Customs Act 1901 - CEO Instrument of Approval No. 2 of 2005

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2005L00061 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

CEO Instrument of Approval No. 2 of 2005

Customs Act 1901

Background

Subsection 4A(1) of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) defines an approved form as a form that is approved, by instrument in writing, by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). Subsection 4(2) of the Act provides that the instrument by which a form is approved under subsection 4A(1), is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.

Subsection 64AB(3) of the Act requires the pilot or owner of an aircraft that is on a flight to Australia from a place outside Australia to report to Customs the cargo on board the aircraft that is intended to be unshipped at an airport in Australia.  Currently a computer cargo report is required at least 2 hours before the aircraft arrives at an airport if cargo is intended to be unshipped at that airport.  A documentary cargo report is required at least 3 hours after the aircraft arrived at an airport if cargo is intended to be unshipped at that airport. That is, if cargo is intended to be unshipped at Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne and the report is made by document, a cargo report will have to be provided at least 3 hours after the aircraft arrives in Brisbane specifying the cargo intended to be unshipped in Brisbane.  A report of the cargo intended to be unshipped in Sydney will have to be made at least 3 hours after the aircraft’s arrival in Sydney.  A third report will have to be made at least 3 hours after the aircraft’s arrival in Melbourne.

On 13 January 2005, item 3 of Schedule 6 to the Customs Legislation Amendment (Airport, Port and Cargo Security) Act 2004 (the Amendment Act) will replace subsection 64AB(3).  New subsection 64AB(3) will require the pilot or owner of a relevant aircraft to report to Customs all of the cargo that is intended to be unshipped from the aircraft either 2 hours before the aircraft arrives at its first airport in Australia or 3 hours after it arrives at that first airport in Australia (depending on how the report is made).  Hence, in the example above, the master or owner will have to report all of the cargo intended to be unshipped in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne not later than 3 hours after the aircraft arrives in Brisbane.

Subsection 64AB(4) of the Act provides, in part, that a documentary report of the cargo intended to be unshipped from an aircraft at a particular airport must:

a)        be in the approved form for air cargo; and

b)        contain the information required by the form; or particulars of the person who is able to provide the information required by the form; and

c)        be signed in a manner specified in the form.

Instrument

CEO Instrument No. 1 of 2005 approves a new form for the purposes of communicating to Customs a documentary cargo report in respect of cargo that is on board an aircraft and is intended to be unshipped at an airport in Australia.  The form has been amended to require the pilot or owner to specify the first Australia airport of call and estimated time and date of arrival as well as a list of all Australian airports at which reportable cargo will be discharged.  This will allow Customs to check that the new cargo reporting requirements are being satisfied.

CEO Instrument No. 2 of 2005 also revokes Instrument No. 16 of 1991 which approved the current approved form that is used for the purpose of reporting cargo that is on board an aircraft and is intended to be unshipped at an airport in Australia.

Consultation

No consultation was undertaken under section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 before this instrument was made as it is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.

Commencement

CEO Instrument No. 2 of 2005 was made on 11 January 2005 and commences on 13 January 2005 to coincide with the commencement of item 3 of Schedule 6 to the Amendment Act.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Legislation Amendment (Airport, Port and Cargo Security) Act 2004, enacted in 2004, aimed to address security gaps in the Customs Act 1901 by introducing new requirements for cargo reporting on aircraft entering Australian airspace. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to enhance security measures concerning air cargo, particularly focusing on the streamlined reporting process for cargo intended to be unshipped at multiple Australian airports. CEO Instrument No. 2 of 2005, which revokes the previous cargo reporting form and introduces a new one, was made under the authority of the Customs Act 1901 to implement these changes. The policy objective is to ensure that cargo reporting requirements are met efficiently, thereby improving the security and management of air cargo entering Australia. This instrument was enacted without consultation as it pertains to minor or machinery changes and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, as amended, applies to the pilot or owner of any aircraft that is on a flight from a place outside Australia and intends to unship cargo at any airport within Australian territory. This legislation mandates the reporting of such cargo to Customs. Specifically, under the new provisions, a report must be made either two hours before the aircraft arrives at its first Australian airport or three hours after its arrival, depending on whether the report is made electronically or in documentary form. The documentary report must be in an approved form, which has been revised to include details such as the first Australian airport of call, the estimated time and date of arrival, and a list of all Australian airports where reportable cargo will be discharged. The CEO Instrument No. 2 of 2005 revokes the previous form used for reporting air cargo, ensuring compliance with the updated reporting requirements which came into effect on 13 January 2005. This change streamlines the process by requiring a single report for all intended unshipping locations within Australia, thus enhancing efficiency and compliance for those involved in international air transport.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the CEO Instrument No. 2 of 2005 and the Customs Act 1901, as amended by the Customs Legislation Amendment (Airport, Port and Cargo Security) Act 2004, establish new procedures for reporting cargo intended to be unshipped from aircraft entering Australia. Section 64AB(3) of the Customs Act 1901, as amended, requires the pilot or owner of an aircraft to report all cargo intended to be unshipped at any Australian airport to Customs either two hours before the aircraft arrives at its first Australian airport or three hours after arrival. This replaces the previous requirement to report cargo separately for each airport of unshipment. To facilitate this change, a new approved form for a documentary cargo report has been introduced, which must be used for reporting cargo. This form must include specific details such as the first Australian airport of call, estimated time and date of arrival, and a list of all Australian airports where reportable cargo will be discharged. The new form was approved by CEO Instrument No. 1 of 2005, which also revoked the previous approved form, CEO Instrument No. 16 of 1991. The obligations imposed by these sections require the pilot or owner of a relevant aircraft to ensure that a comprehensive documentary cargo report is submitted to Customs in the approved form. This report must be signed in the manner specified in the form and include all necessary information about the cargo intended to be unshipped, including the details of the person who can provide the required information. These obligations ensure that Customs has all the necessary information to properly inspect and manage the cargo entering Australia, thereby enhancing security and compliance with customs regulations. The consequences for non-compliance with these requirements are significant. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the explanatory statement, breaches of the Customs Act 1901 can lead to civil or criminal penalties. For example, failure to report cargo as required could result in fines or imprisonment under the Act, as well as potential delays and additional inspections at the port of entry. Additionally, ongoing non-compliance could lead to more severe penalties and could affect the reputation and operations of the pilot or aircraft owner in terms of future clearances and operations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Commencement Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.