Customs Act 1901 - CEO Instrument of Approval No. 1 of 2005

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F2005L00060 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

CEO Instrument of Approval No. 1 of 2005

Customs Act 1901

Background

Subsection 4A(1) of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) defines an approved form as a form that is approved, by instrument in writing, by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs (the CEO). Subsection 4(2) of the Act provides that the instrument by which a form is approved under subsection 4A(1), is a disallowable instrument for the purposes of section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.

Subsection 64AB(2) of the Act requires the master or owner of a ship that is on a voyage to Australia from a place outside Australia to report to Customs the cargo on board the ship that is intended to be unshipped at a port in Australia.  Currently a report is required either 24 or 48 hours (depending on the length of the voyage) before the ship arrives at a port where cargo is going to be unshipped at that port.  That is, if cargo is going to be unshipped at Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne, a cargo report will have to be provided 24 or 48 hours before the ship arrives in Brisbane specifying the cargo intended to be unshipped in Brisbane.  A report of the cargo intended to be unshipped in Sydney will have to be made at least 24 or 48 hours before the ship’s arrival in Sydney.  A third report will have to be made at least 24 or 48 hours after the ship’s arrival in Melbourne.

On 13 January 2005, item 3 of Schedule 6 to the Customs Legislation Amendment (Airport, Port and Cargo Security) Act 2004 (the Amendment Act) will replace subsection 64AB(2).  New subsection 64AB(2) will require the master or owner of a relevant ship to report to Customs all of the cargo that is intended to be unshipped from the ship 24 or 48 hours before the ship arrives at its first port in Australia.  Hence, in the example above, the master or owner will have to report all of the cargo intended to be unshipped in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne 24/48 hours before the ship arrives in Brisbane.

Subsection 64AB(4) of the Act provides, in part, that a documentary report of the cargo intended to be unshipped from a ship at a particular port must:

a)        be in the approved form for ship cargo; and

b)        contain the information required by the form; or particulars of the person who is able to provide the information required by the form; and

c)        be signed in a manner specified in the form.

Instrument

CEO Instrument No. 1 of 2005 approves a new form for the purposes of communicating to Customs a documentary cargo report in respect of cargo that is on board a ship and is intended to be unshipped at a port in Australia.  The form has been amended to require the master or owner to specify the first Australia port of call and estimated time and date of arrival as well as a list of all Australian ports at which reportable cargo will be discharged.  This will allow Customs to check that the new cargo reporting requirements are being satisfied.

CEO Instrument No. 1 of 2005 also revokes Instrument No. 15 of 1991 which approved the current approved form that is used for the purposes of reporting cargo that is on board a ship and is intended to be unshipped at a port in Australia.

Consultation

No consultation was undertaken under section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 before this instrument was made as it is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.

Commencement

CEO Instrument No. 1 of 2005 was made on 11 January 2005 and commences on 13 January 2005 to coincide with the commencement of item 3 of Schedule 6 to the Amendment Act.

 

 

 

Overview

The Customs Legislation Amendment (Airport, Port and Cargo Security) Act 2004 introduced changes to the Customs Act 1901 to address security concerns related to the movement of goods into Australia. One of the key changes was to modify the requirements for cargo reporting by the masters or owners of ships entering Australian waters. This change was enacted to streamline the process and enhance security measures by requiring a single report of all cargo intended to be discharged at multiple Australian ports to be made before the ship’s arrival at its first Australian port. The Customs Act 1901, as amended, specifies that the form used for this report must be approved by the Chief Executive Officer of Customs. CEO Instrument No. 1 of 2005, made under the authority of the Customs Act, approved a new form for cargo reporting that requires additional information such as the first Australian port of call, estimated arrival time and date, and a list of all Australian ports where cargo will be discharged. This new form replaced the previous one approved in 1991, ensuring compliance with the updated legislative requirements. The instrument was enacted by the CEO and commenced on 13 January 2005, aligning with the changes introduced by the 2004 Amendment Act.

Scope and Application

The CEO Instrument No. 1 of 2005 pertains to the Customs Act 1901, specifically relating to the approved form required for reporting cargo on board a ship that is intended to be unshipped at a port in Australia. This instrument applies to the master or owner of any relevant ship embarking on a voyage to Australia from a place outside Australia. It mandates that they must report all cargo intended for discharge at any Australian port to Customs, with a particular emphasis on reporting all such cargo 24 or 48 hours prior to the ship's arrival at its first port in Australia. This requirement is effective across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring a streamlined and efficient process for customs clearance. The instrument revokes the previously approved form under Instrument No. 15 of 1991, replacing it with a new form that incorporates the updated reporting requirements, thus ensuring compliance with the new legislative changes introduced by the Customs Legislation Amendment (Airport, Port and Cargo Security) Act 2004. There are no exclusions or exemptions specified within the instrument, and it operates nationally, aligning with the broader objectives of the Customs Act 1901 to regulate and facilitate the importation of goods into Australia.

Key Provisions

The primary operative sections of the CEO Instrument No. 1 of 2005 (paragraphs 1-2) establish a new form for reporting ship cargo intended for discharge at Australian ports, which replaces the existing form approved under Instrument No. 15 of 1991. Section 4A(1) and (2) of the Customs Act 1901 mandate that an approved form must be endorsed by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Customs, and such an instrument is subject to disallowance under the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. The new form, as approved in this instrument, now requires the master or owner of a ship to report all cargo intended for discharge at Australian ports 24 or 48 hours before the ship's arrival at its first Australian port of call. This change aligns with the new requirements introduced by the Customs Legislation Amendment (Airport, Port and Cargo Security) Act 2004, which amended subsection 64AB(2) of the Customs Act 1901. The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties governed by it are quite specific. Under the new subsection 64AB(4) of the Customs Act 1901, any documentary report concerning cargo intended for discharge at a port must be in the approved form, contain the required information, and be signed as specified in the form. This ensures that the master or owner of the ship provides a comprehensive and accurate account of the cargo intended for discharge at Australian ports. The new form also mandates that the master or owner specify the first Australian port of call, the estimated time and date of arrival, and a list of all Australian ports where reportable cargo will be discharged. This additional information allows Customs to effectively monitor compliance with the new reporting requirements. The legislation also outlines consequences for breaches of its provisions. While the explanatory statement does not detail specific offences, penalties, or consequences within the CEO Instrument No. 1 of 2005, it is reasonable to infer that non-compliance with the new form requirements or failure to report cargo as stipulated in the Customs Act 1901 could lead to enforcement actions by Customs. Such actions could include fines, detention of the ship or cargo, or other administrative penalties. Given that the new form is critical for ensuring the security and compliance of cargo reporting, any failure to adhere to its requirements might result in significant repercussions for the ship's master or owner.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs & Excise Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Definitions & Interpretation

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.