EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
CRIMES REGULATIONS (AMENDMENT)
1990 NO. 32.
The Crimes Regulations (Amendment) prescribe circumstances, for the purposes of section 85ZKB(2)(c) of the Crimes Act 1914, in which the new offence prohibiting a person from manufacturing, advertising, displaying, offering for sale, selling or possessing a device which the person knows is of a kind capable of being used to intercept a communication in contravention of section 7(1) of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 (the Interception Act) does not apply. The circumstances are -
(a) in relation to the advertising, displaying, offering for sale or sale of an apparatus or device, for a purpose related to the interception of communications that is not in contravention of section 7(1) of the Interception Act because of section 6(3) or 7(2) of that Act;
(b) in relation to the manufacture or possession of an apparatus or device, for a purpose related to a circumstance specified in paragraph (a);
(c) in relation to the manufacture of an apparatus or device, for a purpose related to section 85ZKB(2)(b) of the Crimes Act 1914;
(d) in relation to the manufacture or possession of an apparatus or device, where the apparatus or device is to be exported;
(e) in relation to the manufacture, offering for sale, sale or possession of an apparatus or device, for a purpose related to the use of a listening device under relevant Commonwealth and State law; and
(f) in relation to the possession of an apparatus or device, where the possession of the device relates to the investigation or prosecution of specified offences.
Authorised by the Attorney-General
Overview
The Crimes Regulations (Amendment) 1990, No. 32, was enacted to address the need for specific circumstances under which the new offence of manufacturing, advertising, displaying, offering for sale, selling, or possessing a device capable of intercepting communications without authorisation does not apply. This regulation was designed to provide clarity and exceptions to the broader prohibition established under section 85ZKB(2)(c) of the Crimes Act 1914, ensuring that the legislation does not inadvertently criminalise legitimate activities. Authorised by the Attorney-General, the amendments aim to balance the need to prevent illegal interception of communications with the protection of lawful activities that may involve similar devices. The objective is to maintain the integrity of communication privacy while accommodating authorised uses of such devices in accordance with other relevant Australian laws.
Scope and Application
The Crimes Regulations (Amendment) 1990 No. 32 amends the Crimes Regulations to specify exceptions to the offence created by section 85ZKB of the Crimes Act 1914. This new offence prohibits the manufacturing, advertising, displaying, offering for sale, selling, or possessing of devices capable of intercepting communications in contravention of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979. The regulations delineate specific circumstances under which this prohibition does not apply, including the advertising, displaying, offering for sale, or sale of devices for lawful interception purposes, as well as the manufacture, possession, or export of devices for certain purposes such as those related to law enforcement investigations or prosecutions of specified offences. These provisions aim to ensure that legitimate activities, such as the lawful use of listening devices in accordance with Commonwealth and State law, are not inadvertently criminalised by the new offence. The regulations extend the scope of the Crimes Act by clarifying the boundaries of the new offence through subordinate legislation.
Key Provisions
The main sections of the Crimes Regulations (Amendment) (No. 32) 1990, particularly those relevant to the amendments, are concerned with clarifying the circumstances under which the new offence of manufacturing, advertising, displaying, offering for sale, selling, or possessing a device capable of intercepting communications without lawful authority does not apply (section 2). These provisions aim to specify scenarios where such activities are permissible under the law. For instance, advertising, displaying, offering for sale, or selling a device for purposes not in contravention of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 (section 2(a)), or manufacturing or possessing a device for a purpose related to the exemptions provided in the Interception Act or for specific lawful purposes such as investigation or prosecution (section 2(b)-(f)), are circumstances where the new offence does not apply.
The Act imposes specific obligations on parties or entities by detailing the situations where the prohibition on communication interception devices does not apply. For example, it requires that any advertising, displaying, offering for sale, or sale of devices must be for purposes that do not contravene the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979, such as those exempted by sections 6(3) or 7(2) of that Act (section 2(a)). Similarly, the manufacture or possession of devices must be related to permissible purposes such as those specified in the Interception Act or for specific uses under Commonwealth and State law (sections 2(b)-(f)). Additionally, it mandates that any possession of such devices must be for lawful purposes such as the investigation or prosecution of specified offences (section 2(f)).
Breaching the provisions of the Crimes Act 1914 and the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 can lead to significant legal consequences. Under section 85ZKB(2)(c) of the Crimes Act 1914, a person who manufactures, advertises, displays, offers for sale, sells, or possesses a device capable of intercepting communications without lawful authority may face criminal penalties. The exact nature and severity of these penalties are governed by the Crimes Act and other relevant legislation, and they may include fines and imprisonment. The specific maximum penalties are not detailed in the Explanatory Statement but would typically be found in the Crimes Act itself and the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979. The precise penalties would depend on the nature of the offence and the jurisdiction in which it is prosecuted.