Determination 2017/22: Remuneration and Allowances for Judicial and Related Offices

Administered by Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Legislation au F2017L01615 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement: Determination 2017/22:

Remuneration and Allowances for Judical and Related Offices

 

  1. The Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973 (the Act) establishes the Remuneration Tribunal (the Tribunal) as an independent statutory authority responsible for reporting on and determining the remuneration, allowances and expenses of key Commonwealth office holders.  These include members of Parliament, Judges of Federal Courts, most full-time and part-time holders of public offices including Specified Statutory Offices and Principal Executive Offices.

Consultation

2.     Section 11 of the Act advises that in the performance of its functions the Tribunal:

  • may inform itself in such manner as it thinks fit;
  • may receive written or oral statements;
  • is not required to conduct any proceeding in a formal manner; and
  • is not bound by the rules of evidence.

3.     The Tribunal normally receives submissions on remuneration from a portfolio minister, or a secretary, program manager or employing body (in respect of a Principal Executive Office) with responsibility for the relevant office(s).  The Tribunal will normally seek the views of the relevant Portfolio Minister prior to determining remuneration for an office.

4.     The Tribunal may reach a decision based on the information provided in the submission and other publicly available information such as portfolio budget statements, annual reports, corporate plans, legislation and media releases.  On occasion it may wish to meet with relevant parties or seek further information from the relevant minister or person making the submission.

5.     Amongst other relevant matters in deliberating on appropriate remuneration for an office the Tribunal informs itself on:

  • the main functions, responsibilities and accountabilities of the office;
  • the organisational structure, budget and workforce;
  • the requisite characteristics, skills or qualifications required of the office holder(s); and
  • the remuneration of similar, comparator, offices within its jurisdiction. 

Federal Circuit Court of Australia

6.     The Tribunal received a submission from the then Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit Court, the Honourable John H. Pascoe AC CVO, covering a number of matters including a request to change recreation leave arrangements for Judges of the Federal Circuit Court.  The Tribunal also received a letter from the Attorney General, Senator the Hon George Brandis QC, indicating his support for the changes to recreation leave.  The Chief Judge’s submission provided detail on the purpose of the changed arrangements, and the impact on the operations of the Court. 


7.     In effect, the determination:

  1. increases recreation leave entitlements for Judges of the Federal Circuit Court appointed from 1 January 2018 from four weeks to six weeks, accruing at the time of the Judge’s appointment, and for each other year – on 1 January of that year, to be used only in the year in which the leave accrued, and to be paid on leaving office as though the Judge were then to take the balance of the recreation leave to which they were entitled.

Example 1: A Judge accrues six weeks recreation leave on 1 January of a year, the Judge does not take any leave during that year.  The Judge accrues 6 weeks recreation leave on 1 January in the subsequent year, and forfeits the previous year’s entitlement.

Example 2: A Judge appointed on 1 July of the year accrues, on appointment, three weeks recreation leave, that is required to be used within that same year, or is forfeited.

Example 3: A Judge accrues six weeks recreation leave on 1 January of a year, the Judge leaves office on 1 July of that year, not having accessed any of that leave, and is paid on leaving office as though the Judge was to have taken six weeks recreation leave.

b.      preserves existing recreation leave entitlements for Judges of the Federal Circuit Court appointed prior to 1 January 2018 (four weeks of paid recreation leave) accruing on 1 January each year (with provisions for cashing out and purchasing leave), with a once only revocable election to move to the new arrangements, and to retain his or her balance of recreation leave that accrued immediately before the election took effect, subject to certain conditions.

Example 4: A Judge appointed prior to 1 January 2018 with an accrued recreation leave balance of four weeks makes an election on 20 December to move to the new recreation leave arrangements.  On 1 January in the following year, the election takes effect, and the Judge accrues six weeks recreation leave with the carryover of four weeks remaining in a ‘bank’.  The Judge can take up to 6 weeks recreation leave in that year, and will retain the ‘bank’ of four weeks leave.  The four weeks will continue to be retained until such a time as the Judge leaves office when it will be paid out, or alternatively, will become available for use if the original election to move to the new arrangements is revoked (the leave would be available when the revocation takes effect).

Retrospectivity 

8.     Any retrospective application of this determination is in accordance with subsection 12(2) of the Legislation Act 2003 as it does not affect the rights of a person (other than the Commonwealth or an authority of the Commonwealth) to that person’s disadvantage, nor does it impose any liability on such a person.

The power to repeal, rescind and revoke, amend and vary

9.     Under subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

Details of the determination are as follows:

10. Clauses (i) and (ii) specify the authority for and commencement date of the determination.

11. Clause 1.1 specifies the Principal Determination (Number 9 of 2017 as amended) for the purposes of the determination.

