CUSTOMS TARIFF (CANADIAN PREFERENCE) VALIDATION.
No. 21 of 1935.
An Act to provide for the Validation of Collections of Duties of Customs under Customs Tariff (Canadian Preference) Proposals.
[Assented to 13th April, 1935.]
BE it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
Short title
1. This Act may be cited as the Customs Tariff (Canadian Preference) Validation Act 1935.
Validation of collections under Tariff proposals.
2. All duties of Customs demanded or collected, on or before the thirtieth day of November, One thousand nine hundred and thirty-five, pursuant to the Customs Tariff (Canadian Preference) proposals introduced into the House of Representatives on the sixth day of December, One thousand nine hundred and thirty-four, shall be deemed to have been lawfully imposed and lawfully demanded or collected.
Overview
The Customs Tariff (Canadian Preference) Validation Act 1935 was enacted to address a legal gap arising from the imposition and collection of customs duties under specific tariff proposals. This Act was introduced to validate the collections of duties of customs that had been made under the Customs Tariff (Canadian Preference) proposals that were presented to the House of Representatives on 6 December 1934. The Act was assented to on 13 April 1935 by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia. Its primary objective is to ensure that all duties collected up until 30 November 1935 are recognised as lawfully imposed and collected, thereby providing legal certainty and avoiding any potential challenges to the legitimacy of these collections.
Scope and Application
The Customs Tariff (Canadian Preference) Validation Act 1935 applies to all duties of Customs that were demanded or collected up until 30 November 1935 in accordance with the Customs Tariff (Canadian Preference) proposals that were introduced into the House of Representatives on 6 December 1934. These duties are deemed to have been lawfully imposed and collected under the Act. The Act validates the actions taken under these specific proposals and ensures that any duties collected under this framework are considered legitimate, thereby protecting both the Commonwealth and the individuals or entities involved from any future legal challenges regarding the legitimacy of the collections. This Act has a national reach within Australia, as it is an Act of the Commonwealth of Australia, and applies to any person or entity that collected duties under the specified proposals within the designated timeframe. The Act does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, and its application is direct without extension or restriction through subordinate instruments.
Key Provisions
The Customs Tariff (Canadian Preference) Validation Act 1935 (hereafter the "Act") primarily consists of two sections. Section 2 of the Act validates all duties of Customs that were collected prior to the Act's commencement date, specifically up until the thirtieth day of November, 1935. This means that any customs duties collected in accordance with the Customs Tariff (Canadian Preference) proposals introduced into the House of Representatives on the sixth day of December, 1934, are deemed to have been lawfully imposed and collected (s. 2).
The Act imposes a formal validation on the collections of duties of Customs that were collected prior to its enactment. It seeks to ensure that these collections, which were made under the Customs Tariff (Canadian Preference) proposals, are legally sound and in compliance with the necessary legislative requirements (s. 2). This validation is crucial for ensuring that the duties collected during this period are not challenged on legal grounds and that the collections are considered legitimate.
Breach of the requirements stipulated in this Act would not explicitly outline any specific offences or penalties within the text. However, failure to comply with the validation process as outlined could potentially lead to legal challenges regarding the legitimacy of the customs duties collected. Such challenges could result in disputes over the legality of the duties, and potentially, the need for retrospective legal action to address any discrepancies that might arise from non-compliance with the Act’s provisions. The text does not specify maximum penalties, but any legal consequences would depend on the outcomes of any judicial proceedings initiated as a result of non-compliance.