CUSTOMS TARIFF (NEW ZEALAND PREFERENCE) VALIDATION.
No. 56 of 1940.
An Act to provide for the Validation of Collections of Duties of Customs under Customs Tariff (New Zealand Preference) Proposals.
[Assented to 22nd August, 1940.]
BE it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
Short title.
1. This Act may be cited as the Customs Tariff (New Zealand Preference) Validation Act 1940.
Commencement.
2. This Act shall come into operation on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.
Validation of collections under Customs Tariff (New Zealand Preference) proposals.
3. All duties of Customs demanded or collected (whether before the dissolution or expiry of the present House of Representatives or at or after that dissolution or expiry and on or before the twenty-first day of February, One thousand nine hundred and forty-one) pursuant to the Customs Tariff (New Zealand Preference) proposals introduced into the House of Representatives on the twenty-second day of May, One thousand nine hundred and forty, shall be deemed to have been lawfully imposed and lawfully demanded or collected.
Overview
The Customs Tariff (New Zealand Preference) Validation Act 1940 was enacted to address a legal gap arising from the collection of duties under the Customs Tariff (New Zealand Preference) proposals. Enacted by the Parliament of Australia, the Act aims to validate the collections of duties of Customs that were made under these proposals before the dissolution of the House of Representatives or within a specified period thereafter. The primary objective of the Act is to ensure that the duties collected under these proposals are deemed lawful, thereby providing clarity and legal certainty regarding the collections made during this transitional period. The Act came into operation immediately upon receiving the Royal Assent, ensuring that any duties collected under the Customs Tariff (New Zealand Preference) proposals were retrospectively validated.
Scope and Application
The Customs Tariff (New Zealand Preference) Validation Act 1940 applies to duties of Customs that were collected under the Customs Tariff (New Zealand Preference) proposals introduced into the House of Representatives on May 22, 1940. These collections were made either before the dissolution or expiry of the present House of Representatives or within the specified period up until February 21, 1941. The Act validates the imposition, demand, and collection of these duties, ensuring they are considered lawful. The Act operates on a Commonwealth level, impacting any entity or person involved in the collection of these duties. The geographic scope is specifically tied to Australia and New Zealand, reflecting the preferential tariffs intended between the two nations. The Act does not specify exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the text provided, but it does clarify the timeframe within which the collections must fall to be validated. Any further application or restrictions are to be determined through subordinate instruments or regulations.
Key Provisions
The Customs Tariff (New Zealand Preference) Validation Act 1940 (section 3) validates duties of Customs that were collected under the Customs Tariff (New Zealand Preference) proposals, ensuring that any duties demanded or collected before the expiry of the House of Representatives or on or before 21 February 1941 are deemed lawful. This encompasses both pre-dissolution collections and those made during a specific post-dissolution period. The Act thus aims to provide legal certainty to duties collected during a transitional period in the legislative process.
The Act imposes obligations on customs authorities and collectors to ensure that the duties collected under the specified proposals are treated as lawful. Collectors must adhere to the parameters set by the Act, ensuring that duties collected within the stipulated time frame are recognised as valid and authorised under the law. This includes maintaining accurate records of collections and adhering to the guidelines set forth in the Act to avoid any legal challenges to the validity of these collections.
Breaches of the provisions outlined in the Act could result in legal consequences for both the collectors and the entities involved. Although the Act itself does not specify particular offences or penalties, any actions that do not align with the legal validation provided could be subject to scrutiny and legal challenge. Collectors and authorities must ensure strict compliance with the Act to avoid potential civil or administrative repercussions that may arise from non-compliance.