EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
CEO Instrument of Approval No. 1 of 2006
Customs Act 1901
Subsection 4A(1A) of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) defines an approved statement as a statement that is approved, by instrument in writing, by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). Subsection 4A(2) of the Act provides that the instrument by which a statement is approved, is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. Under paragraph 6(d) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, approved statements are legislative instruments.
Background
Section 64AB of the Act requires a cargo report to be provided in relation to a ship or aircraft on a voyage or flight to Australia from a place outside Australia. Section 64AB was repealed and replaced by the Customs Legislation Amendment and Repeal (International Trade Modernisation) Act 2001 on 19 July 2005. New subsection 64AB(4B) provides that an electronic cargo report must communicate such information as is set out in an approved statement.
On 14 September 2005, by Instrument of Approval No. 55 of 2005, the CEO approved the “CARGO REPORT (SEA)” statement as an approved statement for the purposes of communicating electronically a cargo report in relation to a ship in accordance with section 64AB of the Act.
Item 14 (Responsible Party ID) of that statement requires the Australian Business Number (ABN) or Customs Client Identifier (CCID) of the cargo reporters or the person who entered into a contractual agreement with the cargo reporter to provide cargo reports to Customs. However, under the Act, only a ‘cargo reporter’ is obliged to provide the cargo report to Customs. ‘Cargo reporter’ is defined in subsection 4(1) of the Act as meaning the operator or charterer of the ship or aircraft, the slot charterer in respect of the ship, or a freight forwarder in respect of the ship or aircraft.
The description of the information required under Item 14 of the “CARGO REPORT (SEA)” statement has been amended so that it is clear that the statutory obligation to provide cargo reports is only on ‘cargo reporters’ and not other persons who may communicate the cargo report to Customs (for example, through a contractual agreement with a cargo reporter) who are not cargo reporters for the purposes of the Act.
CEO Instrument of Approval No. 1 of 2006 revokes CEO Instrument of Approval No. 55 of 2005 and approves the updated version of the “CARGO REPORT (SEA)” statement as an approved statement for the purposes of communicating electronically a cargo report in relation to a ship in accordance with section 64AB of the Act.
Consultation
No consultation was undertaken under section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 before this instrument was made as it is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.
Commencement
The instrument commences on the day after it is registered.
Overview
The Customs Legislation Amendment and Repeal (International Trade Modernisation) Act 2001, enacted in 2001, was designed to modernise Australia's customs processes and facilitate international trade. The Act aimed to streamline customs procedures by replacing outdated provisions and introducing new requirements that align with contemporary trade practices. The problem it sought to address included the need for efficient and accurate cargo reporting mechanisms to ensure the smooth flow of goods into Australia. This Act was enacted by the Australian Parliament with the policy objective of enhancing the customs system's efficiency and effectiveness.
CEO Instrument of Approval No. 1 of 2006, issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs under the Customs Act 1901, addresses a specific issue concerning the clarification of the information required in electronic cargo reports. The instrument updates the approved statement for the "CARGO REPORT (SEA)" to specify that only cargo reporters, as defined by the Act, are obligated to provide the Australian Business Number (ABN) or Customs Client Identifier (CCID) when communicating a cargo report to Customs. This amendment aims to rectify the ambiguity in the previous version of the statement, ensuring that only those directly responsible for the cargo report are legally required to provide specific identifying information.
Scope and Application
The CEO Instrument of Approval No. 1 of 2006, issued under the Customs Act 1901, pertains specifically to the electronic communication of cargo reports for ships arriving in Australia from overseas. This instrument, which revokes the earlier CEO Instrument of Approval No. 55 of 2005, aims to clarify and update the "CARGO REPORT (SEA)" statement, ensuring it aligns with the legislative requirements. It applies to cargo reporters, defined in the Act as the operator or charterer of the ship, the slot charterer in respect of the ship, or a freight forwarder in relation to the ship. The instrument's scope is limited to Australia and applies to all persons or entities fulfilling the role of a cargo reporter. Notably, it excludes other parties who may communicate cargo reports to Customs, such as those entering into a contractual agreement with a cargo reporter but who are not themselves cargo reporters. The instrument serves to streamline the cargo reporting process by ensuring the correct identification details are provided, specifically the Australian Business Number (ABN) or Customs Client Identifier (CCID), and is effective upon registration.
Key Provisions
The Customs Act 1901 (the Act) governs the customs and border protection of Australia, and within it, section 64AB(4B) specifically pertains to the electronic reporting of cargo. This section requires an electronic cargo report to include information set out in an approved statement, which is approved by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (subsection 4A(1A)). The CEO has the authority to approve these statements as legislative instruments under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The CEO Instrument of Approval No. 1 of 2006, therefore, updates the previously approved "CARGO REPORT (SEA)" statement to reflect current obligations and clarify roles. This instrument revokes the previous approval (CEO Instrument of Approval No. 55 of 2005) and replaces it with an updated version, ensuring that the electronic cargo report accurately communicates the required information.
Under the Act, certain parties, specifically referred to as 'cargo reporters', have obligations to provide cargo reports to Customs. These 'cargo reporters' are defined in subsection 4(1) as the operator or charterer of the ship or aircraft, the slot charterer in respect of the ship, or a freight forwarder in respect of the ship or aircraft. The obligation to provide a cargo report rests solely on these cargo reporters, not on other parties who may be involved in the reporting process through contractual agreements. This distinction is clarified in the updated "CARGO REPORT (SEA)" statement, ensuring that only those legally obligated to report are required to do so. The requirement under Item 14 of the "CARGO REPORT (SEA)" statement now explicitly mentions that the Australian Business Number (ABN) or Customs Client Identifier (CCID) must be provided by the cargo reporter or the person who has a contractual agreement with the cargo reporter to provide these reports to Customs.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Customs Act 1901, including the electronic cargo reporting requirements, may result in various consequences. Although specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences are not detailed in the explanatory statement, breaches of customs regulations generally attract penalties under the Act or other related legislation. Penalties can include fines and, in more severe cases, imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The Act provides for enforcement mechanisms, including the ability to disallow the instrument under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, which ensures that the instrument's regulatory impact is subject to parliamentary scrutiny. The updated "CARGO REPORT (SEA)" statement aims to reduce ambiguity and ensure compliance by clearly delineating the roles and responsibilities of cargo reporters.