CUSTOMS TARIFF VALIDATION.
No. 19 of 1935.
An Act to provide for the Validation of Collections of Duties of Customs under Customs Tariff Proposals.
[Assented to 13th April, 1935.]
BE it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
Short title.
1. This Act may be cited as the Customs Tariff Validation Act 1935.
Validation of collections under Tariff proposals.
2. All duties of Customs demanded or collected, on or before the thirtieth day of November, One thousand nine hundred and thirty-five, pursuant to the Customs Tariff proposals introduced into the House of Representatives on the sixth day of December, One thousand nine hundred and thirty-four, shall be deemed to have been lawfully imposed and lawfully demanded or collected.
Overview
The Customs Tariff Validation Act 1935 was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address the need for validating customs duties collected under specific tariff proposals prior to the Act's passage. This legislation was essential in ensuring that the duties collected during a transitional period were deemed lawful, thus providing clarity and certainty for both the government and taxpayers. The policy objective of this Act was to affirm the legality of customs duties collected before its enactment, thereby preventing any potential disputes or financial implications that could arise from retroactive challenges to the collection of these duties. The Act thereby aimed to maintain the integrity of fiscal collections and provide a smooth transition under the new tariff regime.
Scope and Application
The Customs Tariff Validation Act 1935 applies to duties of Customs that were collected on or before 30 November 1935, pursuant to the Customs Tariff proposals introduced into the House of Representatives on 6 December 1934. The Act validates these collections, deeming them to have been lawfully imposed and lawfully demanded or collected. The Act has a national jurisdictional reach, applying to the Commonwealth of Australia. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the Act itself; however, it is possible that subordinate instruments could extend or restrict the application of the Act. This legislation ensures that any duties of Customs collected under the specified proposals prior to the date of the Act are recognised as lawful.
Key Provisions
The Customs Tariff Validation Act 1935 primarily consists of a few key provisions. Section 1 provides that the Act may be cited as the Customs Tariff Validation Act 1935. The most substantive section, Section 2, states that all duties of Customs that were demanded or collected on or before 30 November 1935, pursuant to the Customs Tariff proposals introduced into the House of Representatives on 6 December 1934, are deemed to have been lawfully imposed and lawfully demanded or collected. This means that any customs duties collected under these specific proposals are validated and recognised as lawful.
The Act imposes certain obligations on the parties involved, primarily to ensure the proper validation of customs duties collected under specific proposals. Section 2 requires that any customs duties collected in accordance with the Customs Tariff proposals introduced on 6 December 1934 be considered lawful. This validation applies to duties collected up until 30 November 1935, thereby providing a clear timeframe for the operation of the Act. The purpose of this validation is to avoid any legal challenges or disputes regarding the legitimacy of the collected duties.
There are no explicit offences or penalties outlined within the Act for breach of its provisions. However, the validation provided by Section 2 is crucial as it negates any potential legal challenges that could arise from the collection of customs duties under the specified proposals. In the event of a breach, which could involve the collection of duties outside the timeframe specified in the Act, the validated duties would not be recognised as lawful. This could potentially lead to disputes or legal actions, though specific consequences would depend on the context and the laws in place at the time. The Act itself does not prescribe maximum penalties but leaves the determination of consequences to the broader legal framework in which it operates.