Declaration under subsection 196B(9) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 concerning Antiphospholipid Syndrome October 2024

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au C2024G00625 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

DECLARATION UNDER SUBSECTION 196B(9)

OF THE VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

CONCERNING ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME

OCTOBER 2024

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(9) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act), makes the following declaration in respect of the investigation concerning antiphospholipid syndrome notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette of  25 June 2024. 

The Authority declares that it does not propose to make a Statement of Principles concerning antiphospholipid syndrome, for the purposes of subsection 196B(2) or (3) of the Act, The reason is that the Authority is of the view that the sound medical and scientific evidence is insufficient to enable the Authority to determine factors for  antiphospholipid syndrome which might be related to service. The sound medical and scientific evidence is therefore insufficient in order to determine Statements of Principles for antiphospholipid syndrome either on the basis of reasonable hypothesis or balance of probability.

 

Dated 18 October 2024.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Professor Terence Campbell AM

Chairperson

by and on behalf of

The Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overview

The Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, enacted by the Australian Parliament, was established to provide a comprehensive framework for the entitlements of veterans and their dependants, ensuring that those who have served in the Australian Defence Force receive appropriate recognition and support. This Act was introduced to address the need for a structured and fair system to handle claims related to service-related injuries and conditions. The 2024 declaration under subsection 196B(9) of the Act, issued by the Repatriation Medical Authority, clarifies the Authority's stance on the investigation concerning antiphospholipid syndrome. The declaration states that due to insufficient sound medical and scientific evidence, the Authority does not propose to make a Statement of Principles concerning this condition, as it is not possible to determine factors related to service based on the available evidence. This decision reflects the Authority's commitment to basing its determinations on robust evidence to ensure the validity and fairness of its decisions.

Scope and Application

The Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 applies to veterans and their families, as well as entities such as the Repatriation Medical Authority, who are responsible for the assessment and determination of entitlements. The Act is administered at the Commonwealth level and covers matters related to the provision of medical, health, and other benefits for veterans, their spouses, and their dependents. The Act extends to the entire Commonwealth of Australia and includes provisions for subordinate instruments to further define or extend its application. In this instance, the Repatriation Medical Authority has issued a declaration regarding the investigation of antiphospholipid syndrome, clarifying that it does not propose to make a Statement of Principles due to insufficient medical and scientific evidence. This declaration pertains to the entire Commonwealth of Australia, and no specific exclusions or exemptions are mentioned in this particular notification.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Declaration under subsection 196B(9) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, dated 18 October 2024, pertain to the Authority's decision on whether to make a Statement of Principles regarding antiphospholipid syndrome (subsections 196B(2) and (3)). The Authority declares that it does not propose to make such a Statement of Principles (subsection 196B(9)). This decision is based on the Authority's assessment that the available medical and scientific evidence is insufficient to determine factors related to service that might cause antiphospholipid syndrome (subsection 196B(9)). The obligations imposed by the Act on the Repatriation Medical Authority include conducting a thorough investigation into antiphospholipid syndrome and evaluating the available medical and scientific evidence. The Authority must determine whether there is sufficient evidence to link antiphospholipid syndrome to military service, which would warrant a Statement of Principles. If the evidence is deemed insufficient, as in this case, the Authority must formally declare this position, as outlined in the document, ensuring transparency and accountability in its decision-making process (subsection 196B(9)). Any breach of the obligations set out in the Act could potentially lead to legal consequences. However, the specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for non-compliance are not detailed in the text provided. In general, breaches of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 could result in administrative penalties, legal challenges, or other repercussions, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The precise penalties would depend on the specific breach and would be determined in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act.

Legal classification tags

Instrument
Gazette Notice
Catchwords
antiphospholipid syndrome
medical evidence

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.