Customs Amendment Regulations 2008 (No. 4)

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2008L02025 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Select Legislative Instrument 2008 No. 102

 

Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Home Affairs

Customs Act 1901

Customs Amendment Regulations 2008 (No. 4)

 

Subsection 270(1) of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) provides, in part, that the GovernorGeneral may make regulations not inconsistent with the Act prescribing all matters which by the Act are required or permitted to be prescribed, or as may be necessary or convenient to be prescribed, for giving effect to the Act.

Part XVA of the Act provides for the making of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) in certain  circumstances; goods that are covered by a TCO may then be imported into Australia free from Customs duty or will be subject to a lower rate of Customs duty.  However, subsection 269SJ(1) of the Act provides, in part, that the CEO of Customs must not make a TCO in respect of goods declared by the regulations to be goods to which a TCO should not extend.

Regulation 185 of the Customs Regulations 1926 (the Principal Regulations) provides, that for the purposes of subsection 269SJ(1), a TCO should not extend to goods to which a general rate of Customs duty specified in the Customs Tariff Act 1995 (the Tariff Act) is 10%, unless subregulation 185(2) applies to the good, or to goods classified to a heading or subheading in Column 2 of Schedule 2 to the Principal Regulations, unless the good is listed in column 3 of Schedule 2. 

The amending Regulations add petroleum products, which are excise-equivalent goods, to the category of goods to which a TCO should not extend.  The amending Regulations ensure that importers of all excise-equivalent goods are not able to avoid paying the excise-equivalent rate of Customs duty on such goods by obtaining a TCO.

Subsection 4(1) of the Act defines excise-equivalent goods as goods prescribed by the regulations.  Regulation 1D of the Principal Regulations prescribes as excise-equivalent goods, goods classified under the headings or subheadings of Schedule 3 to the Tariff Act listed in that regulation.

Excise-equivalent goods are subject to Customs duty at a rate which is equal to the rate of excise duty that would have applied to the goods, under the Excise Tariff Act 1921, had the goods been domestically produced in Australia.  Excise-equivalent goods are goods such as tobacco, alcohol and petroleum products.  Item 6 of Schedule 2 to the Principal Regulations restricts TCOs from extending to tobacco and alcohol products, except ethanol absolute. Prior to the amending Regulations a TCO could have extended to petroleum products which meant that there was inconsistent taxation treatment between locally manufactured and imported petroleum products. 

The amending Regulations amend subregulation 185(1) of the Principal Regulations to extend the restriction on the making of a TCO to goods that are excise-equivalent goods.  The amending Regulations provide that a TCO is not able to extend to excise-equivalent goods other than:

a)        goods listed in Column 3 of item 6 of Schedule 2; or  

b)        goods classified to subheading 3817.00.10 or 3819.00.00 of Schedule 3 to the Tariff Act. 

Column 2 of item 6 of Schedule 2 to the Principal Regulations lists headings 1520.00.00 to 2403 of Schedule 3 to the Tariff Act.   A TCO cannot extend to goods classified to a heading or subheading between 1520.00.00 and 2403 inclusively, unless the good is listed in column 3 of item 6 as a good to which the restriction on the making of a TCO does not apply.   Goods classified to a heading or subheading covered by item 6 in Schedule 2 may also be excise-equivalent goods.  The amending Regulations retain the ability for a TCO to extend to goods listed in column 3 of item 6 of Schedule 2 to the Principal Regulations, even where those goods are also excise-equivalent goods.  Ethanol absolute is the only excise-equivalent good listed in column 3. 

Subheading 3817.00.10 of Schedule 3 to the Tariff Act covers mixed alkylbenzenes (a type of solvent) and heading 3819.00.00 of Schedule 3 to the Tariff Act covers certain hydraulic brake fluids and other liquids for hydraulic transmission.  These products are excise-equivalent goods, but unlike all other excise-equivalent goods are subject to a rate of Customs duty of 5% plus the excise equivalent rate of Customs duty.  The amending Regulations retain the ability, under Part XVA of the Act, for a TCO to be made to extend to these goods so that the liability to pay the 5% rate of Customs duty is removed.  Under item 50 of Schedule 4 to the Tariff Act, these goods, when the subject of a TCO, are still subject to the excise-equivalent rate of Customs duty.  

