STATUTORY RULES.
1910. No. 15.
PROVISIONAL REGULATION UNDER THE CUSTOMS ACT 1901.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby certify that, on account of urgency, the following Regulation under the Customs Act 1901 should come into, immediate operation, and make the Regulation to come into operation forthwith as a Provisional Regulation.
Dated this 11th day of February, One thousand nine hundred and ten.
DUDLEY,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
R. W. BEST,
Minister of State for Trade and Customs.
Regulation 109 of the Customs Regulations made on the twenty-sixth day of October, 1909 (Statutory Rules No. 126/1909), is hereby amended as follows:—
The standard according to which duty shall be charged on Extract of Raspberry (non-spirituous) is hereby cancelled, and in lieu thereof the following standard for Fruit Extracts and Concentrated Fruit Juices is substituted:—
Fruit Extracts and Concentrated Fruit Juices (non-spirituous)—
Duty shall be charged on the quantity or equivalent of Fresh Fruit Juices into which such Fruit Extracts and Concentrated Fruit Juices can be converted as shown by chemical analysis, provided that in cases where the manufacturer states a degree of concentration greater than that shown by chemical analysis, duty shall be charged in accordance with the degree of concentration stated by the manufacturer.
Provisional Regulation under the Customs Act 1901 (Statutory Rule 1909 No. 136) relating to Concentrated Pineapple Juice (non-spirituous) in liquid form, manufactured by Max Hilbert, Hamburg, dated 7th December, 1909, is hereby cancelled.
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by J. Kemp, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.2374.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Provisional Regulation under the Customs Act 1901, enacted as Statutory Rule 1910 No. 15, was introduced to address the need for immediate amendments to the customs duty standards on certain fruit extracts and concentrates. This regulation was issued by the Governor-General on behalf of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting on the advice of the Federal Executive Council. The objective was to streamline the duty assessment on fruit extracts and concentrated fruit juices, ensuring they were taxed based on their actual or stated concentration levels. This regulation amended an earlier rule from 1909, cancelling the specific duty standard for Extract of Raspberry and introducing a new standard for fruit extracts and concentrated fruit juices, which would be charged according to the quantity or equivalent of fresh fruit juices they can be converted into, as confirmed by chemical analysis. The regulation also nullified a previous provisional regulation concerning concentrated pineapple juice manufactured by Max Hilbert in Hamburg.
Scope and Application
The Provisional Regulation under the Customs Act 1901 applies to the import and duty assessment of fruit extracts and concentrated fruit juices that are non-spirituous in nature. Specifically, it governs how duty is charged on these goods, substituting a new standard for the duty calculation based on the quantity or equivalent of fresh fruit juices into which such extracts and juices can be converted as determined by chemical analysis. This regulation ensures that duty is levied appropriately whether the declared concentration by the manufacturer aligns with the chemical analysis results. The regulation operates on a national level, affecting all importers and entities dealing with these products within the Commonwealth of Australia.
Furthermore, the regulation has a direct impact on entities such as manufacturers and importers of fruit extracts and concentrated fruit juices, particularly those who may be located overseas but are exporting these products into Australia. The regulation cancels previous standards and provisional regulations, thereby setting a uniform method for duty calculation across the Commonwealth. This ensures that all parties involved in the import and sale of these products are subject to consistent and fair duty assessment procedures. The scope of this regulation is extended through subordinate instruments that may further define or refine the application of the duty standards set forth within this provisional regulation.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Provisional Regulation under the Customs Act 1901 (Statutory Rule 1910 No. 15) include the amendment of Regulation 109, which cancels the existing standard for duty on Extract of Raspberry (non-spirituous) and substitutes it with a new standard for Fruit Extracts and Concentrated Fruit Juices (non-spirituous) (Regulation 109). This new standard specifies that duty shall be charged based on the quantity or equivalent of Fresh Fruit Juices into which such Fruit Extracts and Concentrated Fruit Juices can be converted, as determined by chemical analysis. However, if the manufacturer declares a higher degree of concentration than that confirmed by chemical analysis, duty shall be charged according to the manufacturer's stated concentration (Regulation 109). Additionally, the Provisional Regulation under the Customs Act 1901 cancels a previous Provisional Regulation concerning Concentrated Pineapple Juice (non-spirituous) in liquid form, manufactured by Max Hilbert, Hamburg (Regulation 109).
The obligations and requirements imposed by these provisions necessitate that manufacturers of Fruit Extracts and Concentrated Fruit Juices (non-spirituous) ensure that their products are subject to chemical analysis to determine the equivalent quantity of Fresh Fruit Juices. If the manufacturer states a higher degree of concentration, this declaration must be accurate and verifiable. Additionally, any declarations regarding the concentration of fruit extracts or juices must be truthful and substantiated to avoid any discrepancies in duty calculations.
Failure to comply with the provisions outlined in the Regulation may result in civil or criminal consequences. For instance, if a manufacturer falsely declares the concentration of fruit extracts or juices, this could lead to penalties under the Customs Act 1901, which may include fines or imprisonment. The exact penalties for such breaches would depend on the severity and intent behind the non-compliance, but the potential for significant legal repercussions underscores the importance of adhering to the stipulated requirements.