12. Clause 1.2 sets revised recreation leave entitlements for a Judge of the Federal Circuit Court.

13. Clause 1.3 amends Clause 2.9 in the Principal Determination by omitting the words ‘Cashing out and purchase of recreation leave for Judges of the Federal Circuit Court: Judges of the Federal Court’ and replacing it with ‘Transitional provisions for recreation leave for Judges of the Federal Circuit Court appointed before 1 January 2018: Subject to Clause 2.9A, Judges of the Federal Circuit Court who were appointed before 1 January 2018’.

14. Clause 1.4 provides for a Judge of the Federal Circuit Court appointed before 1 January 2018 to make a once only revocable election to be covered by the new arrangements under Clause 1.2, for such an election or revocation to take effect on the 1 January following the election or revocation, and for the Judge to retain the balance of his or her recreation leave that had accrued immediately before the election or revocation took effect, subject to certain conditions.

 

 

Authority: Subsections 7(3AA)

 Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973

Overview

The Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973 was enacted to establish the Remuneration Tribunal as an independent statutory authority responsible for determining the remuneration, allowances, and expenses of key Commonwealth office holders, including members of Parliament, Judges of Federal Courts, and holders of public offices. This Act was designed to address the need for a transparent and independent mechanism to set appropriate compensation for these roles, ensuring they are adequately remunerated for their responsibilities while maintaining public trust. The Act was passed by the Australian Parliament and its primary policy objective is to provide a fair and consistent framework for setting the remuneration of Commonwealth office holders. The Tribunal operates with significant flexibility, receiving submissions from relevant ministers and employing bodies, and is not bound by formal procedures or the rules of evidence in its deliberations. This allows it to consider a wide range of factors in making its determinations, including the functions, responsibilities, and accountabilities of the office, as well as the remuneration of similar offices. One of the recent determinations under this Act involves changes to the recreation leave entitlements for Judges of the Federal Circuit Court. Effective from 1 January 2018, Judges appointed on or after this date will accrue six weeks of recreation leave annually, accruing on 1 January each year and needing to be used within that year. Judges appointed before 1 January 2018 retain their existing entitlements of four weeks of recreation leave, with an option to elect to move to the new arrangements. This determination ensures that the Judges' recreation leave is managed fairly, providing flexibility while maintaining consistent standards across the judiciary.

Scope and Application

The Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973 establishes the Remuneration Tribunal as an independent statutory authority responsible for determining the remuneration, allowances, and expenses of key Commonwealth office holders. This includes members of Parliament, Judges of Federal Courts, and most full-time and part-time holders of public offices, such as Specified Statutory Offices and Principal Executive Offices. The Tribunal operates under broad powers to inform itself and may consider submissions from various sources, including portfolio ministers and employing bodies, and is not bound by formal procedures or rules of evidence. The Tribunal's determinations may be based on information provided in submissions, publicly available documents, and consultations with relevant parties. Notably, the Tribunal has recently determined to increase recreation leave entitlements for Judges of the Federal Circuit Court appointed from 1 January 2018, while preserving existing entitlements for those appointed prior to this date, with a provision for a once-only revocable election to adopt the new arrangements. This determination does not apply retrospectively in a manner that would disadvantage individuals, aligning with the Legislation Act 2003. The Act also includes provisions for the repeal, rescission, revocation, amendment, or variation of legislative or administrative instruments, ensuring flexibility in its application.

Key Provisions

The Remuneration and Allowances for Judicial and Related Offices Determination 2017/22, under the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973, primarily focuses on the adjustment of recreation leave entitlements for Judges of the Federal Circuit Court. The determination specifies that Judges appointed from 1 January 2018 will accrue six weeks of recreation leave each year, to be used within the year of accrual and paid out if unused upon leaving office (Section 1.2). It also provides transitional provisions for Judges appointed before 1 January 2018, allowing them to make a once-only revocable election to adopt the new leave arrangements (Section 1.4). If they make this election, they can retain their accrued leave balance from before the election took effect (Section 1.4). The Tribunal, as established by the Act, has the mandate to inform itself in any manner it deems appropriate and is not bound by formal procedures or rules of evidence (Section 11). In determining remuneration, the Tribunal considers the functions, responsibilities, organisational structure, and requisite qualifications of the office in question, alongside the remuneration of similar offices (Section 4). It typically seeks views from the relevant portfolio minister and may consult with other parties or gather additional information as needed. Entities and individuals subject to this Act must comply with the new recreation leave arrangements as stipulated. Judges appointed from 1 January 2018 are required to adhere to the six-week annual accrual limit. Those appointed before this date must decide whether to elect to the new arrangements, retaining their accrued leave balance under specific conditions. The Tribunal retains the flexibility to vary or revoke these provisions as necessary. Breach of the provisions set out in this determination could result in various consequences. For instance, if a Judge fails to comply with the stipulated leave accrual or forfeiture rules, they might face administrative penalties or other corrective measures. The exact nature and severity of penalties would be determined on a case-by-case basis, depending on the specifics of the breach and its impact on the court's operations. The Act itself does not specify maximum penalties but leaves room for the Tribunal to impose sanctions that align with the severity of the non-compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Public Sector Management
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Transitional Provisions
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.