EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
INFRINGEMENT NOTICE GUIDELINES (2006)
Customs Act 1901
Section 243XA of the Act provides that the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO) must develop written guidelines in respect of the administration of Division 5 of Part XIII of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) to which he or she must have regard when exercising powers under that Division. Division 5 relates to penalties that can be paid in lieu of prosecution for certain offences. Section 243XA provides that the guidelines are a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Under paragraph 6(d) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, the guidelines are legislative instruments.
Background
The CEO approved guidelines when Division 5 of Part XIII was inserted into the Act on 1 July 2002. Those guidelines were revoked in November 2004 and the CEO approved a new set of guidelines. The 2004 version of the guidelines have since been amended to provide clearer guidance to decision makers when deciding whether or not to serve an infringement notice. The amendments include:
a) clearer descriptions of the relevant offences under the Customs Act;
b) guidance on the impact of the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement on the false and misleading statement offences in sections 243T and 243U of the Customs Act;
c) clarification on the relevance of the number of false and misleading statement particulars or omissions in the relevant cargo or outturn report;
d) clarification that when considering whether a breach is part of an ongoing pattern of non-compliance, the context of the person’s compliance history will be considered;
e) clarification on the relevance of an overseas agent’s contribution to the commission of offences;
f) clarification that an infringement notice will not be served where a person has made reasonable efforts to comply with regulatory requirements and the person has been unable to comply due to an identified Customs system problem.
Instrument
The instrument “Infringement Notice Guidelines (2006)” approves the Infringement Notice Guidelines (2006) as the new guidelines in respect of the administration of Division 5 of Part XIII of the Act. This instrument also revokes CEO Instrument of Approval No. 21 of 2004 which approved the 2004 version of the guidelines.
Consultation
Consultation on the revised Infringement Notice Scheme Guidelines was conducted with Customs National Consultative Committee members. Additionally, submissions in relation to the revised Infringement Notice Scheme Guidelines were invited through a news item on the Customs Internet web page.
Commencement
The instrument commences on the day after it is registered.
Overview
The Infringement Notice Guidelines (2006) are an integral part of the Customs Act 1901, specifically developed to enhance the administration of Division 5 of Part XIII, which pertains to penalties that can be paid in lieu of prosecution for certain offences. Enacted under Section 243XA, these guidelines were introduced to address the need for clear and updated directives for the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) when exercising powers under the Act. The CEO is mandated to develop these guidelines, which are intended to provide better clarity and direction to decision makers regarding the issuance of infringement notices. The 2006 guidelines were developed to replace the 2004 version, incorporating more precise descriptions of relevant offences, the impact of international trade agreements, and other clarifications to ensure fair and consistent application of the infringement notice scheme.
These guidelines, approved by the CEO, serve as a legislative instrument and are subject to disallowance under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. The development of these guidelines was informed by consultations with the Customs National Consultative Committee and public submissions, ensuring a comprehensive approach to addressing any identified gaps in the original guidelines. This instrument commenced on the day after its registration, replacing the previously approved 2004 guidelines.
Scope and Application
The Infringement Notice Guidelines (2006) apply to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs, who must develop written guidelines regarding the administration of Division 5 of Part XIII of the Customs Act 1901. This part of the Act pertains to penalties that can be paid in lieu of prosecution for certain offences. The guidelines are designed to assist the CEO when exercising powers under Division 5, and they are mandated by Section 243XA of the Act. These guidelines apply nationally, given that the Customs Act is a Commonwealth Act, thus extending its reach across the entire country. The guidelines serve as a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and are subject to disallowance under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. The 2006 guidelines replace the 2004 version, providing updated and clearer guidance for decision-makers, including specific descriptions of relevant offences, considerations regarding compliance history, and clarification on various factors such as the impact of international agreements and system problems that might hinder compliance.
Key Provisions
The Infringement Notice Guidelines (2006) (F2006L01860) pertain to the administration of Division 5 of Part XIII of the Customs Act 1901. Under Section 243XA, the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (CEO) is required to develop and maintain written guidelines for exercising powers under this Division, which deals with penalties that can be paid in lieu of prosecution for certain offences. These guidelines are considered a disallowable instrument under Section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and are legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The 2006 guidelines, approved by the CEO, replace the previous 2004 version and have been amended to offer clearer guidance to decision-makers when considering the issuance of infringement notices.
The new guidelines, which became effective upon their registration, provide more precise descriptions of relevant offences under the Customs Act, including those affected by the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement. They offer detailed guidance on the significance of the number of false and misleading statement particulars or omissions in cargo or outturn reports and clarify the relevance of a person's compliance history and overseas agents' contributions to the commission of offences. Moreover, the guidelines state that an infringement notice will not be served if a person has made reasonable efforts to comply with regulatory requirements but was unable to do so due to an identified Customs system problem.
The obligations imposed by the Infringement Notice Guidelines (2006) on the parties and entities it governs are significant. The CEO must ensure that these guidelines are adhered to when deciding whether to serve an infringement notice. This involves carefully considering the context of the person's compliance history, the number of false and misleading statement particulars, and the impact of any identified system problems. The guidelines also require the CEO to take into account the contributions of overseas agents in determining the appropriateness of an infringement notice. Failure to follow these guidelines could result in improper decisions and potential legal challenges.
Breaching the requirements of the Infringement Notice Guidelines (2006) does not explicitly list specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences in the explanatory statement. However, it is implied that failure to adhere to these guidelines could lead to improper issuance of infringement notices, which could be subject to review and challenge in a court or tribunal. The consequences of such improper actions could include the nullification of the infringement notice, financial penalties, or other administrative sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court or tribunal. The precise penalties would depend on the specific circumstances of the breach and the resultant legal proceedings.