STATUTORY RULES.
1904. No. 16.
Commonwealth of Australia.
Department of Trade and Customs,
Melbourne, 19th April, 1904.
CUSTOMS BY-LAW.—MINOR ARTICLES.
I, WILLIAM JOHN LYNE, the Minister of State for the Commonwealth of Australia, administering the Department of Trade and Customs, hereby make the following By-law.
WILLIAM JOHN LYNE,
Minister for Trade and Customs.
The Customs By-law of the 20th December, 1901, relating to Minor Articles for use in the manufacture of goods within the Commonwealth to be admitted free of duty, published in the Gazette on the 20th December, 1901, is hereby amended by omitting therefrom all reference to “Plates, Heel,” and “Plates, Toe.”
By Authority: J. Kemp, Acting Government Printer, Melbourne.
C.2816.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Customs By-law Minor Articles 1904, enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia, was introduced to refine the regulations surrounding the importation of minor articles used in the manufacture of goods within the country. This legislative instrument was administered by the Department of Trade and Customs and signed into effect by the Minister for Trade and Customs, William John Lyne. The by-law was an amendment to the Customs By-law of 20th December, 1901, specifically targeting the exemption of certain minor articles from duty. The policy objective behind this amendment was to streamline and clarify the customs regulations, ensuring that the importation processes for manufacturing goods are both efficient and transparent. This adjustment was a response to the evolving needs of the manufacturing sector and aimed to facilitate smoother trade practices within the newly formed Commonwealth of Australia.
Scope and Application
The Customs By-law, as amended by Statutory Rules 1904 No. 16, pertains specifically to minor articles intended for use in the manufacture of goods within the Commonwealth of Australia. This legislation applies to any person or entity importing such articles into Australia for manufacturing purposes. The amendment, which removes references to "Plates, Heel," and "Plates, Toe," refines the scope of minor articles eligible for duty-free admission under the Customs By-law originally established in 1901. The geographic reach of this by-law is national, encompassing all states and territories within the Commonwealth of Australia. It is pertinent to note that while this by-law delineates specific exclusions in the form of these particular plate types, it does not otherwise alter the exemptions or thresholds set forth in the original by-law. This amendment extends its application through subordinate instruments, ensuring compliance across all relevant industries and entities involved in the importation and use of minor articles for manufacturing purposes.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of this legislative instrument, the Customs By-law (Minor Articles), concern the amendment of an earlier by-law (section 1). Specifically, it removes references to "Plates, Heel," and "Plates, Toe" from the list of minor articles that are admitted free of duty (section 2). This alteration is significant as it updates the list of items that can be imported without incurring customs duty, thereby impacting the importation process and costs for manufacturers within the Commonwealth.
The obligations imposed by this by-law are primarily on importers and manufacturers who rely on these minor articles for their production processes. By removing specific types of plates from the list of duty-free items, the by-law necessitates that these parties now account for customs duty on these particular plates. This change requires importers to adjust their import declarations and financial planning to include these previously exempted items, ensuring compliance with the updated customs regulations.
Breaches of this by-law could lead to various civil or criminal consequences, although the specific penalties are not detailed in the text. Generally, failure to comply with customs regulations can result in fines, confiscation of goods, or even legal action against the individuals or entities involved. For minor infractions, fines might be imposed, whereas more severe breaches could lead to criminal charges, especially if there is evidence of deliberate evasion of customs duties. The maximum penalties, however, are not specified within this particular legislative instrument.