Customs Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 4)

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2012L01077 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Select Legislative Instrument 2012 No. 71

 

Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Home Affairs

 

Customs Act 1901

 

Customs Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 4)

Subsection 270(1) of the Customs Act 1901 (the Customs Act) provides, in part, that the GovernorGeneral may make regulations not inconsistent with the Customs Act prescribing all matters which by the Customs Act are required or permitted to be prescribed, or as may be necessary or convenient to be prescribed, for giving effect to the Customs Act. 

The purpose of the amending Regulation is to amend the Customs Regulations 1926 (the Principal Regulations) to correct an error in the description of the prescribed equipment that can be used to undertake an internal non-medical scan under section 219SA of the Customs Act. 

Section 219SA of the Customs Act allows certain Customs officers to conduct an internal non-medical scan of a person in certain circumstances.  Subsection 219SA(1) of the Customs Act provides that an internal non-medical scan may only be conducted using prescribed equipment.  Section 219ZAB sets out the conditions for prescribing the body scan technology.  Specifically, for an internal non-medical scan, the regulations may only prescribe equipment that can produce an image that indicates a person is or may be internally concealing a suspicious substance. 

In Customs Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1), the Smiths Detection B-SCAN 16 HD-DV was prescribed as the equipment that may be used to undertake an internal non-medical scan.  However, the name of this equipment contained a minor error, and the amending Regulation has corrected this error.  The body scanner has not been deployed by Customs and Border Protection and will not be deployed until the error in the name has been corrected.

The amending Regulation repeals and substitutes item 1.1 in the table in regulation 176AA of the Principal Regulations to prescribe the Smiths Detection B-SCAN 16HR-DV body scanner technology for the purposes of section 219SA(1) of the Customs Act. 

Section 219ZAB(3) of the Customs Act provides that before the Governor General makes a regulation prescribing equipment for the purposes of subsection 219SA(1), the Minister must obtain from the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs a statement that:

(a)        the equipment can safely be used to detect suspicious substances;

(b)        use of the equipment poses no risk, or minimal risk, to the health of a person whom the equipment is used to search; and

(c)        a person does not require professional qualifications to operate the equipment.

The Minister obtained a statement in respect of the Smiths Detection Body Scanner from the CEO of Customs in relation to Customs Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1).  This advice equally applies in relation to the amending Regulation.

Subsection 219ZAB(4) of the Customs Act provides that before the CEO makes the statement to the Minister, he or she must consult with the relevant Commonwealth authorities, if any, that have expertise or responsibilities relevant to the matters addressed by the statement.

In addition, subsection 219ZAB(5) requires that if the CEO does consult any relevant Commonwealth authorities, he or she must provide a copy of any advice received from those authorities before each House of Parliament within seven sitting days of that House after the day on which the statement is given to the Minister.

The CEO of Customs previously consulted the Department of Health and Ageing and the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency in relation to Customs Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1).  The advice from those authorities also equally applies in relation to the amending Regulation.  This advice will be laid before each House of Parliament within seven sitting days after the day on which the statement was given to the Minister in relation to the Customs Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 1).

As the amending Regulation is of a machinery nature, no consultation was undertaken in relation to the amending Regulation.

The amending Regulation commences on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

Customs Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 4)

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in the definition of human rights in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Regulation

This legislative instrument prescribes the body scanner technology pursuant to section 219ZAB of the Customs Act 1901, for the purposes of section 219SA(1).

 

The Regulation commences on the day after registration on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

Human Rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage, impact on or limit in any way, the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in the definition of human rights at section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Conclusion

This legislative instrument does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Minister for Home Affairs

Overview

The Customs Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 4) was enacted to amend the Customs Regulations 1926 by correcting a minor error in the description of the prescribed equipment that can be used to conduct an internal non-medical scan under section 219SA of the Customs Act 1901. The regulation was issued by the Minister for Home Affairs, pursuant to subsection 270(1) of the Customs Act, to ensure that the prescribed equipment aligns with the legal requirements and standards set out in the Act. The policy objective of this regulation is to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of the customs scanning processes by ensuring that only correctly specified equipment is used for internal non-medical scans, thereby facilitating the detection of internally concealed suspicious substances while adhering to safety and health standards. The regulation did not require additional consultation as it was deemed to be of a machinery nature, and it commences on the day after its registration on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

Scope and Application

The Customs Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 4) amends the Customs Regulations 1926 to correct an error in the description of the prescribed equipment for conducting internal non-medical scans under section 219SA of the Customs Act 1901. This regulation applies to Customs officers who are authorised to conduct such scans and the specific equipment, namely the Smiths Detection B-SCAN 16HR-DV body scanner, that can be used for this purpose. The correction is necessary to ensure the equipment's name accurately reflects the approved technology. This amendment has no impact on the operational deployment of the equipment, as it has not yet been implemented by Customs and Border Protection. The regulation is made under the authority of the Minister for Home Affairs and is effective from the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments. It is compatible with human rights as recognised in international instruments, with no implications or limitations on human rights and freedoms.

Key Provisions

The Customs Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 4) (the Regulation) amends the Customs Regulations 1996 (the Principal Regulations) to correct an error in the description of the prescribed equipment that can be used to undertake an internal non-medical scan under section 219SA of the Customs Act 1901 (the Customs Act). Specifically, the Regulation repeals and substitutes item 1.1 in the table in regulation 176AA of the Principal Regulations to prescribe the Smiths Detection B-SCAN 16HR-DV body scanner technology for the purposes of section 219SA(1) of the Customs Act. The body scanner has not been deployed by Customs and Border Protection and will not be deployed until the error in the name has been corrected. Before the Minister could make the Regulation, section 219ZAB(3) of the Customs Act required that the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs provide a statement that the equipment can safely be used to detect suspicious substances, poses no risk or minimal risk to the health of a person whom the equipment is used to search, and a person does not require professional qualifications to operate the equipment. In addition, subsection 219ZAB(4) of the Customs Act required that before the CEO made the statement to the Minister, he or she must consult with the relevant Commonwealth authorities, if any, that have expertise or responsibilities relevant to the matters addressed by the statement. The CEO previously consulted the Department of Health and Ageing and the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency in relation to the equipment, and the advice from those authorities equally applies in relation to the amending Regulation. The Regulation imposes obligations on Customs to ensure that the body scanner technology prescribed in the Regulation can safely be used to detect suspicious substances, poses no risk, or minimal risk, to the health of a person whom the equipment is used to search, and a person does not require professional qualifications to operate the equipment. The Regulation also requires that the CEO of Customs consult with relevant Commonwealth authorities before providing a statement to the Minister, if any, that have expertise or responsibilities relevant to the matters addressed by the statement. Furthermore, if the CEO consults any relevant Commonwealth authorities, he or she must provide a copy of any advice received from those authorities before each House of Parliament within seven sitting days of that House after the day on which the statement is given to the Minister. The Regulation does not impose any offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach. However, the Customs Act provides for a range of offences and penalties for breaches of the Customs Act and the Principal Regulations. For example, section 268 of the Customs Act provides for a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment or a fine of up to $220,000, or both, for serious breaches of the Customs Act, such as smuggling goods or attempting to evade duty. In addition, section 270 of the Customs Act provides for a maximum penalty of 2 years imprisonment or a fine of up to $22,000, or both, for less serious breaches of the Customs Act, such as failing to comply with a direction given by a Customs officer. Furthermore, section 272 of the Principal Regulations provides for a maximum penalty of $11,000 for failure to comply with a requirement to provide information or documentation to a Customs officer.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Regulatory Standards
Prohibited Conduct
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.