Customs Regulations (Amendment)

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F1997B01003 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Customs Regulations (Amendment) 1996 No. 326

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

STATUTORY RULES 1996 No. 326

Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Small Business and Consumer Affairs

Customs Act 1901

Customs Regulations (Amendment)

Section 270 of the Customs Act 1901 ("the Act") provides in part that the Governor-General may make regulations not inconsistent with the Act prescribing all matters which by the Act are required or permitted to be prescribed for giving effect to the Act.

Section 168 of the Act provides that the regulations may make provision "for and in relation to allowing drawbacks of duty paid on goods imported into Australia".

Subsection 163(1) of the Act provides that refunds, rebates and remissions of duty may be made "in respect of goods generally or in respect of the goods included in a class of goods" and in "such circumstances, and subject to such conditions and restrictions (if any), as are prescribed..." and subsection 163(1A) provides that the "regulations may prescribe the amount, or the means of determining the amount, of any refund, rebate or remission of duty that may be made for the purposes of subsection (1). "

These amendments to the Customs Regulations ("the Regulations") provide for the eligibility for the payment of drawback in respect of goods on which any of the various dumping and countervailing duties under the Customs Tariff (Anti-Dumping) Act 1975 ("the Anti-Dumping Act") have been paid.

Drawback is a repayment of the duties previously paid on imported goods that is allowed on the exportation of the goods, or of goods incorporating them, or of goods produced or manufactured from them.

The Industry Commission in its report on Packaging and Labelling (February 1996) raised the issue of dumping duties not being eligible for drawback. As a result of this finding, the Government sought advice from the Australian Government Solicitor's Office which advised that while the head of power in section 168 of the Act is broad enough to support regulations being made for these duties, as the Regulations stood, these duties were not eligible for drawback because they could not be described properly as import duties.

It is in accordance with Government industry policy for drawback to be paid in respect of the various dumping and countervailing duties, as the underlying principle of the drawback system is that the Government has a policy which provides exports and exporter industries with the benefit of world price inputs.

To the extent that dumping duty is often substantial and, in theory at least, applies for a comparatively short period of time, it would seem that Australian exporter industries could be disadvantaged during that short period of time by the permanent loss of overseas markets due to increased costs, and therefore increased prices, on their exported production. In this regard, dumping duties could have a more immediate and .substantial effect on exporter industries than normal duties.

In addition, the amendments provide for a new refund circumstance where certain goods have been exported after 30 June 1996, and before the commencement on gazettal of these regulations, to permit a refund of any of the various dumping and countervailing duties under the Anti-Dumping Act.

The effect of these two sets of provisions is that from 1 July 1996 the amount of dumping and countervailing duties paid on the relevant goods can be returned either by way of refund, in respect of past exportations, or by drawback, in respect of exportations taking place after the date of gazettal of the Regulations.

Details of the Regulations are set out in the Attachment.

The Regulations commenced on gazettal.

ATTACHMENT

Regulation 1 - Amendment

Regulation 1 provides that the Customs Regulations ("the Regulations") are amended as set out in these regulations.

Regulation 2 - Regulation 126 (Circumstances under which refunds, rebates and remissions are made)

Regulation 2 inserts a new refund circumstance in subregulation 126(1) at paragraph (w).

This refund circumstance is designed to allow a refund of duty to be paid in certain circumstances where goods were exported after 30 June 1996 and before the commencement of new regulation 139 (regulation 4 refers) on gazettal of these regulations.

