STATUTORY RULES
1975 No. 45
REGULATION UNDER THE CUSTOMS ACT 1901-1974.*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL of Australia, acting with the advice of the Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Customs Act 1901-1974.
Dated this twentieth day of March, 1975.
John R. Kerr.
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
(SGD) KEP. ENDERBY
Minister of State for Customs and Excise.
––––––—––––––
AMENDMENT OF THE CUSTOMS (PROHIBITED EXPORTS) REGULATIONS†
Third Schedule.
The Third Schedule to the Customs (Prohibited Exports) Regulations is amended by inserting after item 28 the following item:-
“29 | Urea”.
* Notified in the Australian Government Gazette on 24 March 1975.
† Statutory Rules 1958, No. 5 as amended to date. For previous amendments of the Customs (Prohibited Exports) Regulations see footnote † to Statutory Rules 1975, No. 19 and see also Statutory Rules 1975, No. 19.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1975 No. 45, made under the Customs Act 1901-1974, was enacted to amend the Customs (Prohibited Exports) Regulations, specifically addressing the need to prohibit the export of certain materials that could have national security implications or pose a risk to the environment. This regulation was introduced by the Governor-General of Australia, John R. Kerr, on the advice of the Executive Council and with the authority of the Minister of State for Customs and Excise. The policy objective behind this amendment was to control the export of hazardous or strategic materials by adding urea to the list of prohibited exports, thereby ensuring compliance with national security and environmental protection policies.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rules 1975 No. 45, made under the Customs Act 1901-1974, specifically pertain to the amendment of the Customs (Prohibited Exports) Regulations. This legislation applies to all individuals, companies, and entities involved in the export of goods from Australia, particularly those concerned with the export of urea. The scope of this regulation is broad, targeting any person or entity engaged in the export of goods, including urea, and thereby affects the relevant industries involved in the production, distribution, and exportation of such goods. The regulation has a national reach, as it is governed by Commonwealth law. The amendment adds urea to the list of prohibited exports, thereby extending the application of the regulation to this specific substance. The regulation does not explicitly state any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, but it is understood that its application is subject to any relevant subordinate instruments or further legislative amendments that may refine its scope.
Key Provisions
The regulation made under the Customs Act 1901-1974 introduces a new provision concerning the export of Urea. Specifically, section 29 of the Third Schedule to the Customs (Prohibited Exports) Regulations now includes Urea as a prohibited export (Third Schedule). This means that exporting Urea without the proper authorisation from the relevant authorities is now prohibited. This addition tightens the control over the export of certain chemical substances, reflecting a policy decision to restrict the export of materials that could potentially be used for harmful purposes.
The regulation imposes obligations on entities and individuals who are involved in the export of Urea. These parties are required to obtain the necessary authorisation from the relevant authorities before exporting Urea. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in legal consequences. The regulation also places the onus on exporters to ensure they are aware of the updated list of prohibited exports and to adhere to the necessary compliance measures.
Breaching the provisions of this regulation can lead to significant legal consequences. Under the Customs Act 1901-1974, failure to comply with the export prohibition can be considered an offence. The penalties for such an offence can be severe, potentially including substantial fines and imprisonment. The exact penalties would depend on the severity of the breach and the specific provisions of the Customs Act, but they can be significant. Furthermore, any party found in violation of these provisions may also face civil consequences, such as lawsuits for damages, depending on the impact of the unauthorised export.