Statutory Rules
1973 No. 251
REGULATION UNDER THE CUSTOMS ACT 1901-1971.*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL of Australia, acting with the advice of the Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Customs Act 1901-1971.
Dated this fourth day of December, 1973.
PAUL HASLUCK
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
LIONEL MURPHY
Minister of State for Customs and Excise.
————
Amendment of the Customs Regulations†
Regulation 23a of the Customs Regulations is amended by inserting after sub-regulation (3) the following sub-regulation:—
“ (3a) For the purposes of paragraph 3 (b), a declaration bearing a facsimile of the signature of a person referred to in that paragraph shall be deemed to have been signed by that person.”.
* Notified in the Australian Government Gazette on 13 December 1973.
† Statutory Rules 1926, No. 203, as amended to date. For previous amendments of the Customs Regulations see footnote † to Statutory Rules 1973, No. 155, and see also Statutory Rules 1973, No. 155.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1973 No. 251, made under the Customs Act 1901-1971, were introduced to address an issue within the existing regulatory framework pertaining to the signing of declarations in customs procedures. This legislative instrument, enacted by the Governor-General on 4 December 1973, aims to streamline and modernise the customs declaration process by allowing declarations to be considered as signed if they bear a facsimile of the signatory's signature. This amendment responds to the need for efficient and reliable customs procedures, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of customs documentation. The policy objective behind this regulation is to ensure that the customs process is both effective and reflective of contemporary practices, thereby facilitating smoother trade and commerce within Australia.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rules 1973 No. 251, made under the Customs Act 1901-1971, pertains to the amendment of the Customs Regulations, specifically Regulation 23a, by introducing a new sub-regulation (3a). This amendment applies to all persons and entities involved in customs processes, including importers, exporters, customs brokers, and carriers, who must comply with the regulations to ensure proper declaration and documentation of goods crossing Australia’s borders. The amendment enhances the efficiency of customs clearance by deeming a declaration bearing a facsimile of a signatory’s signature as valid, provided the signatory is a person referred to in paragraph 3(b) of the Customs Regulations. This regulatory change aims to streamline the customs process while maintaining the integrity of the documentation requirements. The reach of these regulations is national, applying uniformly across all states and territories within Australia. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in this specific amendment, and the application of these regulations is further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments as deemed necessary by the relevant authorities.
Key Provisions
The main operative section of the Legislative instrument, Statutory Rules 1973 No. 251, pertains to the amendment of Regulation 23a of the Customs Regulations under the Customs Act 1901-1971 (sub-regulation (3a)). This amendment introduces a provision whereby a declaration bearing a facsimile of the signature of a person referred to in paragraph 3(b) shall be deemed to have been signed by that person. This essentially means that if a declaration is made with a facsimile of the authorised person's signature, it is considered as valid as if the person had signed it physically (Regulation 23a(3a)).
This amendment imposes certain obligations on the parties involved in the customs declaration process. Firstly, it requires that any declaration made under the customs regulations must be signed. If the declaration is made with a facsimile of the signature, this will be treated as a valid signature (Regulation 23a(3a)). This provision is likely intended to facilitate the customs process by allowing authorised persons to sign declarations electronically or via facsimile, thus providing flexibility in how declarations are authenticated.
Failure to comply with the requirements of the amended regulation could potentially result in legal consequences. Although the specific penalties for breach are not detailed within this legislative instrument, under the broader Customs Act 1901-1971, breaches of customs regulations can lead to substantial penalties. For example, misleading or incorrect declarations could attract fines or other sanctions. In severe cases, criminal charges may be brought against individuals or entities responsible for the breach, leading to imprisonment or significant fines, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach.