Explanatory Statement
Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2004-05, Section 9 – Reduction of Appropriations Upon Request
The instrument to which this explanatory statement relates
This explanatory statement relates to an instrument (the instrument) entitled “Determination to Reduce Appropriation Upon Request”, dated 30 June 2005 and numbered 7 of 2004-2005.
The legislative authority under which the instrument is made
Section 9 of Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2004-05 enables the Finance Minister to make a determination reducing departmental appropriations, upon receipt of a written request from the Minister responsible or, in the case of an agency in the Finance portfolio, the Chief Executive.
The provision was first included in Appropriation Act (No. 3) 2003-04 to enable excess departmental appropriation items, which do not automatically lapse, to be extinguished. Excess appropriation may arise where, for example:
- An amount is reclassified and appropriated again under another kind of appropriation;
- Efficiency savings result in a programme costing less than expected; and
- A programme under Government policy is abolished prior to the appropriation being expensed.
A determination issued by the Finance Minister pursuant to section 9 of Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2004-05 cannot reduce an appropriation item by more than the lesser of the amount requested by the responsible Minister or Chief Executive (as appropriate), and the balance of the appropriation item remaining in the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Purpose of the instrument
The instrument directs that departmental outputs appropriation for the Australian Electoral Commission in Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2004-05 be reduced by $592,395.
Background
On 24 June 2005, the Electoral Commissioner, Mr Andy Becker, wrote to the Minister for Finance and Administration seeking a reduction of the Australian Electoral Commission’s departmental outputs appropriation in Appropriation Act (No.1) 2004-05 by $592,395. The appropriation was provided to the Commission to implement one of the recommendations of the 2001 Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters but the necessary amendments to the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 have not proceeded, resulting in an excess of appropriation for the Australian Electoral Commission.
Notes on the instrument
The instrument provides that the appropriation item in column 1 for the Australian Electoral Commission be reduced in response to a request made by the Chief Executive in column 4 by the amount listed in column 6.
Overview
The Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2004-05 was enacted to facilitate the management of government finances, including the ability to adjust appropriations in response to changing circumstances or needs. This Act, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, was introduced to address the issue of excess appropriations that do not automatically lapse and can accumulate when departmental outputs cost less than anticipated due to reclassifications, efficiency savings, or policy changes. Section 9 of the Act allows the Finance Minister to reduce departmental appropriations upon a written request from the responsible Minister or Chief Executive, ensuring that unused funds are reallocated or returned to the Consolidated Revenue Fund. The policy objective is to maintain fiscal discipline and ensure that government funds are used efficiently and effectively. The explanatory statement clarifies that the provision was first introduced in the Appropriation Act (No. 3) 2003-04 to manage such financial surpluses.
Scope and Application
The instrument under consideration, titled "Determination to Reduce Appropriation Upon Request," issued on 30 June 2005, is an application of Section 9 of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2004-05. This provision empowers the Minister for Finance to reduce departmental appropriations based on a written request from the relevant Minister or, in the case of agencies within the Finance portfolio, the Chief Executive. The primary purpose of this legislation is to address situations where there is excess appropriation due to factors such as reclassification of funds, unanticipated efficiency savings, or the cessation of government programs before the appropriation is expensed. The authority for this reduction is limited to the lesser of the requested amount or the remaining balance of the appropriation in the Consolidated Revenue Fund. In this specific instance, the instrument reduces the departmental outputs appropriation for the Australian Electoral Commission by $592,395, following a request by the Electoral Commissioner, Mr. Andy Becker, due to the non-implementation of a 2001 Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters recommendation that rendered the appropriation surplus to requirements.
Key Provisions
Section 9 of the Appropriation Act (No. 1) 2004-05 empowers the Finance Minister to make a determination reducing departmental appropriations, following a written request from the Minister responsible or, in cases of agencies within the Finance portfolio, the Chief Executive. This section was initially introduced in the Appropriation Act (No. 3) 2003-04 to address excess departmental appropriation items that do not automatically lapse. Such excess appropriations may occur due to reclassification of funds, efficiency savings that result in lower programme costs than anticipated, or the abolition of a government programme before the appropriation is expensed.
Under this legislative provision, the Finance Minister can reduce an appropriation by no more than the amount requested by the responsible Minister or Chief Executive, and this amount must not exceed the balance of the appropriation item remaining in the Consolidated Revenue Fund. The most recent determination, dated 30 June 2005 and numbered 7 of 2004-2005, directs a reduction of $592,395 in the departmental outputs appropriation for the Australian Electoral Commission. This was prompted by a request from the Electoral Commissioner, Mr. Andy Becker, on 24 June 2005, following the failure to amend the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 as recommended by the 2001 Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters, leading to an excess appropriation.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties it governs are clear and straightforward. The Minister responsible or the Chief Executive must submit a written request to the Finance Minister if they identify an excess appropriation. The Finance Minister then assesses the request and ensures that any reduction does not exceed the requested amount or the balance of the appropriation item in the Consolidated Revenue Fund. For the Australian Electoral Commission, the determination reduces their departmental outputs appropriation by the requested amount, aligning the appropriation with the actual requirements.
In terms of consequences for non-compliance or breach of the provisions outlined in the Act, there are no explicit civil or criminal penalties stated in the text. However, the process of determining reductions and ensuring compliance with the appropriation limits is strictly regulated. The primary consequence of failing to adhere to these procedures would be the continued existence of excess appropriations, which could lead to financial mismanagement and inefficiencies in government spending. The legislative framework ensures that such excesses are addressed through formal requests and determinations by the Finance Minister, maintaining fiscal discipline and accountability.