STATUTORY RULES
1916. No. 28.
PROVISIONAL REGULATION UNDER THE CUSTOMS ACT 1901-1914.
I, THE GOVERNOR GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby certify that, on account of urgency, the following Regulation under the Customs Act 1901-1914 should come into immediate operation, and make the Regulation to come into operation forthwith as a Provisional Regulation.
Dated this fifteenth day of March, One thousand nine hundred and sixteen.
R. M. FERGUSON,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
FRANK G. TUDOR,
Minister of State for Trade and Customs.
Customs Regulation.
Collector’s Sales.
Regulation 189 of the Customs Regulations (Statutory Rules 1913, No. 346) is hereby amended by the insertion after paragraph 2 of the following additional paragraphs:—
“(2a) The Collector reserves to himself the right to refuse the bidding of any person who has not satisfactorily complied with the conditions of previous sales.
“(2b) The highest bidder to be the purchaser; but if any dispute arise as to the last or best bidder, the lot in dispute shall be put up again and resold.”
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullet, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.2741.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1916, No. 28, titled "Provisional Regulation under the Customs Act 1901-1914," was enacted as an urgent measure to amend the Customs Regulations in the context of collector's sales. This Provisional Regulation was introduced by the Governor General in Council, acting on the advice of the Federal Executive Council, and it was signed into immediate effect by the Governor General R. M. Ferguson on the 15th of March, 1916. The regulation was overseen by Frank G. Tudor, the Minister of State for Trade and Customs. The problem this regulation addresses is the need for more stringent control over the bidding process in collector's sales conducted under the Customs Act, ensuring that sales are conducted fairly and disputes over bidding are effectively resolved.
The policy objective behind this Provisional Regulation was to provide the Collector with additional tools to manage sales and maintain order in the bidding process. By allowing the Collector to refuse the bidding of non-compliant individuals and to resell disputed lots, the regulation aims to uphold the integrity of the sales process. This was achieved by amending Regulation 189 of the Customs Regulations to include provisions that address these specific issues, thereby improving the management and oversight of collector's sales under the Customs Act.
Scope and Application
The Provisional Regulation under the Customs Act 1901-1914 pertains to amendments in the procedures for Collector’s Sales, impacting both individuals and entities involved in bidding on goods that are subject to customs regulation. This legislation applies across the Commonwealth of Australia, establishing uniformity in the process of conducting and resolving disputes related to Collector's Sales. The regulation specifically addresses the conditions under which a bid can be refused and outlines the process for resolving disputes regarding the identity of the highest bidder, ensuring clarity and fairness in these transactions. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in the provided excerpt, and the regulation is intended to operate immediately upon certification by the Governor-General. The scope of the regulation is further extendable through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional details or modifications to the existing provisions.
Key Provisions
The operative sections of the Customs Regulation focus on the procedures for Collector's Sales under the Customs Act 1901-1914. Specifically, Section 2(2a) of the amended regulation grants the Collector the authority to refuse the bidding of any individual who has not met the conditions of previous sales. This means that if a bidder has previously defaulted on payment or violated other terms, the Collector can deny them the opportunity to bid in future sales. Additionally, Section 2(2b) stipulates that the highest bidder shall be the purchaser, but in the event of a dispute over who the last or best bidder was, the lot in question will be put up for sale again. This ensures that any ambiguities are resolved through a fresh bidding process, aiming to maintain fairness and transparency in the sale procedure.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act primarily revolve around ensuring the integrity of the bidding process and the adherence to established conditions. Bidders must satisfy the conditions set forth in previous sales to be eligible to bid in future auctions conducted by the Collector. This includes fulfilling any financial obligations and complying with the terms and conditions of past transactions. The Collector, on the other hand, is required to enforce these conditions rigorously, denying bids from non-compliant bidders and resolving any disputes over bidding by conducting a new auction for the contested lot. These provisions aim to uphold the orderly conduct of sales and protect the interests of all parties involved.
Failure to comply with the regulations can lead to several consequences. For bidders, not meeting the conditions of previous sales can result in being refused the opportunity to bid, as outlined in Section 2(2a). This can have significant implications, particularly if the bidder is attempting to acquire specific goods or assets. Additionally, if there is a dispute over the identity of the highest bidder, as mentioned in Section 2(2b), the lot will be resold. This not only delays the sale but also potentially affects the price and the bidder's ability to secure the desired item. While the Act does not explicitly state penalties for non-compliance, the refusal to bid or the need for a re-auction can be considered significant deterrents and consequences for failing to meet the stipulated conditions.
The Act does not explicitly outline specific fines or criminal penalties for breaches of its provisions. However, the potential financial and procedural repercussions, such as being barred from future bids or having to participate in a re-auction, can be seen as implicit penalties. These measures ensure that the integrity of the bidding process is maintained and that the conditions set by the Collector are adhered to, thereby protecting the interests of all stakeholders involved in the sales process.