The relevant circumstances are:

(i) where dumping duty within the meaning of new regulation 139 was paid on the goods. The term dumping duty is defined in new regulation 139 to mean any of the following duties under the Customs Tariff (Anti-Dumping) Act 1975 (the Anti-Dumping Act): dumping duty, interim dumping duty, third country dumping duty and interim third country dumping duty, countervailing duty, interim countervailing duty, third country countervailing duty and interim third country countervailing duty (regulation 4 refers). This covers the situation where goods were imported into Australia and were then subsequently exported in the same form (subparagraph 126(1)(w)(i)); or

(ii) where the goods that were exported were specified goods within the meaning of subregulation 131 (1), as applied by subregulation 139(2) regulation 4 refers). This covers the situation where goods on which dumping duty was paid (as defined by new regulation 139(1) (regulation 4 refers) and set out above) were imported into Australia and were then used in the manufacture of other goods or were subjected to a process or to treatment in Australia and so were exported in a different form to that in which they were imported subparagraph 126(1)(w)(ii); or

(iii) where the imported goods on which dumping duty has been paid (as defined by new regulation 139(1) regulation 4 refers) and set out above) were used in the manufacture or treatment of other goods which were then exported. This covers the situation contemplated by regulation 132 of the Regulations, namely where imported goods on which dumping duty has been paid are mixed with like goods produced in Australia and the mixture or part of the mixture is used in the manufacture or treatment of other goods (subparagraph 126(1)(w)(iii) .

As the provisions which allow the drawback of dumping duty (as defined in new regulation 139(1) (regulation 4 refers) and set out above) did not commence until the gazettal of these regulations, the new refund circumstance provides the mechanism for allowing the return of dumping duty from 1 July 1996.

Regulation 3 - Regulation 128B (Calculation of refunds or remissions of duty)

Regulation 3 inserts a new subregulation 128B(6). This provision ensures that the amount of a refund that can be paid under new paragraph 126(1)(w) (regulation 2 refers) is the amount of drawback that would have been payable under the Regulations if the drawback provisions applying to dumping duties proposed in these regulations had been in force when the goods were exported.

Regulation 4 - New regulation 139

Regulation 4 inserts a new regulation 139 in the Regulations. This new regulation provides the basis for allowing the payment of drawback in respect of goods on which any of the various dumping and countervailing duties under the Anti-Dumping Act have been paid.

Part IX of the Customs Act 1901 ("the Act") contains section 168 which deals with "Drawbacks". This section provides that the regulations may make provision "for and in relation to allowing drawbacks of duty paid on goods imported into Australia".

The Industry Commission in its report on Packaging and Labelling (February 1996) raised the issue of dumping duties not being eligible for drawback. As a result of this finding, the Government sought advice from the Australian Government Solicitor's Office which advised that while the head of power in section 168 of the Act is broad enough to support regulations being made for these duties, as the Regulations previously stood, these duties were not eligible for drawback because they could not be described properly as import duties.

It is in accordance with Government industry policy for drawback to be paid in respect of the various dumping and countervailing duties, as the underlying principle of the drawback system is that the Government has a policy which provides exports and exporter industries with the benefit of world price inputs.

To the extent that dumping duty is often substantial and, in theory at least, applies for a comparatively short period of time, it would seem that Australian exporter industries could be disadvantaged during that short period of time by the permanent loss of overseas markets due to increased costs, and therefore increased prices, on their exported production, In this regard, dumping duties could have a more immediate and substantial effect on exporter industries than normal duties.

New subregulation 139(1) specifies the eight dumping and countervailing duties that are now covered by the drawback provisions. These are the following duties under the Anti-Dumping Act: dumping duty, interim dumping duty, third country dumping duty and interim third country dumping duty, countervailing duty, interim countervailing duty, third country countervailing duty and interim third country countervailing duty.

New subregulation 139(2) provides that each of the relevant drawback provisions of the Regulations (namely, regulations 129, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 136A, 136B, 137, 138A and 138B) apply in relation to imported goods on which dumping duty has been paid as if references in those regulations to import duty were references to dumping duty (as defined in new subregulation 139(1)).

New subregulation 139(3) provides that subregulations 134(2) and 134(3) are not applied in relation to imported goods if they were used in the manufacture or production of specified goods within the meaning of subregulation 13 1 (1) and the manufacture or production started before this regulation commenced.

Without this provision, imported goods that had been used in the manufacture or production of specified goods within the meaning of subregulation 13 1 (1) prior to the commencement of regulation 139 could not have been eligible for drawback as requirements to inform a Collector of the necessary matters under regulation 134 could not have been complied with.