No consultation was undertaken specifically in relation to the amending Regulations as the amendments are of a machinery nature and are considered to have low impact on business. 

The amending Regulations commence on the day after they are registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

0809163A

Overview

The Customs Amendment Regulations 2008 (No. 4) were introduced to address the inconsistency in taxation treatment between locally manufactured and imported petroleum products, which was a gap in the existing regulatory framework. Enacted by the Minister for Home Affairs under the authority of the Customs Act 1901, these regulations aimed to ensure that the excise-equivalent rate of Customs duty is applied uniformly to all petroleum products, whether imported or locally produced. The policy objective was to maintain equitable taxation and prevent potential avoidance of excise duties through the application of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) to certain goods. The regulations achieved this by extending the restriction on TCOs to include all excise-equivalent goods, thereby preventing the exemption of these goods from the excise-equivalent rate of Customs duty. These amendments were considered to have a low impact on business and did not require specific consultation due to their technical nature.

Scope and Application

The Customs Amendment Regulations 2008 (No. 4) pertain to the Customs Act 1901 and aim to refine the application of Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) by amending the Customs Regulations 1926. Specifically, the Regulations prohibit the application of TCOs to excise-equivalent goods such as petroleum products, ensuring these goods are subject to an excise-equivalent rate of Customs duty. This amendment addresses the inconsistency in taxation treatment between locally manufactured and imported petroleum products. The Regulations apply to all entities and individuals importing goods into Australia, with particular relevance to importers of excise-equivalent goods. Geographically, the Regulations operate within the Commonwealth jurisdiction, influencing how Customs duties are applied across Australia. The exclusions within the Regulations are designed to prevent TCOs from extending to certain excise-equivalent goods unless they are specifically listed or classified under particular subheadings or headings in the Customs Tariff Act 1995. These exclusions ensure that the duty rates remain consistent and equitable. The Regulations are effective from the date they are registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments, ensuring timely implementation and compliance.

Key Provisions

The Customs Amendment Regulations 2008 (No. 4) primarily address the restrictions on Tariff Concession Orders (TCOs) in relation to excise-equivalent goods, such as petroleum products, tobacco, and alcohol (sections 270(1), 269SJ(1), and 4(1)). These amendments ensure that goods subject to a general rate of Customs duty of 10%, or those listed in specific tariff classifications, cannot benefit from a TCO unless explicitly excepted (regulation 185). The Regulations clarify that TCOs should not extend to excise-equivalent goods, except for those listed in Column 3 of Schedule 2 of the Customs Regulations 1926, or to goods classified under certain subheadings in Schedule 3 to the Tariff Act. Ethanol absolute remains the sole excise-equivalent good that can benefit from a TCO under these provisions. The obligations imposed by these Regulations require that the Chief Executive Officer of Customs refrains from making TCOs for goods that are specifically barred from such orders (subsection 269SJ(1)). Importers and other stakeholders must ensure that any goods they intend to import are not subject to these restrictions unless they meet the criteria set out in the Regulations. This includes verifying that the goods do not fall into the categories that are expressly excluded from tariff concessions. For breaches of these provisions, there are potential civil and criminal consequences. The Act does not specify particular offences under these Regulations, but general provisions within the Customs Act 1901 allow for enforcement actions against non-compliance. Penalties for contravening the Customs Act can include fines and imprisonment, with the severity of the penalty depending on the nature and extent of the breach. For example, under section 252 of the Act, an individual who commits an offence may face a fine of up to 10,000 penalty units and/or imprisonment for up to five years. For corporations, the fines can be substantially higher, up to 500,000 penalty units. These penalties reflect the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches related to the importation of goods and the duty obligations that accompany them.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Licensing & Registration
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.