrelink Funding Model, which uses forecasts to estimate salary and supplier expenses, was the basis for this surplus (4). Additionally, the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 mandates that Centrelink be consulted in the preparation of this Instrument (5).
Breach of the provisions within this Act could result in both civil and criminal consequences. Although the explanatory statement does not explicitly outline offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the disallowance of the legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 is a potential outcome. Disallowance would render the determination ineffective, and any actions taken under its authority would be null and void (6). Furthermore, the Minister for Finance and Deregulation could be subject to administrative or legal scrutiny for failure to comply with the statutory requirements, which could lead to further consequences or penalties as deemed appropriate by the relevant authorities (7).