 

Overview

The Customs Regulations (Amendment) 1996 No. 326 were enacted to address the problem of dumping and countervailing duties not being eligible for drawback under the existing regulations. These amendments were made under the authority of the Minister for Small Business and Consumer Affairs and are an amendment to the Customs Act 1901. The primary policy objective of these amendments was to align the drawback provisions with government industry policy, ensuring that exporters and exporter industries could benefit from world price inputs. The amendments aim to provide drawback for dumping and countervailing duties, thereby preventing Australian exporter industries from being disadvantaged by the temporary but potentially substantial impact of these duties. In response to the Industry Commission's findings, the Australian Government Solicitor's Office advised that while the existing regulations did not permit drawback for dumping and countervailing duties, there was sufficient legislative authority to amend the regulations accordingly. These amendments allow for the repayment of duties on the export of goods, either in their original form or as part of new products, ensuring that exporters can reclaim duties paid on imported goods that are subsequently exported. The amendments also provide for a refund mechanism for goods exported before the commencement of the new regulations, ensuring that exporters are not disadvantaged by the timing of the regulatory changes.

Scope and Application

The Customs Regulations (Amendment) 1996 No. 326, issued under the Customs Act 1901, primarily focus on the eligibility for drawback of various dumping and countervailing duties under the Customs Tariff (Anti-Dumping) Act 1975. These amendments apply to entities and individuals who have paid these specified duties on imported goods that are subsequently exported from Australia. The changes aim to ensure that such duties are eligible for drawback, aligning with the government's industry policy that seeks to provide exporters with the benefit of world price inputs. This policy adjustment seeks to mitigate the potential disadvantages faced by Australian exporter industries during periods when dumping duties are in effect. The amendments, which took effect from 1 July 1996, provide for the repayment of duties either through drawback for exports occurring after the gazettal date of the regulations or through refunds for exports that took place between 30 June 1996 and the commencement of the regulations on gazettal. The scope of the regulations is national, operating under the Commonwealth's authority. The amendments do not specify any exclusions or thresholds, and the application extends to all relevant industries and entities within Australia.

Key Provisions

The Customs Regulations (Amendment) 1996 No. 326, issued under the authority of the Minister for Small Business and Consumer Affairs, amends the Customs Regulations to introduce new provisions for the drawback of dumping and countervailing duties under the Customs Tariff (Anti-Dumping) Act 1975. These amendments allow for the repayment of duties previously paid on imported goods upon their exportation, or upon the exportation of goods produced or manufactured from them. The main sections of the Amendment include Regulation 2, which introduces a new refund circumstance in subregulation 126(1) allowing refunds of dumping duties paid on goods exported after 30 June 1996 and before the commencement of the new regulation 139. Regulation 3 modifies subregulation 128B(6) to ensure that the amount of a refund under the new paragraph 126(1)(w) matches the drawback that would have been payable if the drawback provisions for dumping duties had been in force at the time of export. New Regulation 139, introduced by Regulation 4, provides the basis for allowing drawback of dumping and countervailing duties, specifying the types of duties covered and applying relevant drawback provisions to them. The Amendment imposes specific obligations on parties and entities governed by it. For instance, entities seeking a refund or drawback must ensure that the goods in question meet the criteria set out in the Regulations. They must also comply with any conditions and restrictions prescribed by the Regulations. This includes adhering to the timeframes specified for claiming refunds or drawback, such as exporting goods after 30 June 1996 and before the commencement of the new regulation 139. Additionally, entities must provide necessary documentation and information to the Collector to facilitate the processing of their claims. The Amendment also delineates consequences for non-compliance. While the explanatory statement does not explicitly mention specific offences or penalties, breaches of the Customs Regulations can lead to civil or criminal penalties under the Customs Act 1901. Such penalties may include fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. The exact penalties depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as any relevant provisions of the Customs Act. Non-compliance with the new drawback provisions could result in the denial of refunds or drawback claims, thereby impacting the financial standing of entities involved in importing and exporting goods.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Regulatory Standards